The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Three dimensional electrospun PCL/PLA blend nanofibrous scaffolds with significantly improved stem cells osteogenic differentiation and cranial bone formation
Open accessAbstract
Nanofibrous scaffolds that are morphologically/structurally similar to natural ECM are highly interested for tissue engineering; however, the electrospinning technique has the difficulty in directly producing clinically relevant 3D nanofibrous scaffolds with desired structural properties. To address this challenge, we have developed an innovative technique of thermally induced nanofiber self-agglomeration (TISA) recently. The aim of this work was to prepare (via the TISA technique) and evaluate 3D electrospun PCL/PLA blend (mass ratio: 4/1) nanofibrous scaffolds having high porosity of ~95.8% as well as interconnected and hierarchically structured pores with sizes from sub-micrometers to ~300 µm for bone tissue engineering. The hypothesis was that the incorporation of PLA (with higher mechanical stiffness/modulus and bioactivity) into PCL nanofibers would significantly improve human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) osteogenic differentiation in vitro and bone formation in vivo. Compared to neat PCL-3D scaffolds, PCL/PLA-3D blend scaffolds had higher mechanical properties and in vitro bioactivity; as a result, they not only enhanced the cell viability of hMSCs but also promoted the osteogenic differentiation. Furthermore, our in vivo studies revealed that PCL/PLA-3D scaffolds considerably facilitated new bone formation in a critical-sized cranial bone defect mouse model. In summary, both in vitro and in vivo results indicated that novel 3D electrospun PCL/PLA blend nanofibrous scaffolds would be strongly favorable/desired for hMSCs osteogenic differentiation and cranial bone formation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity?
Kokubo, T., & Takadama, H. (2006) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017 · Cited by 9,576
Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis
Karageorgiou, V., & Kaplan, D. (2005) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 · Cited by 6,622
Electrospinning: A fascinating fiber fabrication technique
Bhardwaj, N., & Kundu, S. C. (2010) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.01.004 · Cited by 5,028
Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
Rezwan, K., Chen, Q. Z., Blaker, J. J., & Boccaccini, A. R. (2006) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.039 · Cited by 3,839
Synthetic biodegradable polymers as orthopedic devices
Middleton, J. C., & Tipton, A. J. (2000) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00101-0 · Cited by 2,741
Three-Dimensional Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications: Role of Porosity and Pore Size
Loh, Q. L., & Choong, C. (2013) · Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews · doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2012.0437 · Cited by 2,668
Electrospun nanofibrous structure: A novel scaffold for tissue engineering
Li, W., Laurencin, C. T., Caterson, E. J., Tuan, R. S., & Ko, F. K. (2002) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research · doi:10.1002/jbm.10167 · Cited by 2,427
Recent advances in bone tissue engineering scaffolds
Bose, S., Roy, M., & Bandyopadhyay, A. (2012) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.07.005 · Cited by 2,206
Polymeric Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering Application: A Review
Dhandayuthapani, B., Yoshida, Y., Maekawa, T., & Kumar, D. S. (2011) · International Journal of Polymer Science · doi:10.1155/2011/290602 · Cited by 1,773
Bioactive glass ceramics: properties and applications
Kokubo, T. (1991) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/0142-9612(91)90194-f · Cited by 1,202
Cited by
Recent advances in biomaterials for 3D scaffolds: A review
Nikolova, M. P., & Chavali, M. S. (2019) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.10.005 · Cited by 907
Electrospun nanofiber reinforced composites: a review
Jiang, S., Chen, Y., Duan, G., Mei, C., Greiner, A., & Agarwal, S. (2018) · Polymer Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c8py00378e · Cited by 560
Amani, H., Arzaghi, H., Bayandori, M., Dezfuli, A. S., Pazoki‐Toroudi, H., Shafiee, A., & Moradi, L. (2019) · Advanced Materials Interfaces · doi:10.1002/admi.201900572 · Cited by 436
Natural and Synthetic Polymers for Bone Scaffolds Optimization
Donnaloja, F., Jacchetti, E., Soncini, M., & Raimondi, M. T. (2020) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym12040905 · Cited by 324
Electrospun polymer micro/nanofibers as pharmaceutical repositories for healthcare
Feng, X., Li, J., Zhang, X., Liu, T., Ding, J., & Chen, X. (2019) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.03.020 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Yao, Q., Cosme, J. G. L., Xu, T., Miszuk, J. M., Picciani, P. H. S., Fong, H., & Sun, H.
- Venue
- Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 115
- Pages
- 115-127
- ISSN
- 0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2549169970
- Cited by
- 543
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 24.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three dimensional electrospun PCL/PLA blend nanofibrous scaffolds with significantly improved stem cells osteogenic differentiation and cranial bone formation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.11.018
- The paper
- Yao, Q., Cosme, J. G. L., Xu, T., Miszuk, J. M., Picciani, P. H. S., Fong, H., & Sun, H. (2017). Three dimensional electrospun PCL/PLA blend nanofibrous scaffolds with significantly improved stem cells osteogenic differentiation and cranial bone formation. Biomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.11.018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.