Cited by 176Bioeconomy and Sustainability DevelopmentSustainability and Climate Change GovernanceSustainable Development and Environmental Management

A path transition towards a bioeconomy–the crucial role of sustainability

Open access
Gawel, Erik, Pannicke, Nadine, Hagemann, Nina·2019·Sustainability

Abstract

The bioeconomy is a worldwide used strategy to cope with ecological, social, and economic sustainability challenges. However, we analyze current bioeconomy strategies and trends to point out potential sustainability conflicts and transition challenges. Our analysis shows that the bioeconomy is not sustainable per se, as mere input substitution may entail welfare losses. Instead, it requires further debates and actions to avoid exacerbation of ecological and social strains. Sustainability has to be the key concept behind the bioeconomy and predominantly requires (1) sustainability of the resource base and (2) sustainability of processes and products, especially by (3) circular processes of material fluxes, not least to gain consumer acceptance for bio-based products. Otherwise, the bioeconomy would only entail the substitution of fossil resources for bio-based resources potentially lacking the generation of additional societal and ecological benefits and contribution to climate mitigation. As markets alone will not suffice to fulfil this path transition towards a sustainable bioeconomy, we argue that innovative governance is necessary to reduce competitive drawbacks compared to fossil resources (enabling function) and to secure ecological, social, and economic sustainability requirements (limiting function).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su11113005

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The bioeconomy enables the transition from fossil-based to biomass-based industrial inputs and emphasizes the sustainable use of renewable resources for economic, environmental, and social benefits.

    “Similarly, the bioeconomy enables the transition from fossil-based to biomass-based industrial inputs and emphasizes the sustainable use of renewable resources for economic, environmental, and social benefits (Pfau et al., 2014; D'Amato et al., 2018; Gawel et al., 2019).”

    From Circular Bioeconomy Concepts—A Perspective (2021) · cites this paper as Gawel et al., 2019

    The Introduction and Section 2 describe a transition from fossil-based inputs toward bio-based resources and link it to economic, environmental, and societal aims. But the Introduction says renewable resources do not inherently make a bioeconomy sustainable; those benefits depend on sustainable resource use, production, and consumption. The claim overstates this conditional prospect as something the bioeconomy enables and emphasizes as a matter of course. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The bioeconomy is not intrinsically sustainable just because it is based on renewable resources.

    “Some definitions suggest that the bioeconomy is not intrinsically sustainable just because it is based on renewable resources (Pfau et al., 2014; Gawel et al., 2019).”

    From Circular Bioeconomy Concepts—A Perspective (2021) · cites this paper as Gawel et al., 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

