A path transition towards a bioeconomy–the crucial role of sustainability
Open accessAbstract
The bioeconomy is a worldwide used strategy to cope with ecological, social, and economic sustainability challenges. However, we analyze current bioeconomy strategies and trends to point out potential sustainability conflicts and transition challenges. Our analysis shows that the bioeconomy is not sustainable per se, as mere input substitution may entail welfare losses. Instead, it requires further debates and actions to avoid exacerbation of ecological and social strains. Sustainability has to be the key concept behind the bioeconomy and predominantly requires (1) sustainability of the resource base and (2) sustainability of processes and products, especially by (3) circular processes of material fluxes, not least to gain consumer acceptance for bio-based products. Otherwise, the bioeconomy would only entail the substitution of fossil resources for bio-based resources potentially lacking the generation of additional societal and ecological benefits and contribution to climate mitigation. As markets alone will not suffice to fulfil this path transition towards a sustainable bioeconomy, we argue that innovative governance is necessary to reduce competitive drawbacks compared to fossil resources (enabling function) and to secure ecological, social, and economic sustainability requirements (limiting function).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The bioeconomy enables the transition from fossil-based to biomass-based industrial inputs and emphasizes the sustainable use of renewable resources for economic, environmental, and social benefits.
“Similarly, the bioeconomy enables the transition from fossil-based to biomass-based industrial inputs and emphasizes the sustainable use of renewable resources for economic, environmental, and social benefits (Pfau et al., 2014; D'Amato et al., 2018; Gawel et al., 2019).”
From Circular Bioeconomy Concepts—A Perspective (2021) · cites this paper as Gawel et al., 2019
The Introduction and Section 2 describe a transition from fossil-based inputs toward bio-based resources and link it to economic, environmental, and societal aims. But the Introduction says renewable resources do not inherently make a bioeconomy sustainable; those benefits depend on sustainable resource use, production, and consumption. The claim overstates this conditional prospect as something the bioeconomy enables and emphasizes as a matter of course. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe bioeconomy is not intrinsically sustainable just because it is based on renewable resources.
“Some definitions suggest that the bioeconomy is not intrinsically sustainable just because it is based on renewable resources (Pfau et al., 2014; Gawel et al., 2019).”
From Circular Bioeconomy Concepts—A Perspective (2021) · cites this paper as Gawel et al., 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
A safe operating space for humanity
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/461472a · Cited by 13,333 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The global economy has to feed an increasing world population with a simultaneous rise of the living standard, but is restricted by planetary boundaries [1].”
BackgroundEconomic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention
Arrow, K. (1962) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-15486-9_13 · Cited by 9,693 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Investors are not able to appropriate the whole benefits of investments, which leads to an underinvestment in innovation and learning from a social perspective [140].”
BackgroundCompeting Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events
Arthur, W. B. (1989) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2234208 · Cited by 7,489 · cited 2× · see citing works
“However, fossil resource-based technologies can benefit from past learning effects, increasing returns and network externalities; these interact with the specialised nature of investments to create a technological path dependency [141].”
BackgroundFree competition and the optimal amount of fraud
Darby, M. R., & Karni, E. (1973) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/466756 · Cited by 3,947 · cited 1× · see citing works
“[50,83]), the environmental benefits of bio-based products are even more critical attributes of trust in need of explanations [84,85].”
BackgroundUnruh, G. C. (2000) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/s0301-4215(00)00070-7 · Cited by 3,304 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Without question, the path transition towards a sustainable bioeconomy is a complex process that has to overcome the perpetuated lock-in into fossil resource-based production and consumption structures (“carbon lock-in”, see Reference [130]).”
BackgroundA good life for all within planetary boundaries
O’Neill, D. W., Fanning, A. L., Lamb, W. F., & Steinberger, J. K. (2018) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4 · Cited by 1,779 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Furthermore, sufficiency policy is needed to complement the efficiency policy measures to avoid rebound effects [91,158,159].”
BackgroundA tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy
Jaffe, A., Newell, R., & Stavins, R. (2005) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.027 · Cited by 1,742 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Moreover, investments in innovation and the deployment of innovative technologies give rise to knowledge and learning spillovers, which constitute a positive externality [138,139].”
BackgroundResolution Adopted By The General Assembly
East, E. Y. O. I. A. M. (1984) · International Legal Materials · doi:10.1163/9789004283688_019 · Cited by 1,670 · see citing works
Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources
Sandberg-Mørch, L. (2011) · European Energy & Climate Journal · doi:10.4337/eecj.2011.01.10 · Cited by 1,254
Review of Hydrogels and Aerogels Containing Nanocellulose
Hoare, T., & Cranston, E. (2017) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00531 · Cited by 1,201 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Selected examples, among others, for innovative or reinvented products and applications are cross-laminated timber products in wooden multi story buildings [107,108], shaped wood in cars [109,110], admixture in concrete [111,112], biocomposites such as wood-plastic composites (WPC) or natural fibre reinforced composit…”
BackgroundEnvironmental and technology policies for climate mitigation
Fischer, C., & Newell, R. G. (2008) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2007.11.001 · Cited by 1,157 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Moreover, investments in innovation and the deployment of innovative technologies give rise to knowledge and learning spillovers, which constitute a positive externality [138,139].”
BackgroundHolladay, J. E., White, J. F., Bozell, J. J., & Johnson, D. (2007) · doi:10.2172/921839 · Cited by 905 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In the future, lignin could also be employed to produce for example fine chemicals, bioplastics [106] or glues [116,117].”
BackgroundThe role of biomass and bioenergy in a future bioeconomy: policies and facts
Scarlat, N., Dallemand, J.-F., Monforti-Ferrario, F., & Nita, V. (2015) · Environmental Development · doi:10.1016/j.envdev.2015.03.006 · Cited by 895 · see citing works
What Is the Bioeconomy? A Review of the Literature
Bugge, M. M., Hansen, T., & Klitkou, A. (2016) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su8070691 · Cited by 815 · cited 1× · see citing works
“[44] distinguish between a (i) bio-technology vision (focus on research, application and commercialisation of bio-technology), (ii) bio-resource vision (focus on processing and upgrading of biological raw materials and establishment of new value chains) and (iii) bio-ecology vision (focus on sustainability and ecologi…”
BackgroundCross laminated timber (CLT): overview and development
Brandner, R., Flatscher, G., Ringhofer, A., Schickhofer, G., & Thiel, A. (2015) · European Journal of Wood and Wood Products · doi:10.1007/s00107-015-0999-5 · Cited by 781 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Selected examples, among others, for innovative or reinvented products and applications are cross-laminated timber products in wooden multi story buildings [107,108], shaped wood in cars [109,110], admixture in concrete [111,112], biocomposites such as wood-plastic composites (WPC) or natural fibre reinforced composit…”
BackgroundThe Bioeconomy in Europe: An Overview
McCormick, K., & Kautto, N. (2013) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su5062589 · Cited by 721 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Policies should create opportunities for the society to become engaged [47,68,151] as region-specific bottom-up approaches and social innovation matter in developing a sustainable bioeconomy [79,132].”
