Cited by 31Memory and Neural MechanismsNerve injury and regenerationNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Hippocampal BDNF treatment facilitates consolidation of spatial memory in spontaneous place recognition in rats

Ozawa, Takaaki, Yamada, Kazuo, Ichitani, Yukio·2014·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

In order to investigate the role of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in the consolidation of spatial memory, we examined the relationship between the increase of hippocampal BDNF and the establishment of long-term spatial memory in spontaneous place recognition test in rats. The test consisted of a sample phase, delay interval, and a test phase, and preferred exploration of the object in a novel place compared with that in a familiar place was assessed in the test phase. In experiment 1, dorsal hippocampal administration of anisomycin, a protein synthesis inhibitor, before the sample phase (20 min) abolished the preference for the novel place object in the test phase conducted 24h later. This impairment was reversed by the dorsal hippocampal BDNF treatment immediately after the sample phase, although the BDNF treatment alone did not improve performance. In experiment 2, we used a shorter sample phase condition (5 min) in which control rats did not show any preference for the novel place object in the test phase after 24h delay, and found that BDNF treatment immediately after the sample phase caused rats' significant preference for it. Results suggest an important role of hippocampal BDNF as a product of protein synthesis that is required for the consolidation of spatial memory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.01.034

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ozawa, T., Yamada, K., & Ichitani, Y.
Affiliations
University of Tsukuba (JP)
Corresponding author
Ichitani, Yukio
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-04
Volume
263
Pages
210-216
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006712760
Cited by
31
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society (24653209, 24530909)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
brain-derived neurotrophic factor, hippocampus, spatial memory consolidation, anisomycin, protein synthesis, long-term memory, novel object preference, rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Anisomycin, Exploratory Behavior, Hippocampus, Male, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Protein Synthesis Inhibitors, Space Perception, Task Performance and Analysis, Time Factors, Rats, Wistar, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Recognition, Psychology, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review