The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The challenge of establishing preclinical models for segmental bone defect research
Open accessAbstract
A considerable number of international research groups as well as commercial entities work on the development of new bone grafting materials, carriers, growth factors and specifically tissue-engineered constructs for bone regeneration. They are strongly interested in evaluating their concepts in highly reproducible large segmental defects in preclinical and large animal models. To allow comparison between different studies and their outcomes, it is essential that animal models, fixation devices, surgical procedures and methods of taking measurements are well standardized to produce reliable data pools and act as a base for further directions to orthopaedic and tissue engineering developments, specifically translation into the clinic. In this leading opinion paper, we aim to review and critically discuss the different large animal bone defect models reported in the literature. We conclude that most publications provide only rudimentary information on how to establish relevant preclinical segmental bone defects in large animals. Hence, we express our opinion on methodologies to establish preclinical critically sized, segmental bone defect models used in past research with reference to surgical techniques, fixation methods and postoperative management focusing on tibial fracture and segmental defect models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Animal models for implant biomaterial research in bone: A review
AO Research Institute, A. F., Pearce, A., Richards, R., Milz, S., Schneider, E., & Pearce, S. (2007) · European Cells and Materials · doi:10.22203/ecm.v013a01 · Cited by 1,289
Laurencin, C., Khan, Y., & El-Amin, S. F. (2006) · Expert Review of Medical Devices · doi:10.1586/17434440.3.1.49 · Cited by 716
Cited by
Ho-Shui-Ling, A., Bolander, J., Rustom, L. E., Johnson, A. W., Luyten, F. P., & Picart, C. (2018) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.07.017 · Cited by 961
Bone Regeneration Based on Tissue Engineering Conceptions — A 21st Century Perspective
Henkel, J., Woodruff, M. A., Epari, D. R., Steck, R., Glatt, V., Dickinson, I. C., Choong, P. F. M., Schuetz, M. A., & Hutmacher, D. W. (2013) · Bone Research · doi:10.4248/br201303002 · Cited by 907
Self-citationToward delivery of multiple growth factors in tissue engineering
Chen, F.-M., Zhang, M., & Wu, Z.-F. (2010) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.053 · Cited by 649
Bone tissue engineering therapeutics: controlled drug delivery in three-dimensional scaffolds
Mouriño, V., & Boccaccini, A. R. (2010) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2009.0379 · Cited by 527
A Tissue Engineering Solution for Segmental Defect Regeneration in Load-Bearing Long Bones
Reichert, J. C., Cipitria, A., Epari, D. R., Saifzadeh, S., Krishnakanth, P., Berner, A., Woodruff, M. A., Schell, H., Mehta, M., Schuetz, M. A., et al. (2012) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3003720 · Cited by 364
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Reichert, J. C., Saifzadeh, S., Wullschleger, M. E., Epari, D. R., Schütz, M. A., Duda, G. N., Schell, H., van Griensven, M., Redl, H., & Hutmacher, D. W.
- Venue
- Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2149-2163
- ISSN
- 0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1995000205
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The challenge of establishing preclinical models for segmental bone defect research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.050
- The paper
- Reichert, J. C., Saifzadeh, S., Wullschleger, M. E., Epari, D. R., Schütz, M. A., Duda, G. N., Schell, H., van Griensven, M., Redl, H., & Hutmacher, D. W. (2009). The challenge of establishing preclinical models for segmental bone defect research. Biomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.050
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.