BackgroundNatural Fibre Composites and Their Applications: A Review
Peças, P., Carvalho, H., Salman, H., & Leite, M. (2018) · Journal of Composites Science · doi:10.3390/jcs2040066 · Cited by 645 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Selected examples, among others, for innovative or reinvented products and applications are cross-laminated timber products in wooden multi story buildings [107,108], shaped wood in cars [109,110], admixture in concrete [111,112], biocomposites such as wood-plastic composites (WPC) or natural fibre reinforced composit…”
BackgroundFoxon, T., Gross, R., Chase, A., Howes, J., Arnall, A., & Anderson, D. (2005) · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2004.04.011 · Cited by 589
Carbon Emissions of Infrastructure Development
Müller, D. B., Liu, G., Løvik, A. N., Modaresi, R., Pauliuk, S., Steinhoff, F. S., & Brattebø, H. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es402618m · Cited by 442 · see citing works
Staffas, L., Gustavsson, M., & McCormick, K. (2013) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su5062751 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
Visions of sustainability in bioeconomy research
Pfau, S., Hagens, J., Dankbaar, B., & Smits, A. (2014) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su6031222 · Cited by 398 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Reference [21]), consumer acceptance of bio-based products struggles with several challenges (for an overview see Reference [90]), but after all, sustainability is the key for purchasing decisions in favour of the bioeconomy.”
BackgroundJUST OIL? THE DISTRIBUTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACTS OF OIL PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION
O'Rourke, D., & Connolly, S. (2003) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105617 · Cited by 379 · cited 18× · see citing works
“However, conflicts within this triangle of aims and also with further societal aims soon became obvious, and sparked a broad societal and scientific debate about the sustainability risks involved (see References [27–29] for overviews).”
BackgroundInfluentialJenkins, J. (2014) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.02.003 · Cited by 314 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Examples are GHG emissions, land degradation through mining, air pollution or waste generation which give rise to negative externalities, which, in the absence of policy measures, are insufficiently reflected in market prices [135,136].”
BackgroundPolicy: Five cornerstones of a global bioeconomy
El-Chichakli, B., von Braun, J., Lang, C., Barben, D., & Philp, J. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/535221a · Cited by 266 · cited 8×
“As the SDG’s cover nature, economy and society as the three pillars of sustainability, the question remains, how and in what way the bioeconomy can support synergies of diverse sustainability goals from different pillars and thus, help to contribute to as many SDGs as possible.”
BackgroundInfluentialBirch, K., Levidow, L., & Papaioannou, T. (2010) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su2092898 · Cited by 247 · cited 1× · see citing works
“7), own translation) for the “neoliberalization of nature” [41], which secures a “regime of accumulation against major sociopolitical and ecological challenges” [42].”
BackgroundTowards a Bioeconomy in Europe: National, Regional and Industrial Strategies
de Besi, M., & McCormick, K. (2015) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su70810461 · Cited by 245 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Comparing a set of national and international bioeconomy strategies (including those by the German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture [55], the OECD [6] and the EU [2]), De Besi and McCormick find a common focus on “fostering research and innovation, primarily in the field of biotechnology; promoting collaborati…”
BackgroundSustainable development – A ‘selling point’ of the emerging EU bioeconomy policy framework?
Ramcilovic-Suominen, S., & Pülzl, H. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.157 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
The Bio-Economy Concept and Knowledge Base in a Public Goods and Farmer Perspective
Schmid, O., Padel, S., & Levidow, L. (2012) · Bio-based and Applied Economics · doi:10.13128/bae-10770 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Divergent Paradigms of European Agro-Food Innovation
Levidow, L., Birch, K., & Papaioannou, T. (2013) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243912438143 · Cited by 203 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, the bioeconomy can still be seen as a “chameleon of notions” [50] that adapts repeatedly to changing requirements [52]; the meaning of the bioeconomy “still seems in a flux” [56], maybe as a consequence of its role as a “master narrative” attracting rival visions [57].”
BackgroundBioeconomy – an emerging meta-discourse affecting forest discourses?
Pülzl, H., Kleinschmit, D., & Arts, B. (2014) · Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1080/02827581.2014.920044 · Cited by 197 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, the bioeconomy can still be seen as a “chameleon of notions” [50] that adapts repeatedly to changing requirements [52]; the meaning of the bioeconomy “still seems in a flux” [56], maybe as a consequence of its role as a “master narrative” attracting rival visions [57].”
BackgroundThe origins of the bioeconomy in the European Union.
Patermann, C., & Aguilar, A. (2018) · New Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2017.04.002 · Cited by 192 · cited 1×
“Picking up that impulse, in combination with the parallel development of a Strategy on Biotechnology in 2002, this was the foundation for the “Knowledge-based Bioeconomy” (KBBE) in 2005 [53].”
BackgroundSecuring a sustainable biomass supply in a growing bioeconomy
Lewandowski, I. (2015) · Global Food Security · doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2015.10.001 · Cited by 191 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The main constraints for the further development of the bioeconomy sector are impending scarcities of sustainably grown feedstocks for bio-based products due to the insufficient availability and inefficient use of biomass and arable land [31,33].”
BackgroundBiotechnology and the bioeconomy-Towards inclusive and sustainable industrial development.
Lokko, Y., Heijde, M., Schebesta, K., Scholtés, P. R., Montagu, M. V., & Giacca, M. (2018) · New Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2017.06.005 · Cited by 178
Shades of green: a social scientific view on bioeconomy in the forest sector
Kleinschmit, D., Lindstad, B. H., Thorsen, B., Toppinen, A., Roos, A., & Baardsen, S. (2014) · Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1080/02827581.2014.921722 · Cited by 169 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For a holistic understanding and to avoid negligence of potentials for the bioeconomy, all objectives, interests and challenges of the different perspectives on the bioeconomy should be considered [65].”
BackgroundBell, J., Paula, L., Dodd, T., Németh, S., Nanou, C., Mega, V., & Campos, P. (2018) · New Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2017.06.010 · Cited by 159 · cited 9× · see citing works
“As the SDG’s cover nature, economy and society as the three pillars of sustainability, the question remains, how and in what way the bioeconomy can support synergies of diverse sustainability goals from different pillars and thus, help to contribute to as many SDGs as possible.”
BackgroundInfluentialVery tall wooden buildings with cross laminated timber
van de Kuilen, J. G., Ceccotti, A., Xia, Z., & He, M.-J. (2011) · Procedia Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.204 · Cited by 159 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Selected examples, among others, for innovative or reinvented products and applications are cross-laminated timber products in wooden multi story buildings [107,108], shaped wood in cars [109,110], admixture in concrete [111,112], biocomposites such as wood-plastic composites (WPC) or natural fibre reinforced composit…”
BackgroundHossain, E., & Petrovic, S. (2021) · Renewable Energy Crash Course · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-70049-2_5 · Cited by 158
EU agri-innovation policy: two contending visions of the bio-economy
Levidow, L., Birch, K., & Papaioannou, T. (2012) · Critical Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/19460171.2012.659881 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Mustalahti, I. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.132 · Cited by 141 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Instead, there is a low public awareness of the bioeconomy and a need for inclusion of society in discussing the future pathways of the bioeconomy [151,154].”
BackgroundFinnish forest policy in the era of bioeconomy: A pathway to sustainability?
Kröger, M., & Raitio, K. (2017) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2016.12.003 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Peters, J., & Frondel, M. (2007) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.899088 · Cited by 128
Purkus, A., Hagemann, N., Bedtke, N., & Gawel, E. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.146 · Cited by 118 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The governance of the bioeconomy as a “learning system” should gradually, but reliably set impulses for a sustainable transition path [145].”
BackgroundSelf-citationBiotechnology for production of fuels, chemicals, and materials from biomass
Wyman, C., & Goodman, B. J. (1993) · Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/bf02918976 · Cited by 116 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Nevertheless, a sustainable long-term oriented bioeconomy policy requires more: the challenge is to integrate bio-based substitutes into existing markets, where equivalent fossil-based products are well established [143].”
