Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 433

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The challenge of establishing preclinical models for segmental bone defect research

Open access
Reichert, Johannes C., Saifzadeh, Siamak, Wullschleger, Martin E., Epari, Devakara R., Schütz, Michael A., Duda, Georg N., Schell, Hanna, van Griensven, Martijn, Redl, Heinz, Hutmacher, Dietmar W.·2009·Biomaterials

Abstract

A considerable number of international research groups as well as commercial entities work on the development of new bone grafting materials, carriers, growth factors and specifically tissue-engineered constructs for bone regeneration. They are strongly interested in evaluating their concepts in highly reproducible large segmental defects in preclinical and large animal models. To allow comparison between different studies and their outcomes, it is essential that animal models, fixation devices, surgical procedures and methods of taking measurements are well standardized to produce reliable data pools and act as a base for further directions to orthopaedic and tissue engineering developments, specifically translation into the clinic. In this leading opinion paper, we aim to review and critically discuss the different large animal bone defect models reported in the literature. We conclude that most publications provide only rudimentary information on how to establish relevant preclinical segmental bone defects in large animals. Hence, we express our opinion on methodologies to establish preclinical critically sized, segmental bone defect models used in past research with reference to surgical techniques, fixation methods and postoperative management focusing on tibial fracture and segmental defect models.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.050

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 433

Metadata

Authors
Reichert, J. C., Saifzadeh, S., Wullschleger, M. E., Epari, D. R., Schütz, M. A., Duda, G. N., Schell, H., van Griensven, M., Redl, H., & Hutmacher, D. W.
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-04
Volume
30
Issue
12
Pages
2149-2163
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995000205
Cited by
433
References
2
FWCI
13.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The challenge of establishing preclinical models for segmental bone defect research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.050
The paper
Reichert, J. C., Saifzadeh, S., Wullschleger, M. E., Epari, D. R., Schütz, M. A., Duda, G. N., Schell, H., van Griensven, M., Redl, H., & Hutmacher, D. W. (2009). The challenge of establishing preclinical models for segmental bone defect research. Biomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.050

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.