Cited by 16Stress Responses and CortisolHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlMental Health Research Topics

Comparison of the Perceived Stress Reactivity Scale with physiological and self-reported stress responses during ecological momentary assessment and during participation in a virtual reality version of the Trier Social Stress Test

Open access
Weber, Jeannette, Heming, Meike, Apolinário-Hagen, Jennifer, Liszio, Stefan, Angerer, Peter·2024·Biological Psychology

Abstract

Valid approaches to conveniently measure stress reactivity are needed due to the growing evidence of its health-impairing effects. This study examined whether the Perceived Stress Reactivity Scale (PSRS) predicts cardiovascular and psychological responses to psychosocial stressors during daily life and during a virtual reality (VR) Trier Social Stress Test (TSST). Medical students answered a standardized baseline questionnaire to assess perceived stress reactivity by the PSRS. The PSRS asks participants to rate the intensity of their typical affective responses to common stressors during daily life. They were further asked to participate in a VR-TSST and in an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) over a period of three consecutive workdays during daily life. Blood pressure and self-reported stress were repeatedly, heart rate variability (HRV) continuously measured during the VR-TSST and EMA. Furthermore, participants repeatedly assessed task demands, task control and social conflict during the EMA. Data was analysed using multilevel analysis and multiple linear regression. Results indicate that the PSRS moderates associations between blood pressure (but not HRV) and demands and control during daily life. Furthermore, the PSRS directly predicted self-reported stress, but did not moderate associations between self-reported stress and demands, control and social conflict. The PSRS did not predict physiological and self-reported stress responses to the VR-TSST. This study partly confirmed convergent validity of the PSRS to stress reactivity in daily life. Furthermore, the lack of association between the PSRS and stress responses to the VR-TSST calls for future studies to search for reliable and valid ways to assess stress reactivity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108762

Cites

103 of 103 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weber, J., Heming, M., Apolinário-Hagen, J., Liszio, S., & Angerer, P.
Affiliations
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
  • Essen University Hospital (DE)
Corresponding author
Weber, Jeannette
Venue
Biological Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-02
Volume
186
Pages
108762
ISSN
0301-0511 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391474458
Cited by
16
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3
FWCI
4.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Univ. Duesseldorf: Duesseldorfer Dokumenten- und Publikationsserver (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
stress reactivity, psychosocial stress, Trier Social Stress Test, virtual reality, ecological momentary assessment, blood pressure, heart rate variability, self-reported stress, social conflict, convergent validity, medical students
MeSH terms
Ecological Momentary Assessment, Virtual Reality, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Psychological Tests, Stress, Psychological, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review