BackgroundPresent and future biodiversity risks from fossil fuel exploitation
Harfoot, M., Tittensor, D., Knight, S., Arnell, A., Blyth, S., Brooks, S., Butchart, S., Hutton, J., Jones, M. I., Kapos, V., et al. (2018) · Conservation Letters · doi:10.1111/conl.12448 · Cited by 115 · cited 18× · see citing works
“However, conflicts within this triangle of aims and also with further societal aims soon became obvious, and sparked a broad societal and scientific debate about the sustainability risks involved (see References [27–29] for overviews).”
BackgroundInfluentialWhat kind of innovation policy does the bioeconomy need?
Schütte, G. (2018) · New Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2017.04.003 · Cited by 107 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Policies should create opportunities for the society to become engaged [47,68,151] as region-specific bottom-up approaches and social innovation matter in developing a sustainable bioeconomy [79,132].”
BackgroundThe Bioeconomy as Political Project
Goven, J., & Pavone, V. (2015) · doi:10.1177/0162243914552133 · Cited by 105
Ingrao, C., Bacenetti, J., Bezama, A., Blok, V., Goglio, P., Koukios, E., Lindner, M., Nemecek, T., Siracusa, V., Zabaniotou, A., et al. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.068 · Cited by 103 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Some authors state promising potentials for the bioeconomy to make a significant contribution to the SDG’s [5,66] and consider the bioeconomy as a valid and reliable way to the transition to equitable, sustainable, post fossil-carbon societies [67,68].”
BackgroundForest bioeconomy - a new scope for sustainability indicators
Wolfslehner, B., Linser, S., Pülzl, H., Bastrup-birk, A., Camia, A., & Marchetti, M. (2016) · doi:10.36333/fs04 · Cited by 95
Siebert, A., Bezama, A., O’Keeffe, S., & Thrän, D. (2018) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-016-1066-0 · Cited by 91 · cited 1× · see citing works
“, social issues would arise as, for example, in terms of land and respective land rights [46] or in the production process [63].”
BackgroundWater and food in the bioeconomy: challenges and opportunities for development
Rosegrant, M., Ringler, C., Zhu, T., Tokgoz, S., & Bhandary, P. (2013) · Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/agec.12058 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
From a Fossil-Fuel to a Biobased Economy: The Politics of Industrial Biotechnology
Richardson, B. (2012) · doi:10.1068/c10209 · Cited by 90
Lignocellulose‐based Chemical Products and Product Family Trees
Kamm, B., Kamm, M., Schmidt, M., Hirth, T., & Schulze, M. (2008) · doi:10.1002/9783527619849.ch20 · Cited by 83 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In the future, lignin could also be employed to produce for example fine chemicals, bioplastics [106] or glues [116,117].”
BackgroundEgea, F. J., Torrente, R. G., & Aguilar, A. (2018) · New Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2017.06.009 · Cited by 74 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This does not only mean political adjustments in single application fields, such as bio-based chemicals or plastics or textiles, but a coherent approach based on sustainability principles that ensures economic returns, avoid environmental problems and meet socioeconomic expectations [156].”
BackgroundZeug, W., Bezama, A., Moesenfechtel, U., Jähkel, A., & Thrän, D. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11061511 · Cited by 71 · cited 6× · see citing works
“However, bioeconomy policies in Germany, the EU and the OECD-countries still focus on the time-honoured understanding of the “knowledge-based bioeconomy” which is predominantly characterized by the substitution of resource inputs and high tech innovations, mainly in the form of biotechnology (e.g., References [2,15]).”
BackgroundInfluentialKallio, A., Solberg, B., Käär, L., & Päivinen, R. (2018) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2018.04.010 · Cited by 69 · cited 1× · see citing works
“, References [127,128]), also economic “co-benefits” of the bioeconomy, such as employment, rural value creation, economic growth or impulses for technological progress could be forfeited [129].”
BackgroundFritsche, U., & Iriarte, L. (2014) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en7116825 · Cited by 69 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Despite the fact that there are other levels of governance and other initiatives that may shape the bioeconomy, Fritsche and Iriarte [46] suggest to acknowledge and extend the binding sustainability requirements specifically targeted to biomass for bioenergy in developing a sustainable bioeconomy in order to avoid rei…”
BackgroundForest Carbon Leakage Quantification Methods and Their Suitability for Assessing Leakage in REDD
Henders, S., & Ostwald, M. (2012) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f3010033 · Cited by 68 · cited 18× · see citing works
“However, conflicts within this triangle of aims and also with further societal aims soon became obvious, and sparked a broad societal and scientific debate about the sustainability risks involved (see References [27–29] for overviews).”
BackgroundInfluentialStappen, F. V., Brose, I., & Schenkel, Y. (2011) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.07.015 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Not so sustainable? Images of bioeconomy by future environmental professionals and citizens
Vainio, A., Ovaska, U., & Varho, V. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.290 · Cited by 68 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, as the bioeconomy is in the ungrateful role as a straggler of bioenergy, it has got the problem that sustainability, in particular a sustainable renewable resource base, is doubted in public perception [17] so that it is hard to gain credibility and acceptance for a sustainability improvement by means of the…”
BackgroundA Sustainable Bioeconomy: The Green Industrial Revolution
Sillanpää, M., & Ncibi, C. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-55637-6 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
How effective are the sustainability criteria accompanying the European Union 2020 biofuel targets?
Frank, S., Böttcher, H., Havlík, P., Valin, H., Mosnier, A., Obersteiner, M., Schmid, E., & Elbersen, B. (2013) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01188.x · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Industry expectations regarding the transition toward a biobased economy
Vandermeulen, V., van der Steen, M., Stevens, C. V., & Huylenbroeck, G. V. (2012) · Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.1333 · Cited by 59 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In a nutshell, as features of bio-based products are similar to fossil-based ones [87], but are offered for higher prices [88,89] and may cause sustainability concerns (cf.”
BackgroundEmergent Imaginaries and Fragmented Policy Frameworks in the Canadian Bio-Economy
Birch, K. (2016) · doi:10.3390/su8101007 · Cited by 52 · cited 1×
“Birch [64] differentiates between four definitions of the bioeconomy: (i) Product definition (bio-based products), (ii) substitution definition (substitution of fossil resources for bio-based ones), (iii) renewable-sustainable definition (critical debate whether renewable = sustainable) and (iv) societal transition de…”
BackgroundUnderstanding Perceptions of the Bioeconomy in Austria—An Explorative Case Study
Stern, T., Ploll, U., Spies, R., Schwarzbauer, P., Hesser, F., & Ranacher, L. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10114142 · Cited by 48 · cited 2×
“Instead, there is a low public awareness of the bioeconomy and a need for inclusion of society in discussing the future pathways of the bioeconomy [151,154].”
BackgroundThe price for biofuels sustainability.
Pacini, H., Assunção, L., van Dam, J. V., & Toneto, R. (2013) · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.042 · Cited by 48 · cited 1×
“In a nutshell, as features of bio-based products are similar to fossil-based ones [87], but are offered for higher prices [88,89] and may cause sustainability concerns (cf.”
BackgroundHildebrandt, J., O'Keeffe, S., Bezama, A., & Thrän, D. (2018) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12818 · Cited by 46 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In this light, incentives for the formation and development of industrial symbiosis in the bioeconomy network can support the integration of different processes and material streams and thus, save costs and mitigate environmental impacts of the production system [157].”
