Cited by 45Algal biology and biofuel productionEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityBioenergy crop production and management

Growing Algae for Biodiesel on Direct Sunlight or Sugars: A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment

Orfield, Nolan D., Levine, Robert B., Keoleian, Gregory A., Miller, Shelie A., Savage, Phillip E.·2015·ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

Abstract

Growing heterotrophic algae in reactors with sugar as the energy and carbon source rather than sunlight and carbon dioxide is an approach being commercialized today. However, the full environmental impacts of this fuel pathway have not been explored. The objective of this analysis was to compare the life cycle impacts of algal biodiesel produced heterotrophically to a phototrophic pathway featuring algae grown in ponds. A third, hybrid approach utilizing algae capable of both phototrophy and heterotrophy was also explored. Sugar beet and sugarcane were examined as feedstocks for the heterotrophic process. The results indicate that a reduction in the global warming potential (GWP) and an improvement in the net energy ratio (NER) for algal biodiesel could be possible for the heterotrophic and hybrid pathways relative to the phototrophic, but only if reactor cultivation can be performed efficiently and with sugarcane as the feedstock. For example, the NER varies from 0.6 to 1.6 for the heterotrophic pathway, depending on reactor performance, compared to 1.3 for the phototrophic pathway. Sugar crops used as feedstocks for heterotrophic cultivation present concerns about land constraints that are less of an issue for the phototrophic pathway. No pathway presented a clear advantage for the water stress impact metric.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/sc5004117

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Orfield, N. D., Levine, R. B., Keoleian, G. A., Miller, S. A., & Savage, P. E.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Orfield, Nolan D.
Venue
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
Published
2015-02-06
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
386-395
ISSN
2168-0485 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2328177193
Cited by
45
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0937992)
  • Division of Emerging Frontiers in Research and Innovation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
Keywords
algal biodiesel, sugar feedstocks, sugarcane, sugar beet, global warming potential, net energy ratio, land use restrictions, water stress, life cycle assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review