The DOI matches its Crossref record; 146 of the 150 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): An analysis of methodological and conceptual challenges
Abstract
In a bold effort to address the longstanding shortcomings of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) framework for the classification and diagnosis of psychopathology, the National Institute of Mental Health recently launched a research program - the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) - in the hopes of developing an alternative taxonomic system rooted in dysfunctional brain circuitry. Although the RDoC endeavor has considerable promise, it faces several methodological and conceptual challenges, four of which I address here: (a) an overemphasis on biological units and measures, (b) neglect of measurement error, (c) biological and psychometric limitations of endophenotypes, and (d) the distinction between biological predispositions and their behavioral manifestations. Because none of these challenges is in principle insurmountable, I encourage investigators to consider potential remedies for them. RDoC is a calculated gamble that appears to be worth the risk, but its chances of success will be maximized by a thoughtful consideration of hard-won lessons learned--but frequently forgotten--over the past several decades of psychological and psychiatric research.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the RDoC initiative has been met with its own set of critiques, including an underdeveloped conceptual framework, an overemphasis on biological units, neglect of the psychometric weaknesses and measurement error of some methods, inadequate consideration of developmental factors and socio-cultural contexts, and a disconnect between research and clinical practice [109-114]”
From Advancing the study of sluggish cognitive tempo via DSM, RDoC, and hierarchical models of psychopathology (2019) · cites this paper as [114]
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
American Psychiatric Association (2013) · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 · Cited by 116,369
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0734 · Cited by 15,798
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J., & Munafò, M. R. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3475 · Cited by 7,641 · cited 2×
“Adding to these replicability concerns are findings that the average statistical power of functioning brain imaging studies is only about 8%, which is considerably lower than in most other domains of psychological and psychiatric research (Button et al., 2013).”
BackgroundInsel, T., Cuthbert, B., Garvey, M., Heinssen, R., Pine, D. S., Quinn, K., Sanislow, C., & Wang, P. (2010) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09091379 · Cited by 7,067
Spitzer, R. L. (1978) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1978.01770300115013 · Cited by 6,946
The Endophenotype Concept in Psychiatry: Etymology and Strategic Intentions
Gottesman, I. I., & Gould, T. D. (2003) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.4.636 · Cited by 5,615
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition
(2013) · American Psychiatric Association Publishing eBooks · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.893619 · Cited by 4,412
Madison, P., & Mischel, W. (1968) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421067 · Cited by 4,395
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Insel, 2013, Transforming diagnosis, NIMH Director’s Blog
- O'Connor, 1994, Emergent properties, American Philosophical Quarterly, 91
- Weinberger, 2014, RDoCs redux, World Psychiatry, 36
- 1998, Vol. 4
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Clark, L. A., Cuthbert, B., Lewis-Fernández, R., Narrow, W. E., & Reed, G. M. (2017) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100617727266 · Cited by 688
“adapt to particular social circumstances; emergent properties of neurobiological structures can lead to healthy adaptation or pathology across different environments; and self-reflection, narrative interpretation of experience, and patterns of interaction with others (called the interactome after the connectome, which…”
BackgroundThe NIMH research domain criteria initiative: Background, issues, and pragmatics
Kozak, M. J., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2016) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.12518 · Cited by 655
“This issue for the RDoC approach has already been highlighted by Berenbaum (2013) and reiterated by Lilienfield (2014), and addressed directly by Cuth-bert and Kozak (2013) and Cuthbert (2014).”
BackgroundMethodAnnual Research Review: Suicide among youth – epidemiology, (potential) etiology, and treatment
Cha, C. B., Franz, P. J., M. Guzmán, E., Glenn, C. R., Kleiman, E. M., & Nock, M. K. (2018) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12831 · Cited by 602
“…greater attention (e.g. neglect of measurement error when assessing mechanisms; ignoring potential distinctions between biological predispositions from behavioral manifestations; poor conceptual validity; underemphasized role of the environment; Lilienfeld, 2014; Lilienfeld & Treadway, 2016).”
BackgroundAnnual Research Review: Building a science of personalized intervention for youth mental health
Ng, M. Y., & Weisz, J. R. (2016) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12470 · Cited by 291
“…researchers would be wise to consider possible challenges (e.g. risk of biological reductionism which limits understanding of psychopathology, psychometric problems of laboratory-based measures) as well as ways to address them (see Franklin, Jamieson, Glenn, & Nock, 2014; Lilienfeld, 2014).”