BackgroundThe Political Economy of Fostering a Wood-based Bioeconomy in Germany
Pannicke, N., Gawel, E., Hagemann, N., Purkus, A., & Strunz, S. (2015) · German Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.270182 · Cited by 43 · cited 5× · see citing works
“For a credible and reliable transition policy, societal acceptance and a broad coalition of interests which support associated policy changes is of crucial importance [71,79,144].”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationDrumming the Barrels of Hope? Bioeconomy Narratives in the Media
Peltomaa, J. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10114278 · Cited by 41 · cited 3×
“, German bioeconomy policy and research strategies and those of the German federal states) point to several problems, such as (i) an insufficient consideration of conflicts between environmental and economic policy aims; (ii) open questions on how to effectively safeguard environmental boundaries and global food secur…”
BackgroundPyka, A., & Prettner, K. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-68152-8_11 · Cited by 41 · cited 4× · see citing works
“For a credible and reliable transition policy, societal acceptance and a broad coalition of interests which support associated policy changes is of crucial importance [71,79,144].”
BackgroundInfluentialSantarius, T. (2014) · doi:10.14512/gaia.23.2.8 · Cited by 40 · cited 1×
“Moreover, a sustainable development of the bioeconomy requires innovative technical and, above all, political solutions for stimulating a change of consumption patterns and the use of waste and recycling material, taking into account possible rebound effects [91,92].”
BackgroundUnderstanding the systems that characterise the circular economy and the bioeconomy
Bezama, A. (2018) · Waste Management Research · doi:10.1177/0734242x18787954 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Sustainability or Collapse? An Integrated History and Future of People on Earth
Guerrini, A. (2009) · Annals of Science · doi:10.1080/00033790701786805 · Cited by 34 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Even if we leave the “sustainability or collapse” narrative [80] behind, environmental changes resulting from human activities will, sooner or later, require transformation and/or reorganisation of economic habits and lifestyles (cf.”
BackgroundThatcher, A. (2014) · doi:10.4122/dtu:2466 · Cited by 31 · cited 1×
“Despite several points of critique [49] and for reasons of straightforwardness and tangibility, we focus on the three pillar model in this paper and do not take the numerous suggested approaches and models for sustainability and sustainable development into further consideration (for an overview in the bioeconomy cont…”
BackgroundLignocelluloses Feedstock Biorefinery as Petrorefinery Substitutes
Cheng, H.-B., & Wang, L. (2013) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/51491 · Cited by 31 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Wood-based products act as temporary carbon sinks due to the assimilation and storage of carbon in wood and therefore often show better GHG-balances than fossil resource substitutes [55,98].”
BackgroundO'Brien, M., & Bringezu, S. (2017) · doi:10.3390/su9050812 · Cited by 24 · cited 18×
“However, conflicts within this triangle of aims and also with further societal aims soon became obvious, and sparked a broad societal and scientific debate about the sustainability risks involved (see References [27–29] for overviews).”
BackgroundInfluentialSustainability driven new business models in wood construction towards 2030
Toppinen, A., Autio, M., Sauru, M., & Berghäll, S. (2018) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-73028-8_25 · Cited by 20 · cited 1×
“It shows a growing awareness of current environmental problems and the willingness to counteract, but several existing barriers need to be removed to reach more people to ensure further progress [101,155].”
BackgroundFrom petrochemistry to biotech: a European perspective on the bio-based economy
Landeweerd, L., Surette, M., & van Driel, C. (2011) · Interface Focus · doi:10.1098/rsfs.2010.0014 · Cited by 20 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The main constraints for the further development of the bioeconomy sector are impending scarcities of sustainably grown feedstocks for bio-based products due to the insufficient availability and inefficient use of biomass and arable land [31,33].”
BackgroundLeaving the “sustainability or collapse” narrative behind
Strunz, S., Marselle, M., & Schröter, M. (2019) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-019-00673-0 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
A Re-Examination of the Structural Diversity of Biobased Activities and Regions across the EU
Philippidis, G., & Sanjuán-López, A. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10114325 · Cited by 18 · cited 1×
“Despite high variations between different regions in the EU, bio-based sectors contribute to economic development especially in regions affected by structural changes accelerated by the financial crisis [152].”
BackgroundOne Century of Bioenergy in Germany: Wildcard and Advanced Technology
Pfeiffer, D., & Thrän, D. (2018) · Chemie Ingenieur Technik · doi:10.1002/cite.201800154 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Gawel, E., Purkus, A., Pannicke, N., & Hagemann, N. (2018) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-73028-8_26 · Cited by 14 · cited 3×
“Markets alone will not suffice to fulfil the enabling and limiting functions of bioeconomy governance because of a number of interacting market failures regarding extraction, processing and use of fossil resources [71,133,134].”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationAdvancements for the Structural Application of Fiber-Reinforced Moulded Wooden Tubes
Wehsener, J., Werner, T., Hartig, J., & Haller, P. (2014) · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7811-5_9 · Cited by 14 · cited 1×
“Selected examples, among others, for innovative or reinvented products and applications are cross-laminated timber products in wooden multi story buildings [107,108], shaped wood in cars [109,110], admixture in concrete [111,112], biocomposites such as wood-plastic composites (WPC) or natural fibre reinforced composit…”
BackgroundHolzeinsatz im Bauwesen - Verwendungsstrukturen nach Gebäuden und GewerkenPreprint
Mantau, U., Döring, P., & Hiller, D. (2013) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.3220/rep_9_2013 · Cited by 13 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Reference [102]), the use of wood in multi-storey residential buildings is also increasing.”
BackgroundBioökonomie am Scheideweg Industrialisierung von Biomasse oder nachhaltige Produktion
Albrecht, S., Gottschick, M., Schorling, M., & Stirn, S. (2012) · doi:10.14512/gaia.21.1.10 · Cited by 12 · cited 1×
“, German bioeconomy policy and research strategies and those of the German federal states) point to several problems, such as (i) an insufficient consideration of conflicts between environmental and economic policy aims; (ii) open questions on how to effectively safeguard environmental boundaries and global food secur…”
BackgroundBioeconomy Meets the Circular Economy: The RESYNTEX and FORCE Projects
Leal, W. (2018) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-73028-8_29 · Cited by 11 · cited 1×
“The discourse about a sustainable bioeconomy needs to be linked with expanding the circular flow economy, to reduce pressures on ecosystems that provide primary biomass resources [93].”
BackgroundRanacher, L., Höfferer, K., Lettner, M., Hesser, F., Stern, T., Rauter, R., & Schwarzbauer, P. (2018) · Die Bodenkultur Journal of Land Management Food and Environment · doi:10.2478/boku-2018-0005 · Cited by 11 · cited 1× · see citing works
“[50,83]), the environmental benefits of bio-based products are even more critical attributes of trust in need of explanations [84,85].”
BackgroundRudolph, K. (2018) · World sustainability series · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-73028-8_7 · Cited by 9 · cited 1× · see citing works
“[160,161]) and to create credibility and acceptance for the bioeconomy.”
BackgroundConstructing a Sustainable Bioeconomy: Multi-scalar Perceptions of Sustainability
Banerjee, A., Schelly, C., & Halvorsen, K. E. (2018) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-73028-8_19 · Cited by 8 · cited 1×
“Policies should create opportunities for the society to become engaged [47,68,151] as region-specific bottom-up approaches and social innovation matter in developing a sustainable bioeconomy [79,132].”
BackgroundBiorenewables, the bio-based economy and sustainability
Templer, R., & van der Wielen, L. V. D. (2011) · Interface Focus · doi:10.1098/rsfs.2011.0001 · Cited by 7
Environmental Economics, the Bioeconomy and the Role of Government
Ahlheim, M. (2018) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-68152-8_10 · Cited by 6 · cited 1×
“Markets alone will not suffice to fulfil the enabling and limiting functions of bioeconomy governance because of a number of interacting market failures regarding extraction, processing and use of fossil resources [71,133,134].”
