CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 28

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Towards effective national and international governance for a sustainable bioeconomy: A global expert perspective

Dietz, Thomas, Rubio Jovel, Karla, Deciancio, Melisa, Boldt, Christin, Börner, Jan·2023·EFB Bioeconomy Journal
DOI 10.1016/j.bioeco.2023.100058
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In an ideal scenario, the bioeconomy creates technology-based opportunities that promote economic growth and social progress while decoupling these development goals from increasing resource consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Over the last decade, many countries worldwide have adopted comprehensive bioeconomy strategies. However, little is known about the implementation of these strategies. The following article presents and discusses the results of a survey of 282 global bioeconomy experts conducted in 2020 on behalf of the German Bioeconomy Council. We take stock of the implementation of bioeconomy strategies, identify continued governance gaps that constrain transformative shifts towards a sustainable bioeconomy and determine political support measures to overcome these gaps. Most importantly, our results show that even more intergovernmental cooperation and coordination at the international level is needed to create frameworks for sustainable bioeconomy development.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bioeco.2023.100058

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Albrecht, 2021, Regional bioeconomies: public finance and sustainable policy narratives, Geografiska Annaler, Ser. B Hum. Geogr., 103, 116, 10.1080/04353684.2021.1921603 · DOI
  2. Ashukem, 2020, The SDGs and the bio-economy: fostering land-grabbing in Africa, Rev. Afr. Polit. Economy, 47, 275
  3. Lima, 2013, The policy context of biofuels: a case of non-governance at the global level?, Global Environ. Politics, 13, 46, 10.1162/GLEP_a_00166 · DOI
  4. Bell, 2018, EU ambition to build the world's leading bioeconomy—uncertain times demand innovative and sustainable solutions, New Biotechnol., 40, 25, 10.1016/j.nbt.2017.06.010 · DOI
  5. Biber-Freudenberger, 2018, Sustainability performance of national bio-economies, Sustainability, 10, 1, 10.3390/su10082705 · DOI
  6. Biber-Freudenberger, 2020, Bioeconomy futures: expectation patterns of scientists and practitioners on the sustainability of bio-based transformation, Sustain. Dev., 28, 1, 10.1002/sd.2072 · DOI
  7. Birch, 2006, The neoliberal underpinnings of the bioeconomy: the ideological discourses and practices of economic competitiveness, Genom. Soc. Policy, 2
  8. Birch, 2010, Sustainable capital? The neoliberalization of nature and Knowledge in the European ‘Knowledge-based bio-economy, Sustainability, 2, 2898, 10.3390/su2092898 · DOI
  9. Bößner, 2021, Governing the bioeconomy: what role for international institutions?, Sustainability, 13, 1
  10. Bracco, 2018, Assessing the contribution of bioeconomy to the total economy: a review of national frameworks, Sustainability, 10
  11. Commission on Global Governance. (1994). Our global neighborhood - a new world. Commission on Global Governance. · DOI
  12. Devaney, 2017, Good governance in the bioeconomy, EuroChoices, 16, 41, 10.1111/1746-692X.12141 · DOI
  13. Dietz, 2022, Is private sustainability governance a myth? Evaluating major sustainability certifications in primary production: a mixed methods meta-study, Ecol. Econ., 201, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107546 · DOI
  14. Dietz, 2018, Governance of the bioeconomy: a global comparative study of national bioeconomy strategies, Sustainability, 10, 1, 10.3390/su10093190 · DOI · Paper page
  15. El-Chichakli, 2016, Five cornerstones of a global bioeconomy, Nature, 535, 221, 10.1038/535221a · DOI
  16. EU. (2005). New perspectives on the knowledge-based bio-economy: conference report.
  17. Falcone, 2019, Assessing the opportunities and challenges of green finance in Italy: an analysis of the biomass production sector, Sustainability (Switzerland), 11
