Cited by 316Nanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryRNA Interference and Gene DeliveryGold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Impact of protein pre-coating on the protein corona composition and nanoparticle cellular uptake

Abstract

Nanoparticles (NPs) are functionalized with targeting ligands to enable selectively delivering drugs to desired locations in the body. When these functionalized NPs enter the blood stream, plasma proteins bind to their surfaces, forming a protein corona that affects NP uptake and targeting efficiency. To address this problem, new strategies for directing the formation of a protein corona that has targeting capabilities are emerging. Here, we have investigated the feasibility of directing corona composition to promote targeted NP uptake by specific types of cells. We used the well-characterized process of opsonin-induced phagocytosis by macrophages as a simplified model of corona-mediated NP uptake by a desired cell type. We demonstrate that pre-coating silica NPs with gamma-globulins (γ-globulins) produced a protein corona that was enriched with opsonins, such as immunoglobulins. Although immunoglobulins are ligands that bind to receptors on macrophages and elicit phagocytois, the opsonin-rich protein corona did not increase NP uptake by macrophage RAW 264.7 cells. Immunolabeling experiments indicated that the binding of opsonins to their target cell surface receptors was impeded by other proteins in the corona. Thus, corona-mediated NP targeting strategies must optimize both the recruitment of the desired plasma proteins as well as their accessibility and orientation in the corona layer.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.019

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These strategies are still limited at conferring targeting specificity because an additional targeting ligand increases the propensity for protein corona formation to mask targeting ability and inhibit the biological effects of nanoparticles.

    “these strategies are still limited at conferring targeting specificity since an additional targeting ligand increases the propensity for protein corona formation to mask the targeting ability and inhibit the biological effects of nanoparticles18–24.”
  • Covalent attachment of counterparts on particles significantly changes their conformations and particle surface properties, inducing potential detrimental interactions with external biomolecules rather than stabilizing them.

    “covalent attachment of their counterparts on particles significantly changes their conformations and particle surface properties (e.g., hydrophobicity and charge density), inducing potential detrimental interactions with external biomolecules, rather than stabilizing them13,19,37.”
  • The orientation of functional plasma proteins in the corona layer is random and their accessibility to receptor-binding pocket is impaired.