BackgroundTransition Strategies: Resource Mobilization Through Merchandisable Feedstock Intermediates
Lamers, P., Searcy, E., & Hess, J. R. (2016) · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-805165-8.00008-2 · Cited by 5 · cited 1×
“, Reference [78]): The “sustainability joker” biotechnology as a high-tech sector may raise huge sustainability risks, especially when upscaling biotechnological processes to an industrial scale as these may absorb any natural resources indifferentiatedly, just like a vacuum cleaner (cf.”
BackgroundOptions for Designing a New Political Framework of the European Biobased Economy
Carus, M., Dammer, L., & Essel, R. (2014) · doi:10.1089/ind.2014.1538 · Cited by 4
Sustainability, polysaccharide science, and bio-economy.
ten Bos, R., & van Dam, J. (2013) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.087 · Cited by 3
Flagged first, then by citations
41 of the 135 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Ober, S. Nachhaltigkeit in der Bioökonomie. Zusammenfassung und Thesen als Ergebnis eines Workshops auf Vilm 2013; NABU-Bundesverband Naturschutzbund Deutschland (NABU) e.V.: Berlin, Germany, 2014.
- Unmüßig, B. Bioeconomy-A dead end. Rural 21 2014, 3, 34-35. Available online: https://www.rural21.com/ uploads/media/rural2014_03-S34-35.pdf (accessed on 29 March 2019).
- Müller, A.; Weigelt, J.; Götz, A.; Schmidt, O.; Lobos Alva, I.; Matuschke, I.; Ehling, U.; Beringer, T. The Role of Biomass in the Sustainable Development Goals: A Reality Check and Governance Implications; IASS Working Paper Prepared by the Renewable Resources and the Sustainable Development Goals Forum, Global Soil Forum, Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies e. V. (IASS); Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies e. V. (IASS): Potsdam, Germany, 2015. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Wagner, H.-G. Bioökonomie-Über die Pervertierung eines grünen Paradigmas. Zeitschrift für Sozialökonomie (ZfSÖ) 2015, 52, 57-68.
- Von Braun, J. Bioeconomy and sustainable development-dimensions. Rural 21 2014, 2, 6-9.
- Lewandowski, I., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018. [CrossRef] · DOI
- European Commission. New Perspectives on the Knowledge-Based Bioeconomy; Conference Report; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2005.
- Lamers, P., Searcy, E., Hess, J.R., Stichnothe, H., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Lewandowski, I., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Gonzales, N.C. Regulation of bio based economy. The challenges of the local innovation in governance. In Proceedings of the Conference Paper for 5th AIEAA-Conference, The Changing Role of Regulation in the Bio-Based Economy, Bologna, Italy, 16-17 June 2016.
- Koppejan, D.; Asveld, L. The public debate: an accumulation of controversies. In Getting to the Core of the Bio-Economy: A Perspective on the Sustainable Promise of Biomass; Asveld, L., van Est, R., Stemerding, D., Eds.; Rathenau Instituut: The Hague, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 55-85.
- Pietzsch, J. (Ed.) Bioökonomie für Einsteiger, 1st ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2017.
- Karus, M.; Kaub, M. Naturfasern für die Europäische Automobilindustrie; Nova-Institut: Hürth, Germany, 2001. 100. German Advisory Council on Agricultural Policy. Nutrition and Consumer Protection (WBA) and German Advisory Council on Forest Policy (WBW). Klimaschutz in der Land-und Forstwirtschaft sowie den nachgelagerten Bereichen Ernährung und Holzverwendung; InTech Open: Berlin, Germany, 2016. 101. Ludwig, G.; Purkus, N.; Pannicke, N.; Gawel, E. Bauen mit Holz als Beitrag zum Klima-und Ressourcenschutz-Status quo des Rechtsrahmens und Gestaltungsvorschläge. Die öffentliche Verwaltung (DÖV) 2017, 23, 985-995. 102.
- Aicher, S., Reinhardt, H.-W., Garrecht, H., Eds.; Springer: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014. 110. Lettau-Tischel, S. Dresden setzt Weltstandards-Leichtbau: Elektromobilität verbindet-Region im Schaufenster Elektromobilität Bayern-Sachsen. Präsentation, Amt für Wirtschaftsförderung Dresden, Germany. 2012. Available online: http://www.mfd-dresden.com/fileadmin/MFD-Dateien/Bilder/PDF/Dresden_Leichtbau_ MFD_2012_deutsch.pdf (accessed on 26 March 2015). 111. Krippner, R. Untersuchungen zu Einsatzmöglichkeiten von Holzleichtbeton im Bereich von Gebäudefassaden. Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Universität München, München, Germany, 2004. 112.
- Homami, S.S.; Seydei, M.K.; Moradi, S. Preparation of Wood Plastic Composite from Polyethylene and Bagasse. Middle-East J. Sci. Res. 2013, 14, 453-455. 113.
- Leal Filho, W., Pociovalisteanu, D.-M., Borges de Brito, P., Borges de Lima, I., Eds.; World Sustainability Series; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018. [CrossRef] 133. Gawel, E.; Purkus, A.; Pannicke, N.; Hagemann, N. A Governance Framework for a Sustainable Bioeconomy: Insights from the Case of the German Wood-based Bioeconomy. In Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy: Principles, Challenges and Perspectives, 1st ed.; · DOI
- Leal Filho, W., Pociovalisteanu, D.-M., Borges de Brito, P., Borges de Lima, I., Eds.; World Sustainability Series; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018. [CrossRef] · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Benalaya, I., Alves, G., Lopes, J., & Silva, L. R. (2024) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms25021322 · Cited by 434
“A semi-crystalline polymer, starch is composed α glycosidic groups: points”
BackgroundCircular Bioeconomy Concepts—A Perspective
Tan, E. C. D., & Lamers, P. (2021) · Frontiers in Sustainability · doi:10.3389/frsus.2021.701509 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
“Similarly, the bioeconomy enables the transition from fossil-based to biomass-based industrial inputs and emphasizes the sustainable use of renewable resources for economic, environmental, and social benefits (Pfau et al., 2014; D’Amato et al., 2018; Gawel et al., 2019).”
Backgroundda Silva, A. S., Espinheira, R. P., Teixeira, R. S. S., de Souza, M. F., Ferreira-Leitão, V., & Bon, E. (2020) · Biotechnology for Biofuels · doi:10.1186/s13068-020-01697-w · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Osman, O., Sgouridis, S. P., & Sleptchenko, A. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121627 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Wagh, M. S., S, S., Nath, P., Chakraborty, A., Amrit, R., Mishra, B., Mishra, A. K., & Mohanta, Y. K. (2024) · Chemical engineering research & design · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2024.01.055 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Venkatesh, G. (2021) · Circular Economy and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s43615-021-00084-3 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
“(Germans especially) as a policy matter, it has been, by default, applied to bio-based materials, especially wood from the forestry sector [203, 204, 318, 332], with the”
BackgroundBioeconomy of Sustainability: Drivers, Opportunities and Policy Implications
D’Adamo, I., Gastaldi, M., Morone, P., Rosa, P., Sassanelli, C., Settembre‐Blundo, D., & Shen, Y. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14010200 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Perdomo, F. A., & González‐Curbelo, M. Á. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15065026 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
“Three approaches must be promoted to move the circular bioeconomy toward sustainability: sustainability of the bioresource base, sustainability of processes and products, and sustainability of circular processes of material flows [84].”
BackgroundLinser, S., & Lier, M. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12072898 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
“Sustainable development is an integral part of the bioeconomy [15].”
