Cited by 287Creativity in Education and NeuroscienceNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAesthetic Perception and Analysis

Neuroimaging creativity: a psychometric view

Arden, Rosalind, Chavez, Robert S., Grazioplene, Rachael, Jung, Rex E.·2010·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

Many studies of creative cognition with a neuroimaging component now exist; what do they say about where and how creativity arises in the brain? We reviewed 45 brain-imaging studies of creative cognition. We found little clear evidence of overlap in their results. Nearly as many different tests were used as there were studies; this test diversity makes it impossible to interpret the different findings across studies with any confidence. Our conclusion is that creativity research would benefit from psychometrically informed revision, and the addition of neuroimaging methods designed to provide greater spatial localization of function. Without such revision in the behavioral measures and study designs, it is hard to see the benefit of imaging. We set out eight suggestions in a manifesto for taking creativity research forward.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.05.015

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent literature reviews have been largely inconclusive on the brain basis of creative thought.

    “Recent literature reviews have been largely inconclusive on the brain basis of creative thought (Arden et al., 2010, Dietrich and Kanso, 2010, Sawyer, 2011), raising questions about whether creativity can be isolated to discrete regions in the brain (Abraham, 2013, Jung et al., 2013).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arden, R., Chavez, R. S., Grazioplene, R., & Jung, R. E.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Mind Research Network (US)
Corresponding author
Jung, Rex E.
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-12
Volume
214
Issue
2
Pages
143-156
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2132337600
Cited by
287
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 11
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
John Templeton Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Keywords
creativity, creative cognition, brain localization of function, behavioral measures, research design
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Creativity, Humans, Psychometrics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review