    “One possible reason is that the orientation of functional plasma proteins in the corona layer is random and their accessibility to receptor-binding pocket is impaired22,23.”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Peer, 2007, Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2, 751, 10.1038/nnano.2007.387 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Mahmoudi, 2011, Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs): development, surface modification and applications in chemotherapy, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 63, 24, 10.1016/j.addr.2010.05.006 · DOI
  3. Farokhzad, 2006, Targeted nanoparticle-aptamer bioconjugates for cancer chemotherapy in vivo, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 103, 6315, 10.1073/pnas.0601755103 · DOI
  4. Gao, 2004, In vivo cancer targeting and imaging with semiconductor quantum dots, Nat. Biotechnol., 22, 969, 10.1038/nbt994 · DOI
  5. Mahon, 2012, Designing the nanoparticle–biomolecule interface for “targeting and therapeutic delivery”, J. Control. Release, 161, 164, 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.04.009 · DOI
  6. Walczyk, 2010, What the cell “Sees” in bionanoscience, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 132, 5761, 10.1021/ja910675v · DOI
  7. Mahmoudi, 2011, Protein−nanoparticle interactions: opportunities and challenges, Chem. Rev., 111, 5610, 10.1021/cr100440g · DOI
  8. Nagayama, 2007, Time-dependent changes in opsonin amount associated on nanoparticles alter their hepatic uptake characteristics, Int. J. Pharm., 342, 215, 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2007.04.036 · DOI
  9. Furumoto, 2002, Important role of serum proteins associated on the surface of particles in their hepatic disposition, J. Control. Release, 83, 89, 10.1016/S0168-3659(02)00196-7 · DOI
  10. Aggarwal, 2009, Nanoparticle interaction with plasma proteins as it relates to particle biodistribution, biocompatibility and therapeutic efficacy, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 61, 428, 10.1016/j.addr.2009.03.009 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Lesniak, 2012, Effects of the presence or absence of a protein corona on silica nanoparticle uptake and impact on cells, ACS Nano, 6, 5845, 10.1021/nn300223w · DOI
  12. Zhu, 2009, Effects of serum proteins on intracellular uptake and cytotoxicity of carbon nanoparticles, Carbon, 47, 1351, 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.01.026 · DOI
  13. Zhu, 2012, The interplay of monolayer structure and serum protein interactions on the cellular uptake of gold nanoparticles, Small, 8, 2659, 10.1002/smll.201200794 · DOI
  14. Lesniak, 2013, Nanoparticle adhesion to the cell membrane and its effect on nanoparticle uptake efficiency, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 135, 1438, 10.1021/ja309812z · DOI
  15. Fleischer, 2014, Secondary structure of corona proteins determines the cell surface receptors used by nanoparticles, J. Phys. Chem. B, 118, 14017, 10.1021/jp502624n · DOI
  16. Qiu, 2010, Surface chemistry and aspect ratio mediated cellular uptake of Au nanorods, Biomaterials, 31, 7606, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.06.051 · DOI
  17. Cifuentes-Rius, 2013, Optimizing the properties of the protein corona surrounding nanoparticles for tuning payload release, ACS Nano, 7, 10066, 10.1021/nn404166q · DOI
  18. Mirshafiee, 2013, Protein corona significantly reduces active targeting yield, Chem. Commun., 49, 2557, 10.1039/c3cc37307j · DOI
  19. Salvati, 2013, Transferrin-functionalized nanoparticles lose their targeting capabilities when a biomolecule corona adsorbs on the surface, Nat. Nanotechnol., 8, 137, 10.1038/nnano.2012.237 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Sobczynski, 2014, Plasma protein corona modulates the vascular wall interaction of drug carriers in a material and donor specific manner, PLoS One, 9, e107408, 10.1371/journal.pone.0107408 · DOI
  21. Gref, 2000, ‘Stealth’ corona-core nanoparticles surface modified by polyethylene glycol (PEG): influences of the corona (PEG chain length and surface density) and of the core composition on phagocytic uptake and plasma protein adsorption, Colloids Surf. B. Biointerfaces, 18, 301, 10.1016/S0927-7765(99)00156-3 · DOI
  22. Pozzi, 2014, Effect of polyethyleneglycol (PEG) chain length on the bio-nano-interactions between PEGylated lipid nanoparticles and biological fluids: from nanostructure to uptake in cancer cells, Nanoscale, 6, 2782, 10.1039/c3nr05559k · DOI · Paper page
  23. Caracciolo, 2015, Liposome–protein corona in a physiological environment: challenges and opportunities for targeted delivery of nanomedicines, Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med., 11, 543, 10.1016/j.nano.2014.11.003 · DOI
  24. Kreuter, 2002, Apolipoprotein-mediated transport of nanoparticle-bound drugs across the blood-brain barrier, J. Drug Target., 10, 317, 10.1080/10611860290031877 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Zhang, 2015, Corona-directed nucleic acid delivery into hepatic stellate cells for liver fibrosis therapy, ACS Nano, 9, 2405, 10.1021/nn505166x · DOI
  26. Caracciolo, 2013, Selective targeting capability acquired with a protein corona adsorbed on the surface of 1,2-dioleoyl-3-trimethylammonium propane/DNA nanoparticles, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 5, 13171, 10.1021/am404171h · DOI
