Cited by 342Molecular Biology Techniques and ApplicationsRNA Research and SplicingSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics

The relative importance of premortem acidosis and postmortem interval for human brain gene expression studies: selective mRNA vulnerability and comparison with their encoded proteins

Harrison, P.J., Heath, P.R., Eastwood, S.L., Burnet, P.W.J., McDonald, B., Pearson, R.C.A.·1995·Neuroscience Letters

Abstract

To help account for the variable quality and quantity of RNA in human brain, we have studied the effect of premortem (agonal state) and postmortem factors on the detection of poly(A)+mRNA and eight mRNAs. For comparison, the influence of the same factors upon gene products encoded by the mRNAs was studied immunocytochemically or by receptor autoradiography. Brain pH declined with increasing age at death and was related to agonal state severity, but was independent of postmortem interval and the histological presence of hypoxic changes. By linear regression, pH was significantly associated with the abundance of several of the RNAs, but not with poly(A)+mRNA, immunoreactivities, or binding site densities. Postmortem interval had a limited influence upon mRNA and protein products. Freezer storage time showed no effect. Parallel rat brain studies showed no relationship between postmortem interval (0-48 h) and amounts of total RNA, poly(A)+RNA, or two individual mRNAs; however, RNA content was reduced by 40% at 96 h after death. pH is superior to clinical assessments of agonal state or mode of death in predicting mRNA preservation. It provides a simple means to improve human brain gene expression studies. pH is stable after death and during freezer storage and can be measured either in cerebrospinal fluid or in homogenised tissue.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0304-3940(95)12102-a

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Very few transcriptomic studies provide information on acute premortem variables or cause of death, which may potentially have a much larger effect on RNA quality and gene expression.

    “Additionally, very few transcriptomic studies provide information on acute premortem variables or cause of death, which are particularly important as they may potentially have a much larger effect on RNA quality and gene expression71–76,78–80.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harrison, P. J., Heath, P. R., Eastwood, S. L., Burnet, P. W. J., McDonald, B., & Pearson, R. C. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Harrison, P.J.
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-11
Volume
200
Issue
3
Pages
151-154
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090829912
Cited by
342
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 16
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Keywords
postmortem interval, agonal state, brain pH, polyadenylated RNA, receptor binding
MeSH terms
Acidosis, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Autoradiography, Brain Chemistry, Female, Humans, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Middle Aged, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Poly A, Postmortem Changes, RNA, Messenger, Time Factors, Gene Expression, In Situ Hybridization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review