CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 79

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Crocus sativus L. extracts antagonize memory impairments in different behavioural tasks in the rat

PITSIKAS, N, SAKELLARIDIS, N·2006·Behavioural Brain Research
DOI 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.06.005
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The effects of extracts of Crocus sativus L. (CSE), on memory were investigated in the rat by using the object recognition and the step-through passive avoidance task. In the first study, post-training administration of CSE (30 and 60 g/kg) successfully counteracted extinction of recognition memory in the normal rat, suggesting that CSE modulates storage and/or retrieval of information. In a subsequent study, pre-training treatment with CSE (30 and 60 mg/kg) significantly antagonized the scopolamine (0.75 mg/kg)-induced performance deficits in the step-through passive avoidance test. These results support and extend prior findings about the implication of CSE in learning and memory mechanisms.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.06.005

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 79

Metadata

Authors
PITSIKAS, N., & SAKELLARIDIS, N.
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-10-02
Volume
173
Issue
1
Pages
112-115
ISSN
0166-4328
DOI
10.1016/j.bbr.2006.06.005
Cited by
79
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review