  27. Steinberg, 2009, Analysis of macrophage phagocytosis: quantitative assays of phagosome formation and maturation using high-throughput fluorescence microscopy, Methods Mol. Biol., 531, 45, 10.1007/978-1-59745-396-7_4 · DOI
  28. Sobota, 2005, Binding of IgG-opsonized particles to FcγR Is an active stage of phagocytosis that involves receptor clustering and phosphorylation, J. Immunol., 175, 4450, 10.4049/jimmunol.175.7.4450 · DOI
  29. Takasaki, 1984, Variants deficient in phagocytosis of latex beads isolated from the murine macrophagelike cell line J774, J. Cell Biol., 98, 2198, 10.1083/jcb.98.6.2198 · DOI
  30. Cannon, 1992, The macrophage capacity for phagocytosis, J. Cell Sci., 101, 907, 10.1242/jcs.101.4.907 · DOI
  31. Moyano, 2012, Nanoparticle hydrophobicity dictates immune response, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 134, 3965, 10.1021/ja2108905 · DOI
  32. Brown, 1991, Complement receptors and phagocytosis, Curr. Opin. Immunol., 3, 76, 10.1016/0952-7915(91)90081-B · DOI
  33. Cabec, 2002, Complement receptor 3 (CD11b/CD18) mediates type I and type II phagocytosis during nonopsonic and opsonic phagocytosis, respectively, J. Immunol., 169, 2003, 10.4049/jimmunol.169.4.2003 · DOI
  34. Daëron, 1997, Fc receptor biology, Annu. Rev. Immunol., 15, 203, 10.1146/annurev.immunol.15.1.203 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Swanson, 2004, The coordination of signaling during Fc receptor-mediated phagocytosis, J. Leukoc. Biol., 76, 1093, 10.1189/jlb.0804439 · DOI
  36. Potter, 1961, The opsonization of bentonite particles by γ-globulin, J. Immunol., 87, 110, 10.4049/jimmunol.87.1.110 · DOI
  37. Ogawara, 2004, Pre-coating with serum albumin reduces receptor-mediated hepatic disposition of polystyrene nanosphere: implications for rational design of nanoparticles, J. Control. Release, 100, 451, 10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.07.028 · DOI
  38. Furumoto, 2007, Effect of coupling of albumin onto surface of PEG liposome on its in vivo disposition, Int. J. Pharm., 329, 110, 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.08.026 · DOI
  39. Ogawara, 1999, Mechanisms of hepatic disposition of polystyrene microspheres in rats: effects of serum depend on the sizes of microspheres, J. Control. Release, 61, 241, 10.1016/S0168-3659(99)00121-2 · DOI
  40. Wang, 2007, Fluorescent nanoparticles for multiplexed bacteria monitoring, Bioconjug. Chem., 18, 297, 10.1021/bc060255n · DOI
  41. Tang, 2012, Synthesis and biological response of size-specific, monodisperse drug–silica nanoconjugates, ACS Nano., 6, 3954, 10.1021/nn300149c · DOI
  42. Shapero, 2011, Time and space resolved uptake study of silica nanoparticles by human cells, Mol. Biosyst., 7, 371, 10.1039/C0MB00109K · DOI
  43. Ishihama, 2005, Exponentially modified protein abundance index (emPAI) for estimation of absolute protein amount in proteomics by the number of sequenced peptides per protein, Mol. Cell Proteomics, 4, 1265, 10.1074/mcp.M500061-MCP200 · DOI · Paper page
  44. van Kessel, 2014, Neutrophil-mediated phagocytosis of Staphylococcus aureus, Front. Immunol., 5, 467, 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00467 · DOI
  45. Pacheco, 2013, Effects of microparticle size and Fc density on macrophage phagocytosis, PLoS One, 8, e60989, 10.1371/journal.pone.0060989 · DOI
  46. Raschke, 1978, Functional macrophage cell lines transformed by abelson leukemia virus, Cell, 15, 261, 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90101-0 · DOI
  47. Leroux, 1995, An investigation on the role of plasma and serum opsonins on the internalization of biodegradable poly(D,L-lactic acid) nanoparticles by human monocytes, Life Sci., 57, 695, 10.1016/0024-3205(95)00321-V · DOI
  48. Rytel, 1963, The opsonic effect of complement on the phagocytosis of γ-globulin-coated bentonite particles, J. Immunol., 90, 607, 10.4049/jimmunol.90.4.607 · DOI
  49. Deng, 2011, Nanoparticle-induced unfolding of fibrinogen promotes Mac-1 receptor activation and inflammation, Nat. Nanotechnol., 6, 39, 10.1038/nnano.2010.250 · DOI
  50. Walkey, 2014, Protein corona fingerprinting predicts the cellular interaction of gold and silver nanoparticles, ACS Nano, 8, 2439, 10.1021/nn406018q · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mirshafiee, V., Kim, R., Park, S., Mahmoudi, M., & Kraft, M. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
  • Mahmoudi, Morteza
  • Kraft, Mary L.
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
75
Pages
295-304
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2177773825
Cited by
316
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 20
FWCI
10.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • 3M Corporate Fellowship
  • Drickamer Graduate Research Fellowship
  • University of Illinois
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications
Keywords
protein corona, opsonization, opsonins, immunoglobulins, macrophage phagocytosis, silica nanoparticles, plasma protein binding, RAW 264.7 macrophages
MeSH terms
Protein Corona, RAW 264.7 Cells, Animals, Chromatography, Liquid, Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel, Endocytosis, Flow Cytometry, gamma-Globulins, Humans, Particle Size, Receptors, Fc, Serum Albumin, Microscopy, Confocal, Mice, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Nanoparticles, Static Electricity, Hydrodynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review