Cited by 195Psychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesStress Responses and Cortisol

The perceived stress reactivity scale: Measurement invariance, stability, and validity in three countries.

Schlotz, Wolff, Yim, Ilona S., Zoccola, Peggy M., Jansen, Lars, Schulz, Peter·2011·Psychological Assessment

Abstract

There is accumulating evidence that individual differences in stress reactivity contribute to the risk for stress-related disease. However, the assessment of stress reactivity remains challenging, and there is a relative lack of questionnaires reliably assessing this construct. We here present the Perceived Stress Reactivity Scale (PSRS), a 23-item questionnaire with 5 subscales and 1 overall scale, based on an existing German-language instrument. Perceived stress reactivity and related constructs were assessed in N = 2,040 participants from the United Kingdom, the United States, and Germany. The 5-factor structure of the PSRS was found to be similar in the 3 countries. In the U.S. sample the questionnaire was applied using 2 modes of administration (paper-pencil and computerized), and measures were repeated after 4 weeks. Measurement invariance analyses demonstrated full invariance across mode of administration and partial invariance across gender and countries. Scale scores differed between countries and genders, with women scoring higher on most scales. Overall, reliability analysis suggested good stability of PSRS scores over a 4-week period, and validation analysis showed expected associations with related constructs such as self-efficacy, neuroticism, chronic stress, and perceived stress. Perceived stress reactivity was also associated with depressive symptoms and sleep. These associations were particularly strong when individuals scoring high on perceived stress reactivity were exposed to chronic stress. In sum, our findings suggest that the PSRS is a useful and easy-to-administer instrument to assess perceived stress reactivity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0021148

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schlotz, W., Yim, I. S., Zoccola, P. M., Jansen, L., & Schulz, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • Universität Trier (DE)
Venue
Psychological Assessment
Published
2011-03
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
80-94
ISSN
  • 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-134X
OpenAlex
W2132170253
Cited by
194
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
9.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG SCHL 1708/1-1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
measurement invariance, cross-cultural validation, psychometric properties, chronic stress, depressive symptoms, sleep, self-efficacy, neuroticism, perceived stress, gender differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Germany, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Psychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Stress, Psychological, United States, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review