Cited by 4Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Bridging the gap between structural and metabolic neuroimaging via MRI-to-PET synthesis: a tri-attention enhanced GAN approach

Sheng, Jinhua, Zhu, Haodi, Zhou, Rougang, Zhang, Qiao, Wang, Jialei, Ying, Ziyi·2025·Brain Research

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) are two essential neuroimaging modalities that provide complementary structural and metabolic information about the brain, thereby enhancing diagnostic precision for brain disorders such as Alzheimer's disease (AD). To address the limitations of missing modality data, we propose a novel 3D GAN-based framework for MRI-to-PET neuroimage synthesis, incorporating a Tri-Attention module to integrate spatial, channel, and frequency attention across multiple scales. The proposed method enables the generation of complementary metabolism information by synthesizing PET scans, effectively bridging the modality gap. The effectiveness of the proposed method is evaluated on a subset of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset. Experimental results demonstrate the superiority of our approach, achieving significant improvements in image quality metrics (SSIM: 0.882, PSNR: 26.508) and clinical metrics (SUVR), outperforming state-of-the-art methods. These findings underscore the potential of our framework to bridge the gap between structural and metabolic information, offering a promising tool for cross-modality neuroimage synthesis and clinical applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brainres.2025.149691

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sheng, J., Zhu, H., Zhou, R., Zhang, Q., Wang, J., & Ying, Z.
Affiliations
  • Hangzhou Dianzi University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Sheng, Jinhua
  • Zhou, Rougang
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-09
Volume
1862
Pages
149691
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4410432015
Cited by
4
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Zhejiang Province Natural Science Foundation (LZ24F010007)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62271177)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
generative adversarial networks, brain glucose metabolism, Alzheimer's disease, ADNI, standardized uptake value ratio
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Positron-Emission Tomography, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review