Cited by 55Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Testing and Assessment

Psychometric Properties of the State-Trait Inventory for Cognitive and Somatic Anxiety (STICSA) in Friendship Dyads

Gros, Daniel F., Simms, Leonard J., Antony, Martin M.·2010·Behavior Therapy

Abstract

Recently, Gros, Antony, Simms, and McCabe (2007) demonstrated support for the psychometric properties of a new measure of state and trait anxiety, the State-Trait Inventory for Cognitive and Somatic Anxiety (STICSA). In the present study, we further investigated the STICSA-Trait Version in 127 friendship dyads with a self-report from one participant (target) and an other-report of the target from a friend (informant). Consistent with previous research, confirmatory factor analyses supported the 2-factor structure of the STICSA-Trait in the target and informant reports. Moreover, the STICSA-Trait Cognitive and Somatic Anxiety subscales showed acceptable convergent and discriminant validity with related measures of anxiety. In addition, the STICSA-Trait subscales demonstrated adequate internal consistency and self-other agreement across the target and informant reports. Together, these findings provide additional support for the STICSA-Trait subscales as reliable and valid measures of cognitive and somatic anxiety.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beth.2009.07.001

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gros, D. F., Simms, L. J., & Antony, M. M.
Affiliations
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
Venue
Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-09
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
277-284
ISSN
0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054416644
Cited by
55
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH080086)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
cognitive anxiety, somatic anxiety, trait anxiety, state anxiety, friendship dyads, self-other agreement, informant reports, psychometric properties, factor structure, convergent validity, discriminant validity, internal consistency
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Cognition, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Assessment, Reproducibility of Results, Friends, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review