BackgroundRamcilovic-Suominen, S. (2022) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-022-01091-5 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
“My argument is not for the EU bioeconomy and EU societies to adopt animism, but for human–nature narrowly framed relations to be re-examined (Gebara 2021).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe bioeconomy and its untenable growth promises: reality checks from research
Eversberg, D., Holz, J., & Pungas, L. (2022) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-022-01237-5 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
“Fully substituting bio-based and renewable materials and energy for the enormous and still-increasing volumes of fossil resources currently used while remaining on a growth trajectory is assessed as unrealistic by many experts (Hausknost et al. 2017; Grunwald 2020; Gawel et al. 2019).”
Stephenson, P. J., & Damerell, A. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su141710643 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
“As a result, it is clear that the bioeconomy is not necessarily sustainable and the economic aspects are usually given more attention than sustainability-related issues and biodiversity [55,69,70].”
BackgroundBioeconomy development factors in the European Union and Poland
Woźniak, E., Tyczewska, A., & Twardowski, T. (2020) · New Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2020.07.004 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Prospectives for the development of a circular bioeconomy around the banana value chain
Fiallos-Cárdenas, M., Pérez-Martínez, S., & Ramirez, A. D. (2021) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2021.12.014 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Plant Polysaccharides in Engineered Pharmaceutical Gels
Bahú, J. O., de Andrade, L. R. M., Barbosa, R. D. M., Crivellin, S., da Silva, A. P., Souza, S. D. A., Concha, V. O. C., Severino, P., & Souto, E. (2022) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering9080376 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“Biotechnology has focused on plant polysaccharides to obtain innovative products to apply them following the bioeconomy principles, for which a set of practices are based on the intelligent use of natural resources, to satisfy current needs while guaranteeing resources for future generations [14].”
BackgroundInfluentialBezama, A., Ingrao, C., O’Keeffe, S., & Thrän, D. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11247235 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
A readiness level framework for sustainable circular bioeconomy
Holden, N. M. (2022) · EFB Bioeconomy Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bioeco.2022.100031 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Barañano, L., Garbisu, N., Alkorta, I., Araújo, A., & Garbisu, C. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13147746 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Perspectives on the bioeconomy as an emerging policy field
Vogelpohl, T., & Töller, A. E. (2021) · doi:10.1080/1523908x.2021.1901394 · Cited by 36
“…the ‘right’ governance structures and policy instruments to bring about technological innovation, economic efficiency, societal participation and ecological sustainability (see, e.g. Devaney et al., 2017; Gawel et al., 2019; Maes & van Passel, 2019; Mustalahti, 2018; Philp, 2015; Schütte, 2018).”
BackgroundPolicy Coherence and the Transition to a Bioeconomy: The Case of Ireland
Kelleher, L., Henchion, M., & O'Neill, E. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11247247 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
“A central issue is the trade-offs necessary to mitigate conflict that might arise between relevant policies [17].”
BackgroundLiobikienė, G., & Miceikienė, A. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15097139 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Transition to a Sustainable Bioeconomy
Hinderer, S., Brändle, L., & Kuckertz, A. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13158232 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“However, to integrate both positions, governments may need to play a stronger role in the bioeconomy transition [38,39] to fulfill a two-fold function: on the one hand, an enabling function to level the field for biobased products and to compensate for competitive disadvantages in comparison to fossil-based products;…”
BackgroundWilke, U., Schlaile, M. P., Urmetzer, S., Müller, M., Bogner, K., & Pyka, A. (2021) · Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10806-021-09861-4 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Innovations in Forest Bioeconomy: A Bibliometric Analysis
Jankovský, M., García-Jácome, S. P., Dvořák, J., Nyarko, I., & Hájek, M. (2021) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f12101392 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Understanding deforestation lock-in: Insights from Land Reform settlements in the Brazilian Amazon
Russo Lopes, G., & Bastos Lima, M. G. (2022) · Frontiers in Forests and Global Change · doi:10.3389/ffgc.2022.951290 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“, 2017), agri-food systems (El Bilali, 2019), and the bioeconomy (Gawel et al., 2019).”
BackgroundDietz, T., Rubio‐Jovel, K., Deciancio, M., Boldt, C., & Börner, J. (2023) · EFB Bioeconomy Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bioeco.2023.100058 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Trends and policy in bioeconomy literature: a bibliometric review
Gould, H., Kelleher, L., & O'Neill, E. (2023) · EFB Bioeconomy Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bioeco.2023.100047 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Sinkko, T., Sanyé-Mengual, E., Corrado, S., Giuntoli, J., & Sala, S. (2023) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2023.02.015 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Jose, D., Sivakumar, R., Agarwal, M., Arshad, N., Gunduppali, M., Thiagamani, S. M. K., Venkatachalam, P., Amornraksa, S., & Sriariyanun, M. (2025) · Sustainable Chemistry for Climate Action · doi:10.1016/j.scca.2025.100069 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Fashioning the Future: Green chemistry and engineering innovations in biofashion
Voukkali, I., Papamichael, I., Loizia, P., Economou, F., Stylianou, M., Naddeo, V., & Zorpas, A. (2024) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2024.155039 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Alazzam, F., Aldrou, K., Berezivskyy, Z., Zaverbnyj, A., & Borutska, Y. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Impacts · doi:10.18280/ijei.060401 · Cited by 26
“According to scientific sources [20-22], the bioeconomy relies heavily on knowledge.”
How much wood can we expect from European forests in the near future?
Lerink, B., Schelhaas, M., Schreiber, R., Aurenhammer, P., Kies, U., Vuillermoz, M., Ruch, P., Pupin, C., Kitching, A., Kerr, G., et al. (2023) · Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1093/forestry/cpad009 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Green extraction technologies: A path to the Amazon bioeconomy development
Freitas, L. C., dos Santos, R. W. S., Reis, F. R., Haminiuk, C., Corazza, M., & Masson, M. L. (2024) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2024.104462 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Recent Developments in Low iLUC Policies and Certification in the EU Biobased Economy
Sumfleth, B., Majer, S., & Thrän, D. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12198147 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“Certification is mandatory within the RED and can be an important safeguard mechanism to ensure a certain level of sustainability and to verify compliance with sustainability criteria [63].”
BackgroundSustainable Chemistry in Adaptive Agriculture: A Review
Chojnacka, K. (2024) · Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.cogsc.2024.100898 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Bio-inspired designs: leveraging biological brilliance in mechanical engineering—an overview
Fattepur, G., Patil, A. Y., Kumar, P., Kumar, A., Hegde, C., Siddhalingeshwar, I. G., Kumar, R., & Khan, T. M. Y. (2024) · 3 Biotech · doi:10.1007/s13205-024-04153-w · Cited by 22 · see citing works
““Furthermore, the ascent in investigations into bio-mimetic materials and architecture heralds a transition towards practices that are both ecologically consid-erate and functionally superior (Gawel et al. 2019).”
Addressing Stakeholder Concerns Regarding the Effective Use of Bio-Based and Biodegradable Plastics
Fletcher, C., Niemenoja, K., Hunt, R., Adams, J., Dempsey, A., & Banks, C. (2021) · Resources · doi:10.3390/resources10100095 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Adamseged, M. E., & Grundmann, P. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12219018 · Cited by 22
The Bioeconomy Transition Process: Sailing through Storms and Doldrums in Unknown Waters
Pyka, A., Ari, E., Alva-Ferrari, A., & Urmetzer, S. (2020) · Journal of Innovation Economics & Management · doi:10.3917/jie.pr1.0110 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
New Forms of Land Grabbing Due to the Bioeconomy: The Case of Brazil
Cudlínová, E., Sobrinho, V. G., Lapka, M., & Salvati, L. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12083395 · Cited by 20
Wibowo, Y. G., & Sadikin, A. (2019) · Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia · doi:10.22219/jpbi.v5i2.7956 · Cited by 19
Neill, A., O’Donoghue, C., & Stout, J. C. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12198033 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“The modern conceptualisation of the bioeconomy is still emerging with an uncertain trajectory towards new biotechnological capabilities, resource demands, and public acceptance [9].”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Impact of Natural Disturbances on the Central European Timber Market—An Analytical Study
Březina, D., Michal, J., & Hlaváčková, P. (2024) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f15040592 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“However, the rapidly increasing demand combined with over-harvesting due to calamity situations in Europe threatens sustainability and the objectives of the Green Deal for Europe [17] and also leads to excessive carbon release into the atmosphere, as reported in [18].”