The C factor: cognitive dysfunction as a transdiagnostic dimension in psychopathology
Abramovitch, A., Short, T., & Schweiger, A. (2021) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102007 · Cited by 269
“As aptly put by Lilienfeld (2014): “ Yet investigators … must be careful not to confuse biological mediation with biological etiology.”
BackgroundClashing diagnostic approaches: DSM-ICD versus RDoC
Lilienfeld, S. O., & Treadway, M. T. (2016) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093122 · Cited by 275
“A key distinction that has received little attention in the RDoC literature is that between biological predispositions to psychopathology and their behavioral manifestations (Lilienfeld 2014b).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationRoefs, A., Fried, E. I., Kindt, M., Martijn, C., Elzinga, B., Evers, A. W. M., Wiers, R. W., Borsboom, D., & Jansen, A. (2022) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2022.104096 · Cited by 185
“The classification manuals advanced the field tremendously, but they have also been criticised for their lack of reliability, validity, and clinical utility (e.g., Borsboom, 2008; Lilienfeld, 2014).”
BackgroundBaskin-sommers, A. R., & Foti, D. (2015) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.01.011 · Cited by 173
“other processes as predicted (Lilienfeld, 2014).”
Menon, B. (2019) · Medical Hypotheses · doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2019.109385 · Cited by 154
Exercise and Alcohol Consumption: What We Know, What We Need to Know, and Why it is Important
Leasure, J. L., Neighbors, C., Henderson, C. E., & Young, C. M. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00156 · Cited by 168
“The distinctions that can be drawn at the level of brain functioning may not clearly translate upward to behavior-based measures such as screening measures and diagnostic interviews (130).”
BackgroundIn pursuit of truth: A critical examination of meta-analyses of cognitive behavior therapy
Wampold, B. E., Flückiger, C., Re, A. C. D., Yulish, N. E., Frost, N. D., Pace, B. T., Goldberg, S. B., Miller, S. D., Baardseth, T. P., Laska, K. M., et al. (2016) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503307.2016.1249433 · Cited by 133
“Alternative ways to conceptualize, understand, and treat mental disorders are gaining scientific attention, including Research Domain Criteria (Lilienfeld, 2014) and trans-diagnostic treatments (Barlow et al., 2011).”
BackgroundLilienfeld, S. O., Sauvigné, K. C., Lynn, S. J., Cautin, R. L., Latzman, R. D., & Waldman, I. D. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01100 · Cited by 140
Self-citationArrondo, G., Segarra, N., Metastasio, A., Ziauddeen, H., Spencer, J., Reinders, N. R., Dudas, R. B., Robbins, T. W., Fletcher, P. C., & Murray, G. K. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01280 · Cited by 130
“ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 26 August 2015 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01280 Frontiers in Psychology | www.frontiersin.org 1 August 2015 | Volume 6 | Article 1280 Edited by: Eduardo A. Garza-Villarreal, National Institute of Psychiatry, Mexico Reviewed by: Sharna Jamadar, Monash University, Australia Kristine Rømer Thoms…”
BackgroundInfluentialThe role of dynamic risk factors in the explanation of offending
Ward, T. J., & Fortune, C. (2016) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2016.06.007 · Cited by 128
The cognitive neuropsychology of obsessive-compulsive disorder: a critical review
Abramovitch, A., & Cooperman, A. (2015) · Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jocrd.2015.01.002 · Cited by 126
Tiego, J., Martin, E. A., DeYoung, C. G., Hagan, K. E., Cooper, S. E., Pasion, R., Satchell, L. P., Shackman, A. J., Bellgrove, M. A., Fornito, A., et al. (2023) · Nature Mental Health · doi:10.1038/s44220-023-00057-5 · Cited by 122
Glenn, C. R., Cha, C. B., Kleiman, E. M., & Nock, M. K. (2017) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702616686854 · Cited by 113
“The prioritization of neural systems is problematic in terms of both reliability (measurement error at these more “objective” units of analysis is overlooked: Hajcak & Patrick, 2015; Lilienfeld, 2014) and validity (psychological/mental states cannot be reduced to physical/brain systems: Barrett, 2012; Miller, 2010).”
BackgroundHajcak, G., Meyer, A. M., & Kotov, R. (2017) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/abn0000274 · Cited by 116
“The psychometric properties of most neural measures that have been examined in relation to psychopathology and other individual difference variables have not been evaluated sufficiently (Hajcak & Patrick, 2015; Lilienfeld, 2014).”
RDoC: Translating promise into progress.
Patrick, C. J., & Hajcak, G. (2016) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.12612 · Cited by 105
“…leading scholars in the psychopathology area have called attention to limitations of the RDoC research framework and raised questions about its ability to alter diagnostic conceptions and advance knowledge in significant ways (Kraemer, 2015; Lilienfeld, 2014; Weinberger, Glick, & Klein, 2015).”
BackgroundHengartner, M. P., & Lehmann, S. N. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00101 · Cited by 127
Gäebel, W., & Zielasek, J. (2015) · Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.31887/dcns.2015.17.1/wgaebel · Cited by 110
Individual differences in computational psychiatry: A review of current challenges
Karvelis, P., Paulus, M. P., & Diaconescu, A. O. (2023) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105137 · Cited by 122
Yancey, J. R., Venables, N. C., & Patrick, C. J. (2016) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.12512 · Cited by 107
“As discussed in detail by Lilienfeld (2014), these include the strong emphasis of RDoC on biological measures (at the risk of ignoring other domains of measurement) and psychometric considerations such as measurement error and construct validity.”
Andershed, H., Colins, O. F., Salekin, R. T., Lordos, A., Kyranides, M. N., & Fanti, K. A. (2018) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-018-9659-5 · Cited by 106
“Both continuous and categorical approaches are useful and necessary (Lilienfeld 2014), and we encourage researchers to come up with alternatives and better strategies to compare the CU traits only versus multidimensional psychopathy approaches.”
BackgroundPsychometric properties of neural responses to monetary and social rewards across development
Ethridge, P., & Weinberg, A. (2018) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.01.011 · Cited by 100
Boness, C. L., Watts, A. L., Moeller, K. N., & Sher, K. J. (2021) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000333 · Cited by 102
Colins, O. F., Andershed, H., Salekin, R. T., & Fanti, K. A. (2018) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-018-9653-y · Cited by 91
“Both continuous and categorical approaches are useful and necessary (see for example also Farrington and Loeber, 2000; Lilienfeld 2014).”
BackgroundHaeffel, G. J., Jeronimus, B. F., Kaiser, B. N., Weaver, L. J., Soyster, P. D., Fisher, A. J., Vargas, I., Goodson, J. T., & Lu, W. (2021) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/21677026211002500 · Cited by 95
“, Knottnerus, J. A., Green, L., van der Horst, H., Jadad, A. R., Kromhout, D., Leonard, B., Lorig, K., Loureiro, M. I., van der Meer, J. W., Schnabel, P., Smith, R., van Weel, C., & Smid, H. (2011). How should we define health? BMJ, 343, Article 4163.”
InfluentialRoss, C. A., & Margolis, R. L. (2019) · Complex Psychiatry · doi:10.1159/000501797 · Cited by 93
Becker, S. P., & Willcutt, E. G. (2019) · European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s00787-018-1136-x · Cited by 85
Luking, K. R., Nelson, B. D., Infantolino, Z. P., Sauder, C. L., & Hajcak, G. (2016) · Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2016.12.004 · Cited by 87
“Such biologically oriented approaches to understanding psychopathology and individual differences require neural measures with good psychometric properties (2).”
A comprehensive theory of dynamic risk and protective factors
Heffernan, R., & Ward, T. J. (2017) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2017.10.003 · Cited by 68
Shankman, S. A., & Gorka, S. M. (2015) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.01.001 · Cited by 79
“The existing published papers on RDoC have not directly discussed the importance of risk to the initiative (although see Lilienfeld, 2014).”
BackgroundWu, X., He, H. G., Shi, L., Xia, Y., Zuang, K., Feng, Q., Zhang, Y., Ren, Z., Wei, D., & Qiu, J. (2018) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2018.11.002 · Cited by 74
Roche, M. J., Jacobson, N. C., & Pincus, A. L. (2016) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/abn0000177 · Cited by 78
“Harkness, Reynolds, and Lilienfeld (2014) