Cited by 91Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury Research

A preliminary study of alterations in default network connectivity in post-traumatic stress disorder patients following recent trauma

Qin, Ling-di, Wang, Zhen, Sun, Ya-wen, Wan, Jie-qing, Su, Shan-shan, Zhou, Yan, Xu, Jian-rong·2012·Brain Research

Abstract

This study used resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate whether functional connectivity is altered in people developing post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) following recent trauma. Sixty-two participants who had experienced recent acute traumatic events underwent a 7.3 min resting fMRI scan within 2 days post accident. Of these, 22 participants were diagnosed with PTSD within 1 to 6 months. Nineteen age- and sex-matched subjects without PTSD were selected as the trauma-exposed control group. Posterior cingulate cortex connectivity was determined from 17 PTSD patients and 15 control subjects by investigating synchronic low-frequency fMRI signal fluctuations using a temporal correlation method. To assess the relationship between PTSD symptom severity and PCC connectivity, the contrast image representing areas correlated with the PCC was correlated with the 17 PTSD subjects' Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) scores at diagnosis. Compared with the control group, PTSD patients exhibited decreased functional connectivity in the right lingual and right middle temporal gyri, and left lingual/posterior cingulate cortex. The left inferior temporal gyrus, right middle temporal gyrus, left middle temporal gyrus/insula, left medial frontal lobe/anterior cingulate cortex, and right medial frontal gyrus also showed increased connectivity within two days post accident. A negative correlation was found between PCC connectivity and CAPS scores in the left medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). These results suggest that patients who develop PTSD exhibit different resting-state patterns of neuronal activity following recent trauma. Abnormal FC of mPFC may be a major risk factor predisposing patients to the development of PTSD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.09.029

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Qin, L.-D., Wang, Z., Sun, Y.-W., Wan, J.-Q., Su, S.-S., Zhou, Y., & Xu, J.-R.
Affiliations
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Zhen
  • Zhou, Yan
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-11
Volume
1484
Pages
50-56
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048138495
Cited by
91
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5
FWCI
4.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, default mode network, resting-state functional connectivity, posterior cingulate cortex, medial prefrontal cortex, PTSD symptom severity, temporal correlation, trauma exposure, PTSD risk factors
MeSH terms
Accidents, Traffic, Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neural Pathways, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review