Cited by 48Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentSchizophrenia research and treatment

Recognition and evaluation of emotional prosody in individuals with generalized social phobia: a pilot study

Quadflieg, Susanne, Wendt, Beate, Mohr, Alexander, Miltner, Wolfgang H.R., Straube, Thomas·2007·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Studies using facial emotional expressions as stimuli partially support the assumption of biased processing of social signals in social phobia. This pilot study explored for the first time whether individuals with social phobia display a processing bias towards emotional prosody. Fifteen individuals with generalized social phobia and fifteen healthy controls (HC) matched for gender, age, and education completed a recognition test consisting of meaningless utterances spoken in a neutral, angry, sad, fearful, disgusted or happy tone of voice. Participants also evaluated the stimuli with regard to valence and arousal. While these ratings did not differ significantly between groups, analysis of the recognition test revealed enhanced identification of sad and fearful voices and decreased identification of happy voices in individuals with social phobia compared with HC. The two groups did not differ in their processing of neutral, disgust, and anger prosody.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2007.08.003

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quadflieg, S., Wendt, B., Mohr, A., Miltner, W. H. R., & Straube, T.
Affiliations
  • Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology (DE)
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Corresponding author
Straube, Thomas
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-12
Volume
45
Issue
12
Pages
3096-3103
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2033446788
Cited by
48
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
generalized social phobia, emotional prosody, voice emotion recognition, emotional valence, emotional arousal, emotional facial expressions
MeSH terms
Adult, Arousal, Emotions, Female, Germany, Humans, Male, Phobic Disorders, Pilot Projects, Social Perception, Speech, Verbal Behavior, Case-Control Studies, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review