Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 281

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Atrophy of the Cholinergic Basal Forebrain Over the Adult Age Range and in Early Stages of Alzheimer's Disease

Open access
Grothe, Michel, Heinsen, Helmut, Teipel, Stefan J.·2012·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background The basal forebrain cholinergic system (BFCS) is known to undergo moderate neurodegenerative changes during normal aging as well as severe atrophy in Alzheimer´s disease (AD). However, there is a controversy on how the cholinergic lesion in AD relates to early and incipient stages of the disease. In-vivo imaging studies on the structural integrity of the BFCS in normal and pathological aging are still rare. Methods We applied automated morphometry techniques in combination with high-dimensional image warping and a cytoarchitectonic map of BF cholinergic nuclei to a large cross-sectional dataset of high-resolution MRI scans, covering the whole adult age-range (20–94 years; N=211) as well as patients with very mild AD (vmAD; CDR=0.5; N=69) and clinically manifest AD (AD; CDR=1; N=28). For comparison, we investigated hippocampus volume using automated volumetry. Results Volume of the BFCS declined from early adulthood on and atrophy aggravated in advanced age. Volume reductions in vmAD were most pronounced in posterior parts of the nucleus basalis Meynert, while in AD atrophy was more extensive and included the whole BFCS. In clinically manifest AD, the diagnostic accuracy of BFCS volume reached the diagnostic accuracy of hippocampus volume. Conclusions Our findings indicate that cholinergic degeneration in AD occurs against a background of age-related atrophy and that exacerbated atrophy in AD can be detected at earliest stages of cognitive impairment. Automated in-vivo morphometry of the BFCS may become a useful tool to assess BF cholinergic degeneration in normal and pathological aging.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.06.019

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 281

Metadata

Authors
Grothe, M., Heinsen, H., & Teipel, S. J.
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-05
Volume
71
Issue
9
Pages
805-813
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034491173
Cited by
281
References
9
FWCI
6.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Atrophy of the Cholinergic Basal Forebrain Over the Adult Age Range and in Early Stages of Alzheimer's Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.06.019
The paper
Grothe, M., Heinsen, H., & Teipel, S. J. (2012). Atrophy of the Cholinergic Basal Forebrain Over the Adult Age Range and in Early Stages of Alzheimer's Disease. Biological Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.06.019

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.