The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Technological trends, global market, and challenges of bio-ethanol production
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chisti, Y. (2007) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.02.001 · Cited by 9,524
Brennan, L., & Owende, P. (2010) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2009.10.009 · Cited by 4,894
Li, Y., Horsman, M., Wu, N., Lan, C. Q., & Dubois‐Calero, N. (2008) · Biotechnology Progress · doi:10.1021/bp070371k · Cited by 1,134
Engineering Yeast Transcription Machinery for Improved Ethanol Tolerance and Production
Alper, H., Moxley, J., Nevoigt, E., Fink, G. R., & Stephanopoulos, G. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1131969 · Cited by 823 · cited 2×
“More recently, novel approaches have been devised and applied to improve ethanol production by S. cerevisiae, particularly genome shuffling (Shi et al., 2009; Hou, 2009) and global transcription machinery engineering (gTME) (Alper et al., 2006).”
Microalgal biomass as a fermentation feedstock for bioethanol production
Harun, R., Danquah, M. K., & Forde, G. M. (2010) · Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology · doi:10.1002/jctb.2287 · Cited by 616
Evolutionary engineering of mixed-sugar utilization by a xylose-fermenting strain
KUYPER, M., TOIRKENS, M., DIDERICH, J., WINKLER, A., VANDIJKEN, J., & PRONK, J. (2005) · FEMS Yeast Research · doi:10.1016/j.femsyr.2005.04.004 · Cited by 341
Evolutionary Engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for Anaerobic Growth on Xylose
Sonderegger, M., & Sauer, U. (2003) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.69.4.1990-1998.2003 · Cited by 251 · cited 1×
“Evolutionary engineering experiments were found most useful to improve the fermenting capacity of the previously constructed strains (Wisselink et al., 2007; Kuyper et al., 2005; Sonderegger and Sauer, 2003).”
BackgroundWisselink, H. W., Toirkens, M. J., Wu, Q., Pronk, J. T., & van Maris, A. J. A. (2009) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02268-08 · Cited by 247
Yeast metabolic engineering for hemicellulosic ethanol production
Van Vleet, J., & Jeffries, T. (2009) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2009.06.001 · Cited by 241
Wisselink, H. W., Toirkens, M. J., del Rosario Franco Berriel, M., Winkler, A. A., van Dijken, J. P., Pronk, J. T., & van Maris, A. J. A. (2007) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00177-07 · Cited by 209
Cited by
Progress and perspectives of electrochemical CO2 reduction on copper in aqueous electrolyte
Nitopi, S., Bertheussen, E., Scott, S. B., Liu, X., Engstfeld, A. K., Horch, S., Seger, B., Stephens, I. E. L., Chan, K., Hahn, C., et al. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00705 · Cited by 5,223
Bioethanol production from renewable sources: Current perspectives and technological progress
Zabed, H., Sahu, J. N., Suely, A., Boyce, A. N., & Faruq, G. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.076 · Cited by 852
Microalgae-based carbohydrates for biofuel production
Chen, C.-Y., Zhao, X.-Q., Yen, H.-W., Ho, S.-H., Cheng, C.-L., Lee, D.-J., Bai, F.-W., & Chang, J.-S. (2013) · Biochemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bej.2013.03.006 · Cited by 724
Bioethanol production using carbohydrate-rich microalgae biomass as feedstock
Ho, S.-H., Huang, S.-W., Chen, C.-Y., Hasunuma, T., Kondo, A., & Chang, J.-S. (2013) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.015 · Cited by 683
Commercial Biomass Syngas Fermentation.
Daniell, J., Köpke, M., & Simpson, S. (2012) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en5125372 · Cited by 444
Metadata
- Authors
- Mussatto, S. I., Dragone, G., Guimarães, P. M. R., Silva, J. P. A., Carneiro, L. M., Roberto, I. C., Vicente, A., Domingues, L., & Teixeira, J. A.
- Venue
- Biotechnology Advances
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 817-830
- ISSN
- 0734-9750 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2170140196
- Cited by
- 727
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 26.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