41 of the 135 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Ober, S. Nachhaltigkeit in der Bioökonomie. Zusammenfassung und Thesen als Ergebnis eines Workshops auf Vilm 2013; NABU-Bundesverband Naturschutzbund Deutschland (NABU) e.V.: Berlin, Germany, 2014.
  2. Unmüßig, B. Bioeconomy-A dead end. Rural 21 2014, 3, 34-35. Available online: https://www.rural21.com/ uploads/media/rural2014_03-S34-35.pdf (accessed on 29 March 2019).
  3. Müller, A.; Weigelt, J.; Götz, A.; Schmidt, O.; Lobos Alva, I.; Matuschke, I.; Ehling, U.; Beringer, T. The Role of Biomass in the Sustainable Development Goals: A Reality Check and Governance Implications; IASS Working Paper Prepared by the Renewable Resources and the Sustainable Development Goals Forum, Global Soil Forum, Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies e. V. (IASS); Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies e. V. (IASS): Potsdam, Germany, 2015. [CrossRef] · DOI
  4. Wagner, H.-G. Bioökonomie-Über die Pervertierung eines grünen Paradigmas. Zeitschrift für Sozialökonomie (ZfSÖ) 2015, 52, 57-68.
  5. Von Braun, J. Bioeconomy and sustainable development-dimensions. Rural 21 2014, 2, 6-9.
  6. Lewandowski, I., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018. [CrossRef] · DOI
  7. European Commission. New Perspectives on the Knowledge-Based Bioeconomy; Conference Report; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2005.
  8. Lamers, P., Searcy, E., Hess, J.R., Stichnothe, H., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016. [CrossRef] · DOI
  9. Lewandowski, I., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018. [CrossRef] · DOI
  10. Gonzales, N.C. Regulation of bio based economy. The challenges of the local innovation in governance. In Proceedings of the Conference Paper for 5th AIEAA-Conference, The Changing Role of Regulation in the Bio-Based Economy, Bologna, Italy, 16-17 June 2016.
  11. Koppejan, D.; Asveld, L. The public debate: an accumulation of controversies. In Getting to the Core of the Bio-Economy: A Perspective on the Sustainable Promise of Biomass; Asveld, L., van Est, R., Stemerding, D., Eds.; Rathenau Instituut: The Hague, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 55-85.
  12. Pietzsch, J. (Ed.) Bioökonomie für Einsteiger, 1st ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2017.
  13. Karus, M.; Kaub, M. Naturfasern für die Europäische Automobilindustrie; Nova-Institut: Hürth, Germany, 2001. 100. German Advisory Council on Agricultural Policy. Nutrition and Consumer Protection (WBA) and German Advisory Council on Forest Policy (WBW). Klimaschutz in der Land-und Forstwirtschaft sowie den nachgelagerten Bereichen Ernährung und Holzverwendung; InTech Open: Berlin, Germany, 2016. 101. Ludwig, G.; Purkus, N.; Pannicke, N.; Gawel, E. Bauen mit Holz als Beitrag zum Klima-und Ressourcenschutz-Status quo des Rechtsrahmens und Gestaltungsvorschläge. Die öffentliche Verwaltung (DÖV) 2017, 23, 985-995. 102.
  14. Aicher, S., Reinhardt, H.-W., Garrecht, H., Eds.; Springer: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014. 110. Lettau-Tischel, S. Dresden setzt Weltstandards-Leichtbau: Elektromobilität verbindet-Region im Schaufenster Elektromobilität Bayern-Sachsen. Präsentation, Amt für Wirtschaftsförderung Dresden, Germany. 2012. Available online: http://www.mfd-dresden.com/fileadmin/MFD-Dateien/Bilder/PDF/Dresden_Leichtbau_ MFD_2012_deutsch.pdf (accessed on 26 March 2015). 111. Krippner, R. Untersuchungen zu Einsatzmöglichkeiten von Holzleichtbeton im Bereich von Gebäudefassaden. Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Universität München, München, Germany, 2004. 112.
  15. Homami, S.S.; Seydei, M.K.; Moradi, S. Preparation of Wood Plastic Composite from Polyethylene and Bagasse. Middle-East J. Sci. Res. 2013, 14, 453-455. 113.
  16. Leal Filho, W., Pociovalisteanu, D.-M., Borges de Brito, P., Borges de Lima, I., Eds.; World Sustainability Series; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018. [CrossRef] 133. Gawel, E.; Purkus, A.; Pannicke, N.; Hagemann, N. A Governance Framework for a Sustainable Bioeconomy: Insights from the Case of the German Wood-based Bioeconomy. In Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy: Principles, Challenges and Perspectives, 1st ed.; · DOI
  17. Leal Filho, W., Pociovalisteanu, D.-M., Borges de Brito, P., Borges de Lima, I., Eds.; World Sustainability Series; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018. [CrossRef] · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gawel, E., Pannicke, N., & Hagemann, N.
Affiliations
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Gawel, Erik
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-05-28
Volume
11
Issue
11
Pages
3005
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2946868949
Cited by
176
References
135
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 3
FWCI
37.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Qucosa (Saxon State and University Library Dresden) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (031A078A)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Management
Keywords
bioeconomy, bioproducts, circular economy, welfare loss, fossil resource substitution, consumer acceptance, bioeconomy governance, climate change mitigation, sustainability conflicts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review