The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neural correlates of attention bias to threat in post-traumatic stress disorder
Open accessAbstract
Attentional biases have been proposed to contribute to symptom maintenance in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), although the neural correlates of these processes have not been well defined; this was the goal of the present study. We administered an attention bias task, the dot probe, to a sample of 37 (19 control, 18 PTSD+) traumatized African-American adults during fMRI. Compared to controls, PTSD+ participants demonstrated increased activation in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) in response to threat cue trials. In addition, attentional avoidance of threat corresponded with increased ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC) and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) activation in the PTSD group, a pattern that was not observed in controls. These data provide evidence to suggest that relative increases in dlPFC, dACC and vlPFC activation represent neural markers of attentional bias for threat in individuals with PTSD, reflecting selective disruptions in attentional control and emotion processing networks in this disorder.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“First evidence from studies in healthy participants [17] as well as patients with generalized anxiety disorder [18]–[20], posttraumatic stress disorder [21], or panic disorder [22] suggests an involvement of dorsolateral [17], [19]–[21], dorsomedial [21], and ventrolateral [18], [21], [22] aspects of the prefrontal cortex in the processing of the attention bias towards threat-related stimuli.”
From They are laughing at me: Cerebral mediation of cognitive biases in social anxiety (2014) · cites this paper as [21]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn755 · Cited by 12,881
Emotional processing of fear: Exposure to corrective information.
Foa, E. B., & Kozak, M. J. (1986) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.99.1.20 · Cited by 5,396
Talairach, J., Tournoux, P., & Rayport, M. (1988) · Thieme eBooks · Cited by 5,058
The cognitive control of emotion
OCHSNER, K., & GROSS, J. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.010 · Cited by 4,495
The NimStim set of facial expressions: Judgments from untrained research participants.
Tottenham, N., Tanaka, J. W., Leon, A. C., McCarry, T., Nurse, M., Hare, T. A., Marcus, D. J., Westerlund, A., Casey, B., & Nelson, C. (2009) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2008.05.006 · Cited by 3,454
Etkin, A., & Wager, T. D. (2007) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07030504 · Cited by 3,391 · cited 1×
“…have also outlined the salience of ventral prefrontal regions in the management of conflicting, or distracting, emotional information; recent reviews highlight the increasing number of studies that revealed altered function within these networks in PTSD populations (Etkin & Wager, 2007).”
BackgroundEmotional processing in anterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortex
Etkin, A., Egner, T., & Kalisch, R. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.11.004 · Cited by 3,059
Binder, E. B. (2008) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.299.11.1291 · Cited by 1,362
Ekman, P., & Oster, H. (1979) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.30.020179.002523 · Cited by 1,228
A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli
Minear, M. E., & Park, D. C. (2004) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03206543 · Cited by 1,227
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Inflammation in Fear- and Anxiety-Based Disorders: PTSD, GAD, and Beyond
Michopoulos, V., Powers, A., Gillespie, C. F., Ressler, K. J., & Jovanovic, T. (2017) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2016.146 · Cited by 786
Stevens, J. S., Jovanovic, T., Fani, N., Ely, T. D., Glover, E. M., Bradley, B., & Ressler, K. J. (2013) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.05.031 · Cited by 293
Self-citationWiner, E. S., & Salem, T. (2015) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000022 · Cited by 264
Catarino, A., Küpper, C. S., Werner‐Seidler, A., Dalgleish, T., & Anderson, M. C. (2015) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797615569889 · Cited by 201
Angelidis, A., van der Does, W. A. J., Schakel, L., & Putman, P. (2016) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.09.008 · Cited by 179
Metadata
- Authors
- Fani, N., Jovanovic, T., Ely, T. D., Bradley, B., Gutman, D., Tone, E. B., & Ressler, K. J.
- Affiliations
- Emory University (US)
- Georgia State University (US)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fani, Negar
- Venue
- Biological Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-05
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 134-142
- ISSN
- 0301-0511 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3340884
- OpenAlex
- W2040185749
- Cited by
- 150
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 11.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Biological Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Digital Archive @ GSU (submittedVersion)
- Counseling And Psychological Services Dissertations (Georgia State University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000454)
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH 071537, R21MH098212, R01MH096764, R01MH071537, F32MH095456, R56MH071537)
- National Center for Research Resources (M01-RR00039, UL1RR025008, M01RR000039)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- post-traumatic stress disorder, attentional bias to threat, attentional avoidance, neural correlates, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, attentional control, emotional processing, African American adults
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Attention, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Facial Expression, Fear, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxygen, Photic Stimulation, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Bias, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