BackgroundThreatened sustainability: extractivist tendencies in the forest-based bioeconomy in Finland
Holz, J. (2023) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-023-01300-9 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Baasch, S. (2021) · doi:10.1080/1523908x.2021.1888701 · Cited by 17
“Bioenergy policy, both as part of a broad bioeconomy-oriented policy and renewable energy transition, is strongly related to high expectations regarding goals such as climate protection through greenhouse gas mitigation, energy security, and rural development (Gawel et al., 2019).”
BackgroundInfluentialForster, E. J., Styles, D., & Healey, J. R. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-58463-5 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Combining agroecology and bioeconomy to meet the societal challenges of agriculture
Faucon, M., Aussenac, T., Debref, R., Firmin, S., Houben, D., Marraccini, E., Sauvée, L., Trinsoutrot-Gattin, I., & Gloaguen, R. (2023) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-023-06294-y · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“Indeed both agroecology and bioeconomy require transitions to innovative farming practices or sup-ply-chains (Donner and De Vries 2023; Gawel et al. 2019; Magrini et al. 2019a, b), but this deployment has its own business rationale.”
Backgroundda Silva, R. A. L., Robert, R. C. G., & Purfürst, T. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15118988 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Conceptualizing controversies in the EU circular bioeconomy transition
Starke, J. R., Metze, T., Candel, J., & Termeer, C. (2022) · Ambio · doi:10.1007/s13280-022-01730-2 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“The large-scale production of bioresources as industrial feedstock can entail trade-offs, for example regarding biodiversity conservation, environmental quality, and resulting human welfare (Gawel et al. 2019; Buchmann-Duck and Beazley 2020).”
BackgroundAntecedents for circular bioeconomy practices towards sustainability of supply chain
Moktadir, M. A., Dwivedi, A., & Rahman, T. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131329 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Financial constraints and sustainability in bioeconomy firms
Miranda-García, M., & Segovia‐Vargas, M. (2024) · Global Policy · doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13405 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Thriving in Circularity: Vitality of Business Models development in Circular (Bio)Economy
Papamichael, I., Voukkali, I., Economou, F., Naddeo, V., Sospiro, P., Liscio, M., Zarra, T., & Zorpas, A. (2024) · Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.cogsc.2024.100934 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Assessment of the Development of Forest-Based Bioeconomy in European Regions
Barañano, L., Unamunzaga, O., Garbisu, N., Briers, S., Orfanidou, T., Schmid, B., de Arano, I. M., Araújo, A., & Garbisu, C. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14084747 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Introducing a Multiscalar Framework for Biocluster Research: A Meta-Analysis
Ayrapetyan, D., & Hermans, F. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12093890 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“These concepts become central to our research design as a means to better understand the biocluster-internal aspects, and the di ff erent connections of bioclusters to the outside world.”
BackgroundBioeconomy—Spatial Requirements for Sustainable Development
Grossauer, F., & Stoeglehner, G. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12051877 · Cited by 15
Towards a sustainable bioeconomy in a post-oil era Nigeria
Aworunse, O. S., Olorunsola, H. A., Ahuekwe, E. F., & Obembe, O. (2023) · Resources, Environment and Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.resenv.2022.100094 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Pérez-Morales, G., Poggi-Varaldo, H., Ponce-Noyola, T., Pérez-Valdespino, A., Curiel-Quesada, E., Galíndez-Mayer, J., Ruiz-Ordaz, N., & Sotelo-Navarro, P. (2024) · Fermentation · doi:10.3390/fermentation10060305 · Cited by 14
“Native hyaluronic acid-producing bacteria 3.3.”
InfluentialThomchick, E., Jacobson, M. W., & Ruamsook, K. (2024) · EFB Bioeconomy Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bioeco.2024.100068 · Cited by 14
Inter-connected challenges: an overview of bioeconomy in Europe
Morone, P., D'Adamo, I., & Cianfroni, M. (2022) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac9dac · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“The bioeconomy is sustainable when certain conditions are met: (a) sustainability of processes and products; (b) sustainability of the resource base and (c) circular processes of material flows (Gawel et al 2019).”
BackgroundDownscaling EU Bioeconomy Policy for National Implementation
Faulkner, J., Murphy, E., & Scott, M. (2024) · Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy · doi:10.1016/j.clcb.2024.100121 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Senko, S., & Pykäläinen, J. (2020) · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102311 · Cited by 13
Hlangwani, E., Mpye, K. L., Matsuro, L., & Dlamini, B. C. (2023) · Sustainability Science Practice and Policy · doi:10.1080/15487733.2023.2200300 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“The European Commission describes the bioeco-nomy as the knowledge-based “production of renewable biological resources and the conversion of these resources and waste streams into value-added products, such as food, feed, bio-based products, and bioenergy” (Gawel, Pannicke, and Hagemann 2019).”
BackgroundBioeconomy—A Systematic Literature Review on Spatial Aspects and a Call for a New Research Agenda
Grossauer, F., & Stoeglehner, G. (2023) · Land · doi:10.3390/land12010234 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Advances in Biotechnology in the Circular Economy: A Path to the Sustainable Use of Resources
Marques, P. C., Fernandes, P. C. B., Sampaio, P., & Silva, J. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17146391 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Patel, N., Feofilovs, M., & Blumberga, D. (2022) · Journal of Agriculture and Food Research · doi:10.1016/j.jafr.2022.100367 · Cited by 11
Bioeconomy - present status and future needs of industrial value chains.
Kircher, M. (2021) · New Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2020.09.005 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Pashakolaie, V. G., Gonella, S., & Muhit, I. B. (2025) · Bioresource Technology Reports · doi:10.1016/j.biteb.2025.102125 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Silva, D. A., Vásquez-Ibarra, L., Farrapo, A. C., & Musule-Lagunes, R. (2024) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-024-02333-7 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“…the development of studies addressing the bioeconomy and its associated products has increased during the last years (Di Letizia et al. 2023; Gawel et al. 2019; Liobikiene et al. 2019; Wohlfahrt et al. 2019; Farrapo et al. Jr 2023), focusing mainly on the economic and environmental…”
Research approaches to sustainable forest-based value creation: A literature review
Rusanen, K., Hujala, T., & Pykäläinen, J. (2024) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103222 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Slavec, A., Hoeben, A., Torres, M. M., Primožič, L., & Stern, T. (2023) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2023.103074 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Standardisation in the context of science and regulation: An analysis of the Bioeconomy
Gottinger, A., Ladu, L., & Blind, K. (2023) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2023.06.013 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Ardiyanto, S. Y., Saraswati, R., & Soponyono, E. (2022) · Environment and Ecology Research · doi:10.13189/eer.2022.100403 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“In addition, forest destruction has resulted in floods, droughts and fires which disrupt the social and economic conduciveness of the affected areas [19, 20].”
