Cited by 234Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchSchizophrenia research and treatmentGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Confirmation that the AKT1 (rs2494732) genotype influences the risk of psychosis in cannabis users

Open access
Di Forti, Marta, Iyegbe, Conrad, Sallis, Hannah, Kolliakou, Anna, Falcone, M. Aurora, Paparelli, Alessandra, Sirianni, Miriam, La Cascia, Caterina +10 more·2012·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Cannabis use is associated with an increased risk of psychosis. One study has suggested that genetic variation in the AKT1 gene might influence this effect.Methods In a case-control study of 489 first-episode psychosis patients and 278 control subjects, we investigated the interaction between variation at the AKT1 rs2494732 single nucleotide polymorphism and cannabis use in increasing the risk of psychosis.Results The rs2494732 locus was not associated with an increased risk of a psychotic disorder, with lifetime cannabis use, or with frequency of use. We did, however, find that the effect of lifetime cannabis use on risk of psychosis was significantly influenced by the rs2494732 locus (likelihood ratio statistic for the interaction = 8.54; p = .014). Carriers of the C/C genotype with a history of cannabis use showed a greater than twofold increased likelihood of a psychotic disorder (odds ratio = 2.18 [95% confidence interval: 1.12, 4.31]) when compared with users who were T/T carriers. Moreover, the interaction between the rs2494732 genotype and frequency of use was also significant at the 5% level (likelihood ratio = 13.39; p = .010). Among daily users, C/C carriers demonstrated a sevenfold increase in the odds of psychosis compared with T/T carriers (odds ratio = 7.23 [95% confidence interval: 1.37, 38.12]).Conclusions Our findings provide strong support for the initial report that genetic variation at rs2494732 of AKT1 influences the risk of developing a psychotic disorder in cannabis users.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.06.020

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More recently an interaction has been reported, and replicated in one study, between cannabis use and AKT1 on psychosis risk.

    “More recently an interaction has been reported (39), and replicated in one study, between cannabis use and AKT1 on psychosis risk (40); however there are substantial concerns around gene environment interaction studies (38,41), and currently evidence that effects of cannabis differ according to variation at AKT1 is not robust.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. World Health Organization (1992): International Classification of Dis- eases, 10th Edition (ICD-10): Classification of Mental and Behavioural Dis- orders. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  2. National Center for Biotechnology Information (2012): dbSNP Short Genetic Variations. Available at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP. Accessed February 2012.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Di Forti, M., Iyegbe, C., Sallis, H., Kolliakou, A., Falcone, M. A., Paparelli, A., Sirianni, M., La Cascia, C., Stilo, S. A., Marques, T. R., Handley, R., Mondelli, V., Dazzan, P., Pariante, C., David, A. S., Morgan, C., Powell, J., & Murray, R. M.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Magna Graecia University (IT)
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-11
Volume
72
Issue
10
Pages
811-816
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007497521
Cited by
234
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 3
FWCI
18.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
  • Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Psychiatry Research Trust
  • Seventh Framework Programme (HEALTH-F2-2009-241909)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
AKT1, single nucleotide polymorphisms, cannabis use, psychosis risk, first-episode psychosis, gene-environment interaction, daily cannabis use, genetic susceptibility
MeSH terms
Adult, Marijuana Abuse, Demography, Female, Genetic Testing, Humans, London, Male, Psychotic Disorders, Risk Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies, Episode of Care, Risk Assessment, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, International Classification of Diseases, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt, Gene-Environment Interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review