Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 271

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Perfusion-decellularized pancreas as a natural 3D scaffold for pancreatic tissue and whole organ engineering

Open access
Goh, Saik-Kia, Bertera, Suzanne, Olsen, Phillip, Candiello, Joseph E., Halfter, Willi, Uechi, Guy, Balasubramani, Manimalha, Johnson, Scott A., Sicari, Brian M., Kollar, Elizabeth, Badylak, Stephen F., Banerjee, Ipsita·2013·Biomaterials

Abstract

Approximately 285 million people worldwide suffer from diabetes, with insulin supplementation as the most common treatment measure. Regenerative medicine approaches such as a bioengineered pancreas has been proposed as potential therapeutic alternatives. A bioengineered pancreas will benefit from the development of a bioscaffold that supports and enhances cellular function and tissue development. Perfusion-decellularized organs are a likely candidate for use in such scaffolds since they mimic compositional, architectural and biomechanical nature of a native organ. In this study, we investigate perfusion-decellularization of whole pancreas and the feasibility to recellularize the whole pancreas scaffold with pancreatic cell types. Our result demonstrates that perfusion-decellularization of whole pancreas effectively removes cellular and nuclear material while retaining intricate three-dimensional microarchitecture with perfusable vasculature and ductal network and crucial extracellular matrix (ECM) components. To mimic pancreatic cell composition, we recellularized the whole pancreas scaffold with acinar and beta cell lines and cultured up to 5 days. Our result shows successful cellular engraftment within the decellularized pancreas, and the resulting graft gave rise to strong up-regulation of insulin gene expression. These findings support biological utility of whole pancreas ECM as a biomaterials scaffold for supporting and enhancing pancreatic cell functionality and represent a step toward bioengineered pancreas using regenerative medicine approaches.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.05.066

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 271

Metadata

Authors
Goh, S.-K., Bertera, S., Olsen, P., Candiello, J. E., Halfter, W., Uechi, G., Balasubramani, M., Johnson, S. A., Sicari, B. M., Kollar, E., Badylak, S. F., & Banerjee, I.
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
34
Issue
28
Pages
6760-6772
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079312215
Cited by
271
References
9
FWCI
17.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perfusion-decellularized pancreas as a natural 3D scaffold for pancreatic tissue and whole organ engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.05.066
The paper
Goh, S.-K., Bertera, S., Olsen, P., Candiello, J. E., Halfter, W., Uechi, G., Balasubramani, M., Johnson, S. A., Sicari, B. M., Kollar, E., Badylak, S. F., & Banerjee, I. (2013). Perfusion-decellularized pancreas as a natural 3D scaffold for pancreatic tissue and whole organ engineering. Biomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.05.066

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.