Cited by 142Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesFace Recognition and PerceptionMemory Processes and Influences

Memory Bias in Generalized Social Phobia

Open access
Foa, Edna B, Gilboa-Schechtman, Eva, Amir, Nader, Freshman, Melinda·2000·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

In two experiments, the authors examined memory for facial emotional expressions in patients with generalized social phobia (GSP) and in nonanxious control (NAC) participants. Three main questions were addressed. First, do patients with GSP differ from NAC participants in their overall memory for facial expressions? Second, do patients with GSP exhibit a memory bias for negative versus nonnegative expressions? Third, if such a bias exists, is it specific to angry expressions? The results of both experiments indicated that patients with GSP have better memory for all facial expressions than do NAC participants. Results of experiment 2 suggest that patients with GSP exhibit enhanced recognition for negative compared with nonnegative expressions; in contrast, NAC participants did not exhibit such enhancement. Results concerning specificity were equivocal. The importance of examining cognitive biases in patients with GSP via the use of facial expression is discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0887-6185(00)00036-0

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GSAD patients exhibit attentional biases for threatening social information and exaggerated affective responses to aversive social cues.

    “For example, laboratory studies have shown that GSAD patients exhibit attentional biases for threatening social information (Foa et al, 2000;Mogg et al, 2004), and exaggerated affective responses to aversive social cues (Hermann et al, 2002;Roelofs et al, 2009).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Foa, E. B., Gilboa-Schechtman, E., Amir, N., & Freshman, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of Georgia (US)
Corresponding author
Foa, Edna B
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-09
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
501-519
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W147425938
Cited by
142
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH49340)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
generalized social phobia, facial emotion recognition, memory bias, negative emotional expression, anger, cognitive biases, anxiety disorders
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Analysis of Variance, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Phobic Disorders, Mental Recall, Case-Control Studies, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review