Shape-induced asymmetric diffusion in dendritic spines allows efficient synaptic AMPA receptor trapping
Open accessAbstract
Dendritic spines are the primary postsynaptic sites of excitatory neurotransmission in the brain. They exhibit a remarkable morphological variety, ranging from thin protrusions, to stubby shapes, to bulbous mushroom shapes. The remodeling of spines is thought to regulate the strength of the synaptic connection, which depends vitally on the number and the spatial distribution of AMPA-type glutamate receptors (AMPARs). We present numerical and analytical analyses demonstrating that this shape strongly affects AMPAR diffusion. We report a pronounced suppression of the receptor exit rate out of spines with decreasing neck radius. Thus, mushroomlike spines become highly effective at retaining receptors in the spine head. Moreover, we show that the postsynaptic density further enhances receptor trapping, particularly in mushroomlike spines local exocytosis in the spine head, in contrast to release at the base, provides rapid and specific regulatory control of AMPAR concentration at synapses.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
More recent modeling studies report that shape should also affect lateral diffusion of proteins embedded in the plasma membrane.
“In addition, more recent modeling studies report that shape should also affect lateral diffusion of proteins embedded in the plasma membrane (Kusters et al., 2013).”
From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Kusters et al., 2013
Trapping of receptors may be facilitated by the curvature of plasma membrane in spines.
“In addition, trapping of receptors may be facilitated by the curvature of plasma membrane in spines (Kusters et al., 2013), as discussed in detail below.”
From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Kusters et al., 2013
Decreasing neck radius and increasing neck length effectively increase the confinement of receptors at the synapse.
“In combination with an exocytic event in the head of the spine, a decreasing neck radius and increasing neck length effectively increase the confinement of receptors at the synapse, as can be seen in Figure 3B showing the time-evolution of receptor concentration after the release of 1000 receptors at the top of the spine (Kusters et al., 2013).”
From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Kusters et al., 2013
The mean escape time of receptors through the neck of a typical mushroom-shaped spine follows a power-law dependence on neck radius r and neck length l.
“More specifically, the characteristic timescale for retention, the mean escape time of receptors through the neck of a typical mushroom-shaped spines follows a power-law dependence on neck radius r, τescape~(rneck)−λ”
From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Kusters et al., 2013
Mushroom shaped spines with an exocytosis site adjacent to the synapse are privileged over others, because they can rapidly and specifically regulate the synaptic AMPA receptor level.
“Altogether, this modeling study concluded that mushroom shaped spines with an exocytosis site adjacent to the synapse are privileged over others, because they can rapidly and specifically regulate the synaptic AMPA receptor level (Kusters et al., 2013).”
From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Kusters et al., 2013
The timescale for an AMPA receptor reaching the synapse may be up to an order of magnitude faster than the time it takes for a receptor to exit through the neck of the spine.
“The timescale for an AMPA receptor reaching the synapse may be up to an order of magnitude faster that the time it takes for a receptor to exit through the neck of the spine.”
From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Kusters et al., 2013
Modeling studies show that typical mushroom-like morphology strongly alters lateral diffusion of AMPA receptors, with pronounced suppression of receptor exit rate out of spines with decreasing neck radius and increasing neck length.
“These observations have been rationalized by several modeling studies, which showed that the typical mushroom-like morphology of dendritic spines strongly alters the lateral diffusion of AMPA receptors, demonstrating a pronounced suppression of the receptor exit rate out of spines with decreasing neck radius as well as increasing neck length (Holcman and Schuss, 2011; Kusters et al., 2013; Kusters”
From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Kusters et al., 2013
Cites
Experience-dependent structural synaptic plasticity in the mammalian brain
Holtmaat, A., & Svoboda, K. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2699 · Cited by 1,934 · see citing works
The Postsynaptic Architecture of Excitatory Synapses: A More Quantitative View
Sheng, M., & Hoogenraad, C. C. (2007) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.76.060805.160029 · Cited by 1,003 · see citing works
Self-citationAMPA Receptor Incorporation into Synapses during LTP: The Role of Lateral Movement and Exocytosis
Makino, H., & Malinow, R. (2009) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.08.035 · Cited by 501 · see citing works
Ashby, M. C., Maier, S. R., Nishimune, A., & Henley, J. M. (2006) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1235-06.2006 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Regulation of AMPA receptor surface diffusion by PSD-95 slots
Opazo, P., Sainlos, M., & Choquet, D. (2012) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2011.10.010 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
A three-step model for the synaptic recruitment of AMPA receptors
Opazo, P., & Choquet, D. (2011) · Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.mcn.2010.08.014 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Diffusion laws in dendritic spines
Holcman, D., & Schuss, Z. (2011) · The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/2190-8567-1-10 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Richards, D. A., De Paola, V., Caroni, P., Gähwiler, B. H., & McKinney, R. A. (2004) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2004.062091 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization
Adrian, M., Kusters, R., Wierenga, C. J., Storm, C., Hoogenraad, C. C., & Kapitein, L. C. (2014) · Frontiers in Neuroanatomy · doi:10.3389/fnana.2014.00142 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
“…of the spine, a decreasing neck radius and increasing neck length effectively increase the confinement of receptors at the synapse, as can be seen in Figure 3B showing the time-evolution of receptor concentration after the release of 1000 receptors at the top of the spine (Kusters et al., 2013).”
InfluentialSelf-citationContreras, D., Piña, R., Carvallo, C., Godoy, F., Ugarte, G., Zeise, M., Rozas, C., & Morales, B. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23137099 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kusters, R., Kapitein, L. C., Hoogenraad, C. C., & Storm, C.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
- Venue
- Biophysical Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2743-2750
- ISSN
- 0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3882470
- OpenAlex
- W2084272791
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7
- FWCI
- 3.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Biophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion)
- TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- dendritic spines, AMPA receptors, asymmetric diffusion, postsynaptic density, synaptic plasticity, glutamate receptor trafficking
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Exocytosis, Models, Neurological, Receptors, AMPA, Dendritic Spines, Rats, Post-Synaptic Density
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review