The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In vivo bioresponses to silk proteins
Open accessAbstract
Silks are appealing materials for numerous biomedical applications involving drug delivery, tissue engineering, or implantable devices, because of their tunable mechanical properties and wide range of physical structures. In addition to the functionalities needed for specific clinical applications, a key factor necessary for clinical success for any implanted material is appropriate interactions with the body in vivo. This review summarizes our current understanding of the in vivo biological responses to silks, including degradation, the immune and inflammatory response, and tissue remodeling with particular attention to vascularization. While we focus in this review on silkworm silk fibroin protein due to the large quantity of in vivo data thanks to its widespread use in medical materials and consumer products, spider silk information is also included if available. Silk proteins are degraded in the body on a time course that is dependent on the method of silk fabrication and can range from hours to years. Silk protein typically induces a mild inflammatory response that decreases within a few weeks of implantation. The response involves recruitment and activation of macrophages and may include activation of a mild foreign body response with the formation of multinuclear giant cells, depending on the material format and location of implantation. The number of immune cells present decreases with time and granulation tissue, if formed, is replaced by endogenous, not fibrous, tissue. Importantly, silk materials have not been demonstrated to induce mineralization, except when used in calcified tissues. Due to its ability to be degraded, silk can be remodeled in the body allowing for vascularization and tissue ingrowth with eventual complete replacement by native tissue. The degree of remodeling, tissue ingrowth, or other specific cell behaviors can be modulated with addition of growth or other signaling factors. Silk can also be combined with numerous other materials including proteins, synthetic polymers, and ceramics to enhance its characteristics for a particular function. Overall, the diverse array of silk materials shows excellent bioresponses in vivo with low immunogenicity and the ability to be remodeled and replaced by native tissue making it suitable for numerous clinical applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Foreign body reaction to biomaterials
Anderson, J. M., Rodriguez, A., & Chang, D. T. (2008) · Seminars in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004 · Cited by 5,138 · cited 6×
“This can lead to the formation of granulation tissue comprised of macrophages, fibroblasts, and new vasculature and is the precursor towards a fibrotic capsule [43].”
InfluentialAltman, G. H., Diaz, F., Jakuba, C., Calabro, T., Horan, R. L., Chen, J., Lu, H., Richmond, J., & Kaplan, D. L. (2003) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00353-8 · Cited by 3,458
Self-citationMaterials fabrication from Bombyx mori silk fibroin
Rockwood, D. N., Preda, R. C., Yücel, T., Wang, X., Lovett, M. L., & Kaplan, D. L. (2011) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2011.379 · Cited by 3,066
Self-citationMacrophage plasticity and polarization in tissue repair and remodelling
Mantovani, A., Biswas, S. K., Galdiero, M. R., Sica, A., & Locati, M. (2013) · The Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1002/path.4133 · Cited by 2,384 · cited 1×
“Activation of lower levels of inflammation increase remodeling by inducing vascularization and the release of proteins involved in tissue remodeling and can therefore be beneficial to incorporating and degrading implanted biomaterials as new tissue forms [45].”
Murphy, K., & Weaver, C. (2016) · W.W. Norton eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315533247 · Cited by 2,258
Biomedical applications of collagen
Lee, C. H., Singla, A., & Lee, Y. (2001) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/s0378-5173(01)00691-3 · Cited by 1,945
Athanasiou, K. A., Niederauer, G. G., & Agrawal, C. M. (1996) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/0142-9612(96)85754-1 · Cited by 1,497
Biological Responses to Materials
Anderson, J. M. (2001) · Annual Review of Materials Research · doi:10.1146/annurev.matsci.31.1.81 · Cited by 1,465
New Opportunities for an Ancient Material
Omenetto, F. G., & Kaplan, D. L. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1188936 · Cited by 1,457
Self-citationElectrospun silk-BMP-2 scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
Li, C., Vepari, C., Jin, H.-J., Kim, H. J., & Kaplan, D. L. (2006) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.022 · Cited by 1,140
Self-citation
Cited by
The Biomedical Use of Silk: Past, Present, Future
Holland, C., Numata, K., Rnjak‐Kovacina, J., & Seib, F. P. (2019) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201800465 · Cited by 815
Hydrogel scaffolds for tissue engineering: the importance of polymer choice
Spicer, C. D. (2020) · Polymer Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c9py01021a · Cited by 527
Silk biomaterials in wound healing and skin regeneration therapeutics: From bench to bedside
Chouhan, D., & Mandal, B. B. (2020) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.11.050 · Cited by 348
Chemical, thermal, time, and enzymatic stability of silk materials with silk I structure
Zhao, M., Qi, Z., Tao, X., Newkirk, C., Hu, X., & Lu, S. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22084136 · Cited by 130
Crosslinking strategies for silk fibroin hydrogels: promising biomedical materials
Farokhi, M., Aleemardani, M., Solouk, A., Mirzadeh, H., Teuschl, A. H., & Redl, H. (2021) · Biomedical Materials · doi:10.1088/1748-605x/abb615 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Thurber, A. E., Omenetto, F. G., & Kaplan, D. L.
- Venue
- Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 71
- Pages
- 145-157
- ISSN
- 0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1174494744
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 86
- FWCI
- 11.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vivo bioresponses to silk proteins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.039
- The paper
- Thurber, A. E., Omenetto, F. G., & Kaplan, D. L. (2015). In vivo bioresponses to silk proteins. Biomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.039
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.