Cited by 184Algal biology and biofuel productionLipid metabolism and biosynthesisMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction

Evaluation of methods to extract and quantify lipids from Synechocystis PCC 6803

Sheng, Jie, Vannela, Raveender, Rittmann, Bruce E.·2011·Bioresource Technology

Abstract

In order to use the photosynthetic cyanobacterium Synechocystis as a source of feedstock for carbon-neutral, nonpetroleum-based diesel fuel, we evaluated several solvents and solvent systems for their ability to extract lipid from wild-type Synechocystis PCC 6803. Chloroform+methanol-based Folch and Bligh & Dyer methods had the highest lipid recoveries. Less toxic solvents, such as methanol and MTBE, or direct trans-esterification of biomass (without pre-extraction step) gave only slightly lower lipid-extraction yields. Ethanol, isopropanol, butanol, hexane, acetic ester, and their combinations were not effective for lipid extraction from Synechocystis (>20% loss), even though they are widely used for non-polar lipid extraction from other feedstock, including algae. We confirmed the success of chloroform+methanol-based extraction by their penetration of the cell membrane system, higher polarity, and stronger interaction with hydrogen bonds. The less-polar solvents not only had lower lipid yield, but also extracted more non-lipid compounds that require extra purification to remove. We also characterized the fatty-acid profile of Synechocystis PCC 6803: C16:0 (∼60%), C16:1 (∼9.5%), C18:0 (∼1.2%), C18:1 (∼2%), C18:2 (∼9.8%), and C18:3 (∼16.5%).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.007

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sheng, J., Vannela, R., & Rittmann, B. E.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Sheng, Jie
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-01
Volume
102
Issue
2
Pages
1697-1703
ISSN
0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981460928
Cited by
184
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 10
FWCI
2.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Arizona State University
  • School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Keywords
Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, lipid extraction, Folch method, Bligh and Dyer method, solvent selection, fatty acid composition, biodiesel feedstock, transesterification, nonpolar solvents
MeSH terms
Biotechnology, Chromatography, Gas, Chromatography, Thin Layer, Diglycerides, Esters, Fatty Acids, Lipids, Solubility, Solvents, Triglycerides, Biomass, Synechocystis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review