Cited by 37Creativity in Education and NeuroscienceCognitive Science and Education ResearchLanguage, Metaphor, and Cognition

A Common Mode of Processing Governing Divergent Thinking and Future Imagination

Roberts, Reece P., Addis, Donna Rose·2018·The Cambridge Handbook of the Neuroscience of Creativity

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/9781316556238.013

Cites

123 of 123 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The brain's default network is involved not only in mental time travel into the past and future but also in other forms of mental time travel such as counterfactual thinking, and in other cognition including creativity, theory of mind, narrative comprehension, and event perception.

    “However, it is becoming increasingly apparent that the brain's default network is not only involved in MTT into the past and future but also engaged other forms of MTT such as counterfactual thinking (De Brigard, Addis, Ford, Schacter, & Giovanello, 2013), and other forms of cognition, including creativity (Roberts & Addis, 2018), theory of mind (Frith & Frith, 2003), narrative comprehension (Mar,”

    From Mental Time Travel? A Neurocognitive Model of Event Simulation. (2020) · cites this paper as Roberts & Addis, 2018

  • When simulating novel or unusual events, conceptual expansion and spreading activation through semantic networks may be needed to expand the simulation space so disparate ideas can be incorporated into a coherent simulation.

    “when simulating novel or unusual events, processes such as conceptual expansion and spreading activation through semantic networks may be required to expand the 'simulation space' so as to incorporate disparate ideas into a novel yet coherent simulation (Roberts & Addis, 2018).”

    From Mental Time Travel? A Neurocognitive Model of Event Simulation. (2020) · cites this paper as Roberts & Addis, 2018

  • These findings fit the notion that brain networks functionally couple and uncouple according to task demands, and studies report DMN-frontoparietal control network connectivity increases as flexible or creative thinking is needed.

    “Such findings fit with the notion that brain networks functionally couple and uncouple as required by task demands, and a number of studies report connectivity between DMN and frontoparietal control network as the need for flexible or creative thinking increases (e.g., Beaty, Benedek, Barry Kaufman, & Silvia, 2015;Roberts & Addis, 2018;Spreng, Stevens, Chamberlain, Gilmore, & Schacter, 2010).”

    From Mental Time Travel? A Neurocognitive Model of Event Simulation. (2020) · cites this paper as Roberts & Addis, 2018

  • Schema-reliance has a positive linear association with involvement of anterior DMN and frontoparietal control network, supporting higher-level relational reasoning and activation of conceptual content.

    “The degree of schema-reliance has a positive linear association with the involvement of anterior aspects of the DMN and frontopartietal control network to support higher-level relational reasoning processes and activation of conceptual content (Roberts & Addis, 2018).”

    From Mental Time Travel? A Neurocognitive Model of Event Simulation. (2020) · cites this paper as Roberts & Addis, 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roberts, R. P., & Addis, D. R.
Affiliations
University of Auckland (NZ)
Venue
The Cambridge Handbook of the Neuroscience of Creativity
Published
2018-01-22
Pages
211-230
OpenAlex
W3081157130
Cited by
37
References
123
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 20 · 2018: 1
FWCI
33.33
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Auckland
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Keywords
divergent thinking, future imagination, cognitive processes, creativity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review