  18. Gillingham, 2016, The rebound effect and energy efficiency policy, Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy, 10, 68, 10.1093/reep/rev017 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Haas, 1992, Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination, Int. Organ., 46, 1, 10.1017/S0020818300001442 · DOI
  20. Heimann, 2019, Bioeconomy and SDGs: does the bioeconomy support the achievement of the SDGs?, Earth's Future, 7, 43, 10.1029/2018EF001014 · DOI
  21. Imbert, E., Ladu, L., Morone, P., & Quitzow, R. (2017). Policy strategies for a transition to a bioeconomy in Europe: the case of Italy and Germany. MPRA Paper, 78143. · DOI
  22. Jacomini Berto, 2022, The circular economy, bioeconomy, and green investments: a systematic review of the literature, Revista Gestão Da Produção Operações e Sistemas, 17, 46, 10.15675/gepros.v17i1.2796 · DOI
  23. Juerges, 2018, Soil governance in the transition towards a sustainable bioeconomy – a review, J. Clean. Prod., 170, 1628, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.143 · DOI
  24. Kircher, 2019, Bioeconomy: Markets, implications, and investment opportunities, Economies, 7, 1, 10.3390/economies7030073 · DOI
  25. Kirs, 2021, Transformative change and policy-making: the case of bioeconomy policies in the EU frontrunners and lessons for latecomers, Innov. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. Res.
  26. Kleinschmit, 2017, Environmental concerns in political bioeconomy discourses, Int. For. Rev., 19, 41
  27. Levi-Faur, 2014, The welfare state: a regulatory perspective, Public Adm., 92, 599, 10.1111/padm.12063 · DOI
  28. Lokko, 2018, Biotechnology and the bioeconomy—towards inclusive and sustainable industrial development, New Biotechnol., 40, 5, 10.1016/j.nbt.2017.06.005 · DOI
  29. McCormick, 2013, The bioeconomy in Europe: an overview, Sustainability, 5, 2589, 10.3390/su5062589 · DOI
  30. Meyfroidt, 2020, Focus on leakage and spillovers: Informing land-use governance in a tele-coupled world, Environ. Res. Lett., 15, 10.1088/1748-9326/ab7397 · DOI
  31. Mustalahti, 2018, The responsive bioeconomy: the need for inclusion of citizens and environmental capability in the forest based bioeconomy, J. Clean. Prod., 172, 3781, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.132 · DOI
  32. Patermann, 2018, The origins of the bioeconomy in the European Union, New Biotechnol., 40, 20, 10.1016/j.nbt.2017.04.002 · DOI
  33. Priefer, 2017, Pathways to shape the bioeconomy, Resources, 6, 1, 10.3390/resources6010010 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Rodríguez, 2019, El financiamiento de la bioeconomía en América Latina: Identificación de fuentes nacionales, Regionales y de Cooperación Internacional, 76
  35. Sachs, 2019, Why is green finance important?, SSRN Electron. J., 10.2139/ssrn.3327149 · DOI
  36. Sheppard, 2011, Biosecurity and sustainability within the growing global bioeconomy, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 3, 4, 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.011 · DOI
  37. Siegel, 2022, Fostering transitions towards sustainability? The politics of bioeconomy development in Argentina, Uruguay, and Brazil, Bull. Latin Am. Res., 10.1111/blar.13353 · DOI
  38. Singh, 2021, Policy review for biomass value chains in the European bioeconomy, Global Transit., 3, 13, 10.1016/j.glt.2020.11.003 · DOI
  39. Smolker, 2008, The new bioeconomy and the future of agriculture, Development, 51, 519, 10.1057/dev.2008.67 · DOI
  40. Stark, 2020, Sustainability implications of alternative transformation pathways for the bioeconomy: an interdisciplinary conceptual framework, Sustain. Prod. Consum., 29, 215, 10.1016/j.spc.2021.10.011 · DOI
  41. von Braun, 2014, Bioeconomy and sustainable development – dimensions, Rural, 21, 6
  42. von Braun, 2017, Designing global governance for agricultural development and food and nutrition security, Rev. Dev. Econ., 21, 265, 10.1111/rode.12261 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dietz, T., Rubio Jovel, K., Deciancio, M., Boldt, C., & Börner, J.
ORCID
Venue
EFB Bioeconomy Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-11
Volume
3
Pages
100058
ISSN
2667-0410
DOI
10.1016/j.bioeco.2023.100058
Cited by
28
References
3
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review