Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 664

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Where to put things? Spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns

Polasky, Stephen, Nelson, Erik, Camm, Jeff, Csuti, Blair, Fackler, Paul, Lonsdorf, Eric, Montgomery, Claire, White, Denis, Arthur, Jeff, Garber-Yonts, Brian, Haight, Robert, Kagan, Jimmy, Starfield, Anthony, Tobalske, Claudine·2008·Biological Conservation
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.03.022
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.03.022

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. Allen-Wardell, 1998, The potential consequences of pollinator declines on the conservation of biodiversity and stability of food crop yields, Conservation Biology, 12, 8, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.97154.x · DOI · Paper page
  2. Ando, 1998, Species distributions, land values and efficient conservation, Science, 279, 2126, 10.1126/science.279.5359.2126 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Armsworth, 2006, Land market feedbacks can undermine biodiversity conservation, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 5403, 10.1073/pnas.0505278103 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Balmford, 2000, Integrating conservation costs into international priority setting, Conservation Biology, 11, 597, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.00000-i2.x · DOI
  5. Brown, E.R. (Ed.), 1985. Management of wildlife and fish habitats in forest of Western Oregon and Washington, Part 2. General Technical Report R6-F&WL-192-1985. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR.
  6. Cabeza, 2003, Site-selection algorithms and habitat loss, Conservation Biology, 17, 1402, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01421.x · DOI
  7. Calkin, 2002, Developing a production possibility set of wildlife species persistence and timber harvest value using simulated annealing, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 32, 1329, 10.1139/x02-056 · doi:10.1139/x02-056
  8. Camm, 1996, A note on optimal algorithms for reserve site selection, Biological Conservation, 78, 353, 10.1016/0006-3207(95)00132-8 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Church, 1996, Reserve selection as a maximal coverage problem, Biological Conservation, 76, 105, 10.1016/0006-3207(95)00102-6 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Costello, 2004, Dynamic reserve site selection, Resource and Energy Economics, 26, 157, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2003.11.005 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Csuti, 1997, A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon, Biological Conservation, 80, 83, 10.1016/S0006-3207(96)00068-7 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Curtis, 1992, A new look at an old question – Douglas fir culmination age, Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 7, 97, 10.1093/wjaf/7.4.97 · doi:10.1093/wjaf/7.4.97
  13. Daily, 2003, Countryside biogeography of Neotropical mammals: conservation opportunities in agricultural landscapes of Costa Rica, Conservation Biology, 17, 1814, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00298.x · DOI · Paper page
  14. Daily, 2001, Countryside biogeography: use of human dominated habitats by the avifauna of southern Costa Rica, Ecological Applications, 11, 1, 10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0001:CBUOHD]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Daily, 2000, The value of nature and the nature of value, Science, 289, 395, 10.1126/science.289.5478.395 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Fight, R.D., LeDoux, C.B., Ortman, T.L., 1984. Logging costs for management planning for young-growth coast Douglas-fir. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-176. Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, OR. · DOI
  17. Franklin, 1993, Preserving biodiversity: species, ecosystems, or landscapes?, Ecological Applications, 3, 202, 10.2307/1941820 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Fuller, 2007, The cost of postponing biodiversity conservation in Mexico, Biological Conservation, 134, 593, 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.08.028 · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.08.028
  19. Greenleaf, 2006, Wild bees enhance honey bees’ pollination of hybrid sunflower, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 13890, 10.1073/pnas.0600929103 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Haight, 1995, Comparing extinction risk and economic cost in wildlife conservation planning, Ecological Applications, 5, 767, 10.2307/1941984 · doi:10.2307/1941984
  21. Hansen, 1993, An approach for managing vertebrate diversity across multiple-use landscapes, Ecological Applications, 3, 481, 10.2307/1941917 · DOI
  22. Hanski, 2000, The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape, Nature, 404, 755, 10.1038/35008063 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Holzkamper, 2007, Evaluating cost-effectiveness of conservation management actions in an agricultural landscape on a regional scale, Biological Conservation, 136, 117, 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.11.011 · DOI
  24. Jiang, 2007, Designing a spatially-explicit nature reserve network based on ecological functions: An integer programming approach, Biological Conservation, 140, 236, 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.08.009 · DOI
  25. Kline, 2001, Integrating urbanization into landscape-level ecological assessments, Ecosystems, 4, 3, 10.1007/s100210000056 · DOI
  26. Latta, 2004, Minimizing the cost of stand level management for older forest structure in western Oregon, Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 19, 221, 10.1093/wjaf/19.4.221 · doi:10.1093/wjaf/19.4.221
  27. Lichtenstein, 2003, Biodiversity and timber in the Coast Range of Oregon: inside the production possibility frontier, Land Economics, 79, 56, 10.2307/3147105 · doi:10.2307/3147105
  28. Margules, 2000, Systematic conservation planning, Nature, 405, 242, 10.1038/35012251 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Marshall, 2000, Exploring strategies for improving the cost effectiveness of endangered species management, Land Economics, 76, 462, 10.2307/3147041 · DOI
  30. McCarthy, 2006, Logic for designing nature reserves for multiple species, American Naturalist, 167, 717, 10.1086/503058 · doi:10.1086/503058
  31. Meir, 2004, Does conservation planning matter in a dynamic and uncertain world?, Ecology Letters, 7, 615, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00624.x · DOI · Paper page
  32. Moilanen, 2002, Single-species dynamic site selection, Ecological Applications, 12, 913, 10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0913:SSDSS]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  33. Moilanen, 2005, Prioritizing multiple-use landscapes for conservation: methods for large multi-species planning problems, Proceedings of the Royal Society. Series B, 272, 1885, 10.1098/rspb.2005.3164 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Montgomery, 1994, The marginal cost of species preservation: the northern spotted owl, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26, 111, 10.1006/jeem.1994.1007 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Montgomery, 1999, Pricing biodiversity, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 38, 1, 10.1006/jeem.1999.1073 · DOI
  36. Moore, 2004, Integrating costs into conservation planning across Africa, Biological Conservation, 117, 343, 10.1016/j.biocon.2003.12.013 · DOI
  37. Murray, 1998, Federal timber restrictions and interregional arbitrage in U.S. lumber, Land Economics, 74, 76, 10.2307/3147214 · doi:10.2307/3147214
  38. Naidoo, 2006, Integrating economic costs into conservation planning, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21, 681, 10.1016/j.tree.2006.10.003 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Naidoo, 2007, Global-scale mapping of economic benefits from agricultural lands: implications for conservation priorities, Biological Conservation, 140, 40, 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.025 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Nalle, 2002, Economic and spatial impacts of an existing reserve network on future augmentation, Ecological Modeling and Assessment, 7, 99, 10.1023/A:1015697632040 · DOI
  41. Nalle, 2004, Modeling joint production of wildlife and timber in forests, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 48, 997, 10.1016/j.jeem.2004.01.001 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Nelson, E., 2007. Essays on the Allocation of Federal Species-Specific Recovery Funds under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Ph.D. Dissertation, Applied Economics, University of Minnesota.
  43. Nelson, E., Polasky, S., Lewis, D.J., Plantinga, A.J., Lonsdorf, E., White, D., Bael, D., Lawler, J.J., forthcoming-b. Efficiency of incentives to jointly increase carbon sequestration and species conservation on a landscape. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
  44. Nicholson, 2006, A new method for conservation planning for the persistence of multiple species, Ecology Letters, 9, 1049, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00956.x · DOI
  45. Pereira, 2006, Modeling biodiversity dynamics in countryside landscapes, Ecology, 87, 1877, 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1877:MBDICL]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Polasky, 2001, Selecting biological reserves cost-effectively: an application to terrestrial vertebrate conservation in Oregon, Land Economics, 77, 68, 10.2307/3146981 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Polasky, 2005, Conserving species in a working landscape: land use with biological and economic objectives, Ecological Applications, 15, 1387, 10.1890/03-5423 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Pressey, 1994, Ad hoc reservations: forward or backward steps in developing representative reserve systems?, Conservation Biology, 8, 662, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08030662.x · DOI · Paper page
  49. Ricketts, 2004, Economic value of tropical forest to coffee production, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 12579, 10.1073/pnas.0405147101 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Rondinini, 2006, Tradeoffs of different types of species occurrence data for use in systematic conservation planning, Ecology Letters, 9, 1136, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00970.x · DOI · Paper page
  51. Sarkar, 2006, Biodiversity conservation planning tools: present status and challenges for the future, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31, 123, 10.1146/annurev.energy.31.042606.085844 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Scott, 2001, Nature reserves: do they capture the full range of America’s biological diversity?, Ecological Applications, 11, 999, 10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0999:NRDTCT]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Shultz, 2001, The use of census data for hedonic price estimates of open-space amenities and land use, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 22, 239, 10.1023/A:1007895631071 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Strange, 2006, Using farmland prices to evaluate cost-efficiency of national versus regional reserve selection in Denmark, Biological Conservation, 128, 455, 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.10.009 · DOI
  55. Strange, 2006, Optimal reserve selection in a dynamic world, Biological Conservation, 131, 33, 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.02.002 · DOI
  56. Thorsnes, 2002, The value of a suburban forest preserve: estimates from sales of vacant residential building lots, Land Economics, 78, 426, 10.2307/3146900 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Tilman, 2001, Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change, Science, 292, 281, 10.1126/science.1057544 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Tilman, 2002, Habitat destruction and the extinction debt, Nature, 371, 65, 10.1038/371065a0 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Tyrvainen, 2000, Property prices and urban forest amenities, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 39, 205, 10.1006/jeem.1999.1097 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Vos, 2001, Toward ecologically scaled landscape indices, American Naturalist, 157, 24, 10.1086/317004 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Wear, 1996, Ecosystem management with multiple owners: landscape dynamics in a Southern Appalachian watershed, Ecological Applications, 6, 1173, 10.2307/2269600 · DOI
  62. Wilson, 2006, Prioritizing global conservation efforts, Nature, 440, 337, 10.1038/nature04366 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 664

Metadata

Authors
Polasky, S., Nelson, E., Camm, J., Csuti, B., Fackler, P., Lonsdorf, E., Montgomery, C., White, D., Arthur, J., Garber-Yonts, B., Haight, R., Kagan, J., Starfield, A., & Tobalske, C.
Venue
Biological Conservation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-06
Volume
141
Issue
6
Pages
1505-1524
ISSN
0006-3207 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.biocon.2008.03.022
OpenAlex
W2157638901
Cited by
664
References
2
FWCI
30.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Where to put things? Spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.03.022
The paper
Polasky, S., Nelson, E., Camm, J., Csuti, B., Fackler, P., Lonsdorf, E., Montgomery, C., White, D., Arthur, J., Garber-Yonts, B., Haight, R., Kagan, J., Starfield, A., & Tobalske, C. (2008). Where to put things? Spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns. Biological Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.03.022

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.