BackgroundWen, L.-J., & Chatalova, L. (2021) · doi:10.3390/su13020733 · Cited by 10
“In the initiated transition to an innovation-driven and bio-based economy, particularly high expectations are attached to agriculture as a biomass supplier, one of the largest contributors to greenhouse gas savings and job creation in rural areas [98,105,106].”
BackgroundBozzolan, N., Mohren, F., Grassi, G., Schelhaas, M., Staritsky, I., Stern, T., Peltoniemi, M., Šebeň, V., Hassegawa, M., Verkerk, P. J., et al. (2024) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103358 · Cited by 9
Siegfried, K., Blümel, L., Riedel, F., Moosmann, D., Cyffka, K.-F., Richters, M., Reumerman, P., Vos, J. G. M., Matisons, M., & Thrän, D. (2023) · Energy, Sustainability and Society · doi:10.1186/s13705-023-00416-1 · Cited by 9
“Under the bioeconomy strategy and against the risk of unsustainable biomass use for the natural ecosystem [7–9], the European Union prioritises the use of biomass from residual and waste materials [10].”
BackgroundHatvani, N., van den Oever, M. J. A., Mátéffy, K., & Koós, Á. (2022) · Bio-based and Applied Economics · doi:10.36253/bae-10820 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“13 Currently, many ongoing bioeconomy-related development activities are heavily dependent on grants and other subsidies, especially for SMEs, and they are quite far from reaching economic profitability, even if their bio-based technology is reported to be on high TRL and BRL. Generally, the income…”
InfluentialAssessment of the Concentration and Structure of the Bioeconomy: The Regional Approach
Muska, A., Popluga, D., & Pilvere, I. (2022) · Emerging Science Journal · doi:10.28991/esj-2023-07-01-05 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“The sustainability and qualitative growth of current production and consumption patterns may be improved through a change from a fossil-based throughput economy towards a bioeconomy with bio-based and recirculated products and renewable energy [4, 5].”
BackgroundRole of Bioeconomy in Circular Economy
Yadav, B., Atmakuri, A., Chavan, S., Tyagi, R. D., Drogui, P., & Pilli, S. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-821878-5.00022-2 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Circularity potential identification for new bio-materials using material flow analysis
Kruczek, M., Jąderko-Skubis, K., Markowska, M., Zgórska, A., & Białowąs, M. (2025) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179649 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Backhouse, M., & Lorenzen, K. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13084525 · Cited by 8
“However, studies already emphasized that bioeconomy strategies and policies do not automatically lead to more sustainability [8,9].”
Role of education in implementing the sustainable development strategy
Канафиевна, К. Р., Rudenko, A., & Motylev, R. V. (2021) · E3S Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202125007008 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
From static to dynamic: Reviewing the application and potential of dynamic LCA to bio-based systems
de Jong, M., Corona, B., Junginger, M., & Shen, L. (2026) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-026-02624-1 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Hoang, A. T., Chen, W.-H., Guerrero-Pérez, M., Rodríguez-Castellón, E., López-Escalante, M. C., Huynh, D. N. L., Nguyen, X.-P., Truong, T. H., & Pham, P. (2026) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2025.139831 · Cited by 7
Intensification of corn fiber saccharification using a tailor made enzymatic cocktail.
Manso, J. O., Nielsen, M., Moya, E. B., Sandri, J. P., Yamakawa, C. K., & Mussatto, S. I. (2023) · Enzyme and Microbial Technology · doi:10.1016/j.enzmictec.2023.110347 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Chemo-Sonic Pretreatment Approach on Marine Macroalgae for Energy Efficient Biohydrogen Production
Shankaran, S., Tamilarasan, K., & Jeyakumar, R. B. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su141912849 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“When specific requirements are met, the bioeconomy can advance toward sustainability: (i) the resource base is sustainable; (ii) processes and products are sustainable and (iii) transport of materials is viable [13].”
BackgroundO'Shea, R., Howe, C., & Collins, A. (2022) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4067062 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Tahvanainen, V., Laakkonen, A., Pesälä, O., Pittaluga, L., Hujala, T., & Pykäläinen, J. (2024) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103248 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Yuan, J., Chen, A., Chai, Y., Bai, M., Zhu, S., Peng, L., & Zhang, J.-C. (2024) · Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery · doi:10.1007/s13399-024-05649-4 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“This shift has prompted many nations to move away from traditional economic models towards a more integrated approach known as the BCG economy, which encompasses the bio-economy, circular economy, and green economy paradigms [1].”
Butt, T., Amjad, M., Raza, S. F., Riaz, F., Ahmad, S., & Abdollahian, M. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su151813604 · Cited by 6
Understanding the bioeconomy: a new sustainability economy in British and European public discourse
Sotiropoulou, I., & Deutz, P. (2022) · Bio-based and Applied Economics · doi:10.36253/bae-9534 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“In other cases, the sustainability of the bioeconomy is conflated with the renewability of resources, and those two are both thought to be interchangeable with the sustainability or renewability of capital (Gawel et al., 2019; Birch and Tyfield, 2013).”
InfluentialExperimentalist Governance in Bioeconomy: Insights from the Brazilian Amazon
Pinsky, V., Marcovitch, J., & Val, A. (2024) · Revista de Administração Contemporânea · doi:10.1590/1982-7849rac2024240170.en · Cited by 6
“It seeks sustainable ways of producing and consuming resources (Gawel et al., 2019), while respecting planetary boundaries (Rockström et al., 2023).”
Mbamalu, E. E., & Mohammed, I. Y. (2025) · Materials Circular Economy · doi:10.1007/s42824-025-00179-4 · Cited by 5
“With appropriate strategies and investments, the continent can build on its agricultural, forestry, and fisheries sectors to create a new economic model that is not only sustainable but also highly profitable (Gawel et al. 2019).”
Exploring Social Acceptance in the Bioeconomy: A Scoping Review and Future Research Directions
Sadeghzadeh, M., Henchion, M., & O'Neill, E. (2025) · Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy · doi:10.1016/j.clcb.2025.100157 · Cited by 5
Escobar, C. H. G., Torres, J. C. G., & Rodríguez, A. O. V. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su162310370 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Wurster, S., & Reis, C. F. D. B. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su141911951 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Positioning the biofuel policy in the bioeconomy of the BioEast macro-region
Kulišić, B., Dimitriou, I., & Mola-Yudego, B. (2021) · Biofuels · doi:10.1080/17597269.2021.1984165 · Cited by 5
“approach that allows policy learning [22,23].”
Silva, J. C. K., Soliani, R. D., Ferreira-Júnior, G. C., Lovrić, N., & Lobão, M. S. P. (2025) · Gestão & Produção · doi:10.1590/1806-9649-2025v32e14724 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
The impact of digital technology on sustainable agriculture and bioeconomy
Šermukšnytė-Alešiūnienė, K., & Ispiryan, A. (2026) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2026.1655881 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Gray, K., Edwards, H., Doan, A. G., Huso, W. D., Lee, J., Pan, W., Bolima, N., Morse, M. E., Yoda, S., Gautam, I., et al. (2024) · Fungal Biology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1186/s40694-024-00191-4 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Fully biobased materials have the potential to alleviate these pressures due to their 100% renewability and their ability to decompose naturally [1, 4, 5].”
Olivo, M. L. O., & Lakner, Z. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15065158 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gawel, E., Pannicke, N., & Hagemann, N.
- Affiliations
- Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Gawel, Erik
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2019-05-28
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3005
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2946868949
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 135
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 37.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Qucosa (Saxon State and University Library Dresden) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (031A078A)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Management
- Keywords
- bioeconomy, bioproducts, circular economy, welfare loss, fossil resource substitution, consumer acceptance, bioeconomy governance, climate change mitigation, sustainability conflicts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review