Cited by 230Molecular Biology Techniques and ApplicationsGene expression and cancer classificationSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics

Quality control parameters on a large dataset of regionally dissected human control brains for whole genome expression studies

Open access
Trabzuni, Daniah, Ryten, Mina, Walker, Robert, Smith, Colin, Imran, Sabaena, Ramasamy, Adaikalavan, Weale, Michael E., Hardy, John·2011·Journal of Neurochemistry

Abstract

We are building an open-access database of regional human brain expression designed to allow the genome-wide assessment of genetic variability on expression. Array and RNA sequencing technologies make assessment of genome-wide expression possible. Human brain tissue is a challenging source for this work because it can only be obtained several and variable hours post-mortem and after varying agonal states. These variables alter RNA integrity in a complex manner. In this report, we assess the effect of post-mortem delay, agonal state and age on gene expression, and the utility of pH and RNA integrity number as predictors of gene expression as measured on 1266 Affymetrix Exon Arrays. We assessed the accuracy of the array data using QuantiGene, as an independent non-PCR-based method. These quality control parameters will allow database users to assess data accuracy. We report that within the parameters of this study post-mortem delay, agonal state and age have little impact on array quality, array data are robust to variable RNA integrity, and brain pH has only a small effect on array performance. QuantiGene gave very similar expression profiles as array data. This study is the first step in our initiative to make human, regional brain expression freely available.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07432.x

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Expression profiling during human brain aging is challenging because postmortem tissue can take hours to days to stabilize.

    “Expression profiling during human brain aging is particularly challenging since it can take hours to days before postmortem tissue is stabilized (Melé et al., 2015; Soreq et al., 2017; Trabzuni et al., 2011).”

    From Atlas of the aging mouse brain reveals white matter as vulnerable foci (2023) · cites this paper as Trabzuni et al., 2011

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trabzuni, D., Ryten, M., Walker, R., Smith, C., Imran, S., Ramasamy, A., Weale, M. E., & Hardy, J.
Affiliations
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • Guy's Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Hardy, John
Venue
Journal of Neurochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-09-20
Volume
119
Issue
2
Pages
275-282
ISSN
  • 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-4159
OpenAlex
W2066399252
Cited by
229
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (089698)
  • King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre
  • Medical Research Council (MC_G1000735)
  • Army Research Office
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Keywords
postmortem delay, agonal state, brain age, RNA integrity number, brain pH
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aging, Brain Chemistry, Cause of Death, Exons, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Male, Middle Aged, Quality Control, RNA, Sex Characteristics, Tissue Banks, United States, Reproducibility of Results, DNA, Complementary, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling, Databases, Genetic, Microarray Analysis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review