Cited by 331Molecular Biology Techniques and ApplicationsGene expression and cancer classificationSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of agonal and postmortem factors on gene expression profile: quality control in microarray analyses of postmortem human brain

Open access

Abstract

There are major concerns that specific agonal conditions, including coma and hypoxia, might affect ribonucleic acid (RNA) integrity in postmortem brain studies. We report that agonal factors significantly affect RNA integrity and have a major impact on gene expression profiles in microarrays. In contrast to agonal factors, gender, age, and postmortem factors have less effect on gene expression profiles. The Average Correlation Index is proposed as a method for evaluating RNA integrity on the basis of similarity of microarray profiles. Reducing the variance due to agonal factors is critical in investigating small but validated gene expression differences in messenger RNA levels between psychiatric patients and control subjects.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2003.10.013

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 331

Metadata

Authors
Tomita, H., Vawter, M. P., Walsh, D. M., Evans, S. J., Choudary, P. V., Li, J., Overman, K. M., Atz, M. E., Myers, R. M., Jones, E. G., Watson, S. J., Akil, H., & Bunney, W. E.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Bunney, William E
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-02
Volume
55
Issue
4
Pages
346-352
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2134441514
Cited by
331
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 16
FWCI
9.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH60398, R01MH054844, MH54844, MH 42251, P50MH060398, P01MH042251)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Keywords
postmortem brain, gene expression profiles, RNA integrity, microarray quality control, hypoxia, coma, postmortem interval, psychiatric patients
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Autopsy, Brain Chemistry, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Postmortem Changes, Quality Control, RNA, Statistics as Topic, Time Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Gene Expression, Case-Control Studies, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review