Cited by 53Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchCellular transport and secretionNeural dynamics and brain function

Shape-induced asymmetric diffusion in dendritic spines allows efficient synaptic AMPA receptor trapping

Open access
Kusters, Remy, Kapitein, Lukas C., Hoogenraad, Casper C., Storm, Cornelis·2013·Biophysical Journal

Abstract

Dendritic spines are the primary postsynaptic sites of excitatory neurotransmission in the brain. They exhibit a remarkable morphological variety, ranging from thin protrusions, to stubby shapes, to bulbous mushroom shapes. The remodeling of spines is thought to regulate the strength of the synaptic connection, which depends vitally on the number and the spatial distribution of AMPA-type glutamate receptors (AMPARs). We present numerical and analytical analyses demonstrating that this shape strongly affects AMPAR diffusion. We report a pronounced suppression of the receptor exit rate out of spines with decreasing neck radius. Thus, mushroomlike spines become highly effective at retaining receptors in the spine head. Moreover, we show that the postsynaptic density further enhances receptor trapping, particularly in mushroomlike spines local exocytosis in the spine head, in contrast to release at the base, provides rapid and specific regulatory control of AMPAR concentration at synapses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.11.016

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More recent modeling studies report that shape should also affect lateral diffusion of proteins embedded in the plasma membrane.

    “In addition, more recent modeling studies report that shape should also affect lateral diffusion of proteins embedded in the plasma membrane (Kusters et al., 2013).”

    From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Kusters et al., 2013

  • Trapping of receptors may be facilitated by the curvature of plasma membrane in spines.

    “In addition, trapping of receptors may be facilitated by the curvature of plasma membrane in spines (Kusters et al., 2013), as discussed in detail below.”

    From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Kusters et al., 2013

  • Decreasing neck radius and increasing neck length effectively increase the confinement of receptors at the synapse.

    “In combination with an exocytic event in the head of the spine, a decreasing neck radius and increasing neck length effectively increase the confinement of receptors at the synapse, as can be seen in Figure 3B showing the time-evolution of receptor concentration after the release of 1000 receptors at the top of the spine (Kusters et al., 2013).”

    From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Kusters et al., 2013

  • The mean escape time of receptors through the neck of a typical mushroom-shaped spine follows a power-law dependence on neck radius r and neck length l.

    “More specifically, the characteristic timescale for retention, the mean escape time of receptors through the neck of a typical mushroom-shaped spines follows a power-law dependence on neck radius r, τescape~(rneck)−λ”

    From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Kusters et al., 2013

  • Mushroom shaped spines with an exocytosis site adjacent to the synapse are privileged over others, because they can rapidly and specifically regulate the synaptic AMPA receptor level.

    “Altogether, this modeling study concluded that mushroom shaped spines with an exocytosis site adjacent to the synapse are privileged over others, because they can rapidly and specifically regulate the synaptic AMPA receptor level (Kusters et al., 2013).”

    From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Kusters et al., 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kusters, R., Kapitein, L. C., Hoogenraad, C. C., & Storm, C.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Venue
Biophysical Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
105
Issue
12
Pages
2743-2750
ISSN
0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084272791
Cited by
53
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
dendritic spines, AMPA receptors, asymmetric diffusion, postsynaptic density, synaptic plasticity, glutamate receptor trafficking
MeSH terms
Animals, Exocytosis, Models, Neurological, Receptors, AMPA, Dendritic Spines, Rats, Post-Synaptic Density

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review