Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 344

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The relationship between platelet adhesion on surfaces and the structure versus the amount of adsorbed fibrinogen

Open access
Sivaraman, Balakrishnan, Latour, Robert A.·2010·Biomaterials

Abstract

While platelet adhesion to biomaterial surfaces is widely recognized to be related to adsorbed fibrinogen (Fg), it has remained controversial whether platelet adhesion is in response to the adsorbed amount or the adsorbed conformation of this protein. To address this issue, we designed a series of platelet adhesion studies to clearly separate these two factors, thus enabling us to definitively determine whether it is the amount or the conformation of adsorbed Fg that mediates platelet response. Fg was adsorbed to a broad range of surface chemistries from a wide range of solution concentrations, with the amount and conformation of adsorbed Fg determined by absorbance and circular dichroism (CD) spectropolarimetry, respectively. Platelet adhesion response was determined by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Our results show that platelet adhesion is strongly correlated with the degree of adsorption-induced unfolding of Fg (r2 = 0.96) with essentially no correlation with the amount of Fg adsorbed (r2 = 0.04). Platelet receptor inhibitor studies using an RGDS peptide reduced platelet adhesion by only about 50%, and SEM results show that adherent platelets after RGDS blocking were much more rounded with minimal extended filopodia compared with the unblocked platelets. These results provide definitive proof that the conformation of adsorbed Fg is the critical determinant of platelet adhesion, not the amount of Fg adsorbed, with adsorption-induced unfolding potentially exposing two distinctly different types of platelet binding sites in Fg; one that induces platelet adhesion alone and one that induces both platelet adhesion and activation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.10.008

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 344

Metadata

Authors
Sivaraman, B., & Latour, R. A.
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
832-839
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983331713
Cited by
344
References
0
FWCI
7.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The relationship between platelet adhesion on surfaces and the structure versus the amount of adsorbed fibrinogen. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.10.008
The paper
Sivaraman, B., & Latour, R. A. (2010). The relationship between platelet adhesion on surfaces and the structure versus the amount of adsorbed fibrinogen. Biomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.10.008

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.