The DOI matches its Crossref record; 280 of the 280 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neural tissue engineering options for peripheral nerve regeneration
Abstract
Tissue engineered nerve grafts (TENGs) have emerged as a potential alternative to autologous nerve grafts, the gold standard for peripheral nerve repair. Typically, TENGs are composed of a biomaterial-based template that incorporates biochemical cues. A number of TENGs have been used experimentally to bridge long peripheral nerve gaps in various animal models, where the desired outcome is nerve tissue regeneration and functional recovery. So far, the translation of TENGs to the clinic for use in humans has met with a certain degree of success. In order to optimize the TENG design and further approach the matching of TENGs with autologous nerve grafts, many new cues, beyond the traditional ones, will have to be integrated into TENGs. Furthermore, there is a strong requirement for monitoring the real-time dynamic information related to the construction of TENGs. The aim of this opinion paper is to specifically and critically describe the latest advances in the field of neural tissue engineering for peripheral nerve regeneration. Here we delineate new attempts in the design of template (or scaffold) materials, especially in the context of biocompatibility, the choice and handling of support cells, and growth factor release systems. We further discuss the significance of RNAi for peripheral nerve regeneration, anticipate the potential application of RNAi reagents for TENGs, and speculate on the possible contributions of additional elements, including angiogenesis, electrical stimulation, molecular inflammatory mediators, bioactive peptides, antioxidant reagents, and cultured biological constructs, to TENGs. Finally, we consider that a diverse array of physicochemical and biological cues must be orchestrated within a TENG to create a self-consistent coordinated system with a close proximity to the regenerative microenvironment of the peripheral nervous system.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“First, the degradation rate of PLCL must be carefully matched to the regeneration rate of peripheral nerves. Excessively rapid degradation will lead to the loss of mechanical support of scaffolds, and the acidic products generated by the degradation of PLCL will also adversely affect nerve growth. Too long degradation time may also interfere with the growth of new nerve tissue [179].”
From Application of PLCL as a biodegradable polymer in biomedical engineering (2026) · cites this paper as [179]
In the citing paper
“For peripheral nerve regeneration, these scaffolds must first provide a suitable external environment for nerve fiber growth, using biomaterials to bridge the gap between interrupted nerve fibers. They should also possess sufficient mechanical strength to protect the damaged nerve tissue from secondary compression and invasion by surrounding tissues [179].”
From Application of PLCL as a biodegradable polymer in biomedical engineering (2026) · cites this paper as [179]
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Cheng, F., Tai, M., Sheu, M., Chen, C., Yang, D., Su, H., Ho, S.-P., Lai, S.-Z., & Pan, H.-C. (2009) · Journal of neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/2009.8.jns09850 · Cited by 70
RetractedMicroRNAs: Target Recognition and Regulatory Functions
Bartel, D. P. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.002 · Cited by 20,068
Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans
Fire, A., Xu, S., Montgomery, M. K., Kostas, S. A., Driver, S. E., & Mello, C. C. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35888 · Cited by 15,429
Most mammalian mRNAs are conserved targets of microRNAs
Friedman, R. C., Farh, K. K.-H., Burge, C. B., & Bartel, D. P. (2009) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.082701.108 · Cited by 8,462
Knocking down barriers: advances in siRNA delivery
Whitehead, K. A., Langer, R., & Anderson, D. G. (2009) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2742 · Cited by 3,115
On the mechanisms of biocompatibility
Williams, D. F. (2008) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.04.023 · Cited by 2,772
Self-citationLong noncoding RNAs: functional surprises from the RNA worldPreprint
Wilusz, J. E., Sunwoo, H., & Spector, D. L. (2009) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1800909 · Cited by 2,322
Bone Marrow Stromal Stem Cells: Nature, Biology, and Potential Applications
Bianco, P., Riminucci, M., Gronthos, S., & Robey, P. G. (2001) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1634/stemcells.19-3-180 · Cited by 1,944
Long noncoding RNAs and human disease
Wapinski, O. L., & Chang, H. Y. (2011) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2011.04.001 · Cited by 1,925
Phinney, D. G., & Prockop, D. J. (2007) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1634/stemcells.2007-0637 · Cited by 1,910
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Electrospinning and Electrospun Nanofibers: Methods, Materials, and Applications
Xue, J., Wu, T. S., Dai, Y., & Younan Xia, A. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00593 · Cited by 5,174
Advancing biomaterials of human origin for tissue engineering
Chen, F.-M., & Liu, X. (2016) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.02.004 · Cited by 1,158
Supramolecular Adhesive Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering Applications
Zhao, Y., Song, S., Ren, X., Zhang, J., Lin, Q., & Zhao, Y. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00815 · Cited by 714
Peripheral nerve regeneration: Experimental strategies and future perspectives
Faroni, A., Mobasseri, S. A., Kingham, P. J., & Reid, A. J. (2014) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2014.11.010 · Cited by 592
3D Bioprinting for Organ Regeneration
Cui, H., Nowicki, M. A., Fisher, J. P., & Zhang, L. G. (2016) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201601118 · Cited by 552
Metadata
- Authors
- Gu, X., Ding, F., & Williams, D. F.
- Affiliations
- Nantong University (CN)
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
- Venue
- Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-08
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 6143-6156
- ISSN
- 0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1985525878
- Cited by
- 630
- References
- 280
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 9
- FWCI
- 4.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Key Basic Research Program of China (2014CB542202)
- Hi-Tech Research and Development Program of China (2012AA020502)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (81130080, 81171180)
- Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Keywords
- peripheral nerve regeneration, tissue-engineered nerve grafts, neural scaffolds, biocompatibility, supporting cells, growth factor release, RNA interference, angiogenesis, electrical stimulation, inflammatory mediators, bioactive peptides, autologous nerve graft, functional recovery
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Humans, Nerve Regeneration, Peripheral Nerves, Tissue Engineering, RNA Interference, Tissue Scaffolds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
