Cited by 106Memory and Neural MechanismsPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

A randomized controlled trial of the effect of D-cycloserine on extinction and fear conditioning in humans

Guastella, Adam J., Lovibond, Peter F., Dadds, Mark R., Mitchell, Philip, Richardson, Rick·2007·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Previous research has shown that D-cycloserine (DCS) facilitates extinction of Pavlovian fear conditioning in rats and enhances exposure therapy in humans. The aim of this study was to test the effect of DCS on extinction of fear conditioning in humans. In three experiments, 238 participants were given either DCS (50 or 500 mg) or placebo 2-3 h before extinction training following a differential shock conditioning paradigm. Clear extinction and recovery (return of fear) effects were observed on both skin conductance and self-reported shock expectancy measures in three studies. DCS had no influence on these effects. The same pattern was observed when the analysis was restricted to aware participants or to good conditioners, when fear-relevant cues (pictures of snakes) were used as the conditioned stimuli, or when analysis was restricted to heightened snake-fearful participants. These results suggest that DCS may not enhance the extinction, or prevent the recovery, of learned fear in a differential Pavlovian conditioning paradigm in humans. Further experimental research is needed to better understand the mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effects of DCS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2006.07.005

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • D-cycloserine (DCS), an NMDA receptor partial agonist, facilitated extinction learning in rats; this finding was replicated in rodents but not replicated using skin conductance and expectancy ratings in humans.

    “Walker et al. (64) found that d-cycloserine (DCS), an NMDA receptor partial agonist, facilitated extinction learning in rats; a finding that was later replicated by several other groups employing multiple types of fear learning paradigms in rodents [e.g., Ref. (65)] but not replicated using skin conductance and expectancy ratings in humans (66).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guastella, A. J., Lovibond, P. F., Dadds, M. R., Mitchell, P., & Richardson, R.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Guastella, Adam J.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-04
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
663-672
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2096494352
Cited by
106
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 15
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
D-cycloserine, fear extinction, fear conditioning, post-extinction recovery, skin conductance, fear of snakes, phobia treatment
MeSH terms
Adult, Conditioning, Classical, Cycloserine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Electroshock, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review