Cited by 231Edible Oils Quality and AnalysisPhytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesDate Palm Research Studies

Assessment of phenolics-enriched extract and fractions of olive leaves and their antioxidant activities

Open access
Lee, Ok-Hwan, Lee, Boo-Yong, Lee, Junsoo, Lee, Hee-Bong, Son, Jong-Youn, Park, Cheon-Seok, Shetty, Kalidas, Kim, Young-Cheul·2009·Bioresource Technology

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that olive leaf is a significant source of bioactive phenolic compounds comparable to olive oil and fruits. Identifying appropriate extraction methods is thus an important step to increase the yield of such bioactive components from olive leaf, which is otherwise agricultural waste. The present study evaluates phenolic contents and compositions of olive leaf extracted by several solvent methods and to further establish their antioxidant activities using various radical scavenging systems. Total flavonoid and phenolic contents were significantly higher in the 80% ethanol extract, butanol, and ethylacetate fractions than hexane, chloroform and water fractions (p<0.05). Oleuropein was identified as a major phenolic compound with considerable contents in these major three fractions and the extract that correlated with their higher antioxidant and radical scavenging. These results indicate that olive leaf contains significant amounts of oleuropein and phenolics, important factors for antioxidant capacity, which can be substantially modified by different extraction methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.06.059

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, O.-H., Lee, B.-Y., Lee, J., Lee, H.-B., Son, J.-Y., Park, C.-S., Shetty, K., & Kim, Y.-C.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
  • CHA University (KR)
  • Chungbuk National University (KR)
  • Hankyong National University (KR)
  • Kyung Hee University (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Young-Cheul
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-12
Volume
100
Issue
23
Pages
6107-6113
ISSN
0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065626182
Cited by
231
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 16
FWCI
5.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Date Palm Research Studies
Keywords
olive leaf, phenolic compounds, oleuropein, antioxidant activity, free radical scavenging, solvent extraction, ethanol extract, flavonoids, extraction optimization, agricultural waste valorization
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Antioxidants, Chloroform, Hexanes, Industrial Waste, Oxygen, Peroxides, Phenols, Plant Extracts, Pyrans, Water, Free Radical Scavengers, Linoleic Acid, Phenol, Olea, Iridoids, Iridoid Glucosides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review