Cited by 281Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

The Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale–Short Form: Development and Validation

Manos, Rachel C., Kanter, Jonathan W., Luo, Wen·2011·Behavior Therapy

Abstract

Following a landmark component analysis of cognitive therapy by Jacobson and colleagues (1996), there has been renewed interest in behavioral activation (BA) treatments for depression. The Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS) was developed to measure when and how clients become activated over the course of BA treatment. Multiple studies have provided initial support for the BADS but have also identified several potential problems. Four studies were conducted in order to develop and provide initial evaluation of a short form of the BADS that addresses these concerns. In Study 1, an exploratory factor analysis was conducted on existing data using the original BADS in order to identify items to retain for the short form. In Study 2, these items were administered to a new sample of college students with elevated depressive symptoms and were analyzed with exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Study 3 examined the predictive validity of the BADS-SF by examining the BADS-SF and depression scores in relation to activity tracking and reward-value ratings over the course of 1 week. Study 4 examined BADS-SF data over the course of BA treatment for two clients using cross-lagged panel correlations. With one client, changes in BADS-SF scores led changes in depression scores by 1 week, whereas with the other client changes in BADS-SF and depression scores occurred concurrently. These studies resulted in a nine-item scale that demonstrated good item characteristics as well as acceptable internal consistency reliability, construct validity, and predictive validity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beth.2011.04.004

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Manos, R. C., Kanter, J. W., & Luo, W.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
Corresponding author
Kanter, Jonathan W.
Venue
Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
726-739
ISSN
0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084940969
Cited by
276
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
short-form scale, behavioral activation, depression, scale development, factor analysis, predictive validity, activity monitoring, reward value, university students, cognitive therapy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Behavior Therapy, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review