Cited by 93Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingMental Health Research Topics

The Spielberger trait anxiety inventory measures more than anxiety

Caci, Hervé, Baylé, Franck J., Dossios, Christelle, Robert, Philippe, Boyer, Patrice·2003·European Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: Researchers tried to explain the overlap between anxiety and depression by suggesting that some items of self-administered questionnaires were badly selected and that both constructs should rather be considered as multidimensional. Thus, we hypothesise that the Spielberger trait anxiety inventory (TAI) includes items related to depression. Method: A non-clinical sample of 193 subjects filled out the TAI and the Hospitalised Anxiety–Depression Scale. Factors were postulated on the basis of item content and submitted to confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Results: We found five factors: a 10-item anxiety factor containing three factors, a four-item unsuccessfulness factor correlated with the HADS anhedonia factor, and a six-item happiness factor. Conclusion: The TAI scale encompasses measures of anxiety, depression and well-being. Consequently, the overlap with other measures of depression may result from item selection. This work awaits replication in independent normal and pathological samples.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2003.05.003

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory was initially intended to assess anxiety but has more recently been determined to measure a broader type of distress, a higher order factor of negative affect that incorporates both anxiety and depression.

    “The STAI was initially intended to assess anxiety, but has been more recently determined to measure a broader type of distress, a “higher order factor of negative affect” that incorporates both anxiety (worry, distressing thoughts) and depression (dysphoric mood and negative self-appraisal (Bieling, Antony, & Swinson, 1998; Caci, Bayle, Dossios, Robert, & Boyer, 2003; Gros, Antony, Simms, & McCabe”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Caci, H., Baylé, F. J., Dossios, C., Robert, P., & Boyer, P.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
European Psychiatry
Published
2003-12
Volume
18
Issue
8
Pages
394-400
ISSN
  • 0924-9338 (ISSN-L)
  • 1778-3585
OpenAlex
W1993196358
Cited by
93
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Pfizer
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
trait anxiety, depression, anhedonia, happiness, well-being, factor structure, item selection
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Female, Happiness, Humans, Male, Mathematical Computing, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Reference Values, Statistics as Topic, Students, Students, Medical, Students, Nursing, Reproducibility of Results, Models, Statistical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review