Cited by 48Insect Resistance and GeneticsGenetically Modified Organisms ResearchInsect-Plant Interactions and Control

Effects of exposure to the toxin Cry1Ab through Bt maize fed-prey on the performance and digestive physiology of the predatory rove beetle Atheta coriaria

García, Matías, Ortego, Félix, Castañera, Pedro, Farinós, Gema P.·2010·Biological Control

Abstract

In this study we assess the prey-mediated effects of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) Cry1Ab-expressed in maize on the performance and digestive physiology of the rove beetle Atheta coriaria (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae), using Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) as prey in tritrophic bioassays. The toxin was detected in both T. urticae and A. coriaria adults and larvae, with concentrations of Cry1Ab decreasing through the trophic chain. In A. coriaria adults, the toxin decayed following an exponential curve, not being detectable in their bodies 24 h after the exposure to Bt-fed mites. When the performance of A. coriaria reared on (i) Bt maize infested with T. urticae, (ii) non-Bt maize infested with T. urticae, and (iii) rearing food were compared, no differences were found in any of the parameters analyzed (duration of immature stages, sex ratio, survivorship, fecundity and egg fertility). Proteolytic activities of A. coriaria adults fed with mites raised on Bt maize did not show differences with those reared on non-Bt fed-prey, indicating that the nutritional quality of the prey was not affected by exposure to the toxin. This work represents the first study dealing with prey-mediated effects of Bt maize on larvae and adults of a rove beetle. The use of this cosmopolitan rove beetle as an indicator species to assess potential effects of genetically modified crops on non-target arthropods is feasible.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2010.08.002

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
García, M., Ortego, F., Castañera, P., & Farinós, G. P.
Affiliations
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
Corresponding author
Farinós, Gema P.
Venue
Biological Control
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-12
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
225-233
ISSN
1049-9644 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052776489
Cited by
48
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Control (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences
  • Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica y el Reto Demográfico
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Insect Resistance and Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
Keywords
Cry1Ab toxin, Bt maize, Tetranychus urticae, non-target arthropods, genetically modified crops, digestive physiology, proteolytic activity, insect performance, indicator species

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review