Cited by 16Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Explaining the efficacy of an internet-based behavioral activation intervention for major depression: A mechanistic study of a randomized-controlled trial

Open access
Fu, Zhongfang, Burger, Huibert, Arjadi, Retha, Nauta, Maaike H., Bockting, Claudi L. H.·2021·Clinical Psychology in Europe

Abstract

Background: Behavioral activation is an effective treatment for depression that is theorized to facilitate structured increases in enjoyable activities that increase opportunities for contact with positive reinforcement; to date, however, only few mechanistic studies focused on a standalone intervention. Method: Interventions using internet-based behavioral activation or psychoeducation were compared based on data from a randomized-controlled trial of 313 patients with major depressive disorder. Activation level and depression were measured fortnightly (baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10), using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and the Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale-Short Form, respectively. Analysis was performed to determine if a change in activation level mediated treatment efficacy. Results: Latent growth modeling showed that internet-based behavioral activation treatment significantly reduced depressive symptoms from baseline to the end of treatment (standardized coefficient = −.13, p = .017) by increasing the rate of growth in the activation level (mediated effect estimate = −.17, 95% CI [−.27, −.07]. Results from mixed effects and simplex models showed that it took 4 weeks before mediation occurred (i.e., a significant change in activation that led to a reduction in depressive symptoms). Conclusion: Activation level likely mediated the therapeutic effect of behavioral activation on depression in our intervention. This finding may be of significant value to clinicians and depressed individuals who should anticipate a 4-week window before seeing a prominent change in activation level and a 6-week window before depressive symptomatology reduces. Future research must consolidate our findings on how behavioral activation works and when mediation occurs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.32872/cpe.5467

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Results of an internet-based CBT intervention revealed that positive effects occur already after 4 weeks of CBT.

    “Recently, results of an internet-based CBT intervention revealed that positive effects occur already after 4 weeks of CBT [34].”

    From A Smartphone Serious Game for Adolescents (Grow It! App): Development, Feasibility, and Acceptance Study (2022) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Discussion reports improved activation levels from Week 4, so the paper does identify a positive change at that point. But it studied internet-based behavioral activation, not an intervention described as CBT, and reports reduced depressive symptoms only from Week 6. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fu, Z., Burger, H., Arjadi, R., Nauta, M. H., & Bockting, C. L. H.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia (ID)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Bockting, Claudi L. H.
Venue
Clinical Psychology in Europe
Published
2021-09-30
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
e5467-e5467
ISSN
2625-3410 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3202894755
Cited by
16
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology in Europe (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • PsychOpen Gold (Leibniz Institute for Psychology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Psychology Archives (cc-by)
Funders
Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
behavioral activation, major depressive disorder, online intervention, mediation, activation level, psychoeducation, treatment efficacy, latent growth curve models, simplex model, positive reinforcement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review