Cited by 159Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyTreatment of Major DepressionBipolar Disorder and Treatment

Genetic studies of major depressive disorder: why are there no genome-wide association study findings and what can we do about it?

Open access
Levinson, Douglas F., Mostafavi, Sara, Milaneschi, Yuri, Rivera, Margarita, Ripke, Stephan, Wray, Naomi R., Sullivan, Patrick F.·2014·Biological Psychiatry

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.07.029

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MDD has had notable difficulties with genetic discovery due to relatively low twin-heritability, but focusing on severe cases and increasing sample sizes has been fruitful.

    “As a common disorder with relatively low twin-heritability (Levinson et al., 2014), MDD has had notable difficulties with genetic discovery, but focusing on severe cases (CONVERGE Consortium, 2015) and increasing sample sizes has been particularly fruitful (Major Depressive Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, 2018).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levinson, D. F., Mostafavi, S., Milaneschi, Y., Rivera, M., Ripke, S., Wray, N. R., & Sullivan, P. F.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL)
  • Universidad de Granada (ES)
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Levinson, Douglas F.
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
76
Issue
7
Pages
510-512
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991928779
Cited by
159
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 3
FWCI
13.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • King’s College London
  • National Institutes of Health (U01 MH094421, U01 MH094411)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
major depressive disorder, genome-wide association study, genetic susceptibility, psychiatric genetics, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, gene pathways
MeSH terms
Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Female, Humans, Male, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study, DNA Copy Number Variations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review