Cited by 75Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Augmentation of exposure therapy with post-session administration of D-cycloserine

Open access
Tart, Candyce D., Handelsman, Pamela R., DeBoer, Lindsey B., Rosenfield, David, Pollack, Mark H., Hofmann, Stefan G., Powers, Mark B., Otto, Michael W. +1 more·2013·Journal of Psychiatric Research

Abstract

Background Pre-session administration of d-cycloserine (DCS) has been found to augment exposure therapy outcomes in a variety of anxiety disorders. To be able to enhance learning only for successful exposure sessions, it would be beneficial to have the option of administering DCS after rather than before the session, a strategy encouraged by pre-clinical work. We believe the present study is the first published report on the efficacy of post-session administration of DCS in humans.Method Adults (N = 29) with a DSM-IV diagnosis of acrophobia were randomized to receive two sessions of virtual reality exposure therapy (VRE) in combination with placebo or 50 mg of DCS. Instead of administering the pill prior to each of the sessions, as has been done in extant work, we administered the pill immediately following each session. Measures of acrophobia severity were collected at baseline, at each treatment session, 1-week post-treatment, and at 1-month follow-up.Results Mixed-effects repeated-measures ANOVAs and GLMMs revealed significant improvement in all outcome measures over time, but no between-group differences were observed. At post-treatment, 63.5% of patients in the placebo condition vs. 60.0% of those in the DCS condition were in remission. At 1-month follow up, 63.4% of those in the placebo condition vs. 66.6% of those in the DCS condition were in remission.Conclusions These findings do not support the application of post-session DCS administration for augmenting the efficacy of exposure-based treatments. Possible reasons for these findings are discussed.Trial registry The Trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01102803).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.09.024

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Singer JD Willett JB Applied longitudinal data analysis: methods for studying change and event occurrence 2003 New York Oxford University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tart, C. D., Handelsman, P. R., DeBoer, L. B., Rosenfield, D., Pollack, M. H., Hofmann, S. G., Powers, M. B., Otto, M. W., & Smits, J. A. J.
Affiliations
  • Southern Methodist University (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Tart, Candyce D.
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-02
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
168-174
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049480064
Cited by
75
References
47
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 10
FWCI
12.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) (R01MH075889)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
D-cycloserine, acrophobia, virtual reality exposure therapy, anxiety disorders, fear extinction, remission
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Antimetabolites, Avoidance Learning, Cycloserine, Female, Humans, Implosive Therapy, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Phobic Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review