Cited by 86Creativity in Education and NeuroscienceArt Therapy and Mental HealthNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Frontal lobe neurology and the creative mind

Open access
de Souza, Leonardo C., Guimarães, Henrique C., Teixeira, Antônio L., Caramelli, Paulo, Levy, Richard, Dubois, Bruno, Volle, Emmanuelle·2014·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Concepts from cognitive neuroscience strongly suggest that the prefrontal cortex (PFC) plays a crucial role in the cognitive functions necessary for creative thinking. Functional imaging studies have repeatedly demonstrated the involvement of PFC in creativity tasks. Patient studies have demonstrated that frontal damage due to focal lesions or neurodegenerative diseases are associated with impairments in various creativity tasks. However, against all odds, a series of clinical observations has reported the facilitation of artistic production in patients with neurodegenerative diseases affecting PFC, such as frontotemporal dementia (FTD). An exacerbation of creativity in frontal diseases would challenge neuroimaging findings in controls and patients, as well as the theoretical role of prefrontal functions in creativity processes. To explore this paradox, we reported the history of a FTD patient who exhibited the emergence of visual artistic productions during the course of the disease. The patient produced a large amount of drawings, which have been evaluated by a group of professional artists who were blind to the diagnosis. We also reviewed the published clinical cases reporting a change in the artistic abilities in patients with neurological diseases. We attempted to reconcile these clinical observations to previous experimental findings by addressing several questions raised by our review. For instance, to what extent can the cognitive, conative, and affective changes following frontal damage explain changes in artistic abilities? Does artistic exacerbation truly reflect increased creative capacities? These considerations could help to clarify the place of creativity-as it has been defined and explored by cognitive neuroscience-in artistic creation and may provide leads for future lesion studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00761

Cites

166 of 166 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Fellows L. K. (2013). Decision-making: executive functions meet motivation, in Principles of Frontal Lobe Function, 2nd Edn., eds Stuss D. T. Knight R. T. (New York, NY: Oxford University Press), 490– 500

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Souza, L. C., Guimarães, H. C., Teixeira, A. L., Caramelli, P., Levy, R., Dubois, B., & Volle, E.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2014-07-23
Volume
5
Pages
761-761
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2107915034
Cited by
86
References
166
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR‐09‐RPDOC‐004‐01)
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (402853/2012-1, 402853/2012)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
prefrontal cortex, creativity, frontotemporal dementia, artistic production, frontal lobe damage, neurodegenerative diseases, cognitive neuroscience of creativity, lesion studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review