Cited by 30Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Effects of apoE on neuronal signaling and APP processing in rodent brain

Hoe, Hyang-Sook, Pocivavsek, Ana, Dai, Haining, Chakraborty, Geetanjali, Harris, D. Christopher, Rebeck, G. William·2006·Brain Research

Abstract

We previously reported that primary neuronal cells treated with apolipoprotein E (apoE) or an apoE-derived peptide (EP) increased ERK activation and decreased JNK activation via apoE receptors. Here, we examined if the effects observed in vitro were observed in vivo. Similar to our observations in primary neurons, in vivo we found that injections of 2muM EP into the rat hippocampus increased the levels of ERK activation and decreased JNK activation. However, the time course of these effects was slower in vivo. Immunohistochemical analysis of the tissue showed prominently increased ERK phosphorylation and decreased JNK phosphorylation in neuronal cells throughout the hippocampus, particularly in the CA3 regions. To determine if apoE was endocytosed by neurons, we conjugated fluorescent microspheres with the EP and injected them into the rat hippocampus. After 7 days, the microspheres were present in neurons. We also examined the in vivo effects of apoE on ApoEr2 and APP processing. EP and full-length apoE3 and apoE4 increased C-terminal fragments of ApoEr2 and APP after a single injection, multiple injections, and chronic infusion paradigms. ApoE3 produced higher levels of ApoEr2 and APP C-terminal fragments than apoE4. These results demonstrate that apoE alters ApoEr2 and APP processing in vivo. The increase in ERK activation is consistent with a role for apoE in a neuronal response to stress, and the decrease in JNK activation suggests that apoE may have anti-apoptotic effec…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.07.035

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoe, H.-S., Pocivavsek, A., Dai, H., Chakraborty, G., Harris, D. C., & Rebeck, G. W.
Affiliations
Georgetown University (US)
Corresponding author
Rebeck, G. William
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-09
Volume
1112
Issue
1
Pages
70-79
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058786449
Cited by
30
References
3
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (AG14473)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
apolipoprotein E, ERK activation, JNK activation, ApoER2, APP processing, APP C-terminal fragments, hippocampus, CA3, neuronal stress response, anti-apoptotic effects, APOE3, APOE ε4, in vivo effects
MeSH terms
Animals, Apolipoproteins E, Brain, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Endocytosis, Enzyme Activation, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Neurons, Peptides, Phosphopyruvate Hydratase, Phosphorylation, Time Factors, Blotting, Western, Signal Transduction, Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Receptors, Lipoprotein, LDL-Receptor Related Proteins, JNK Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases, Extracellular Signal-Regulated MAP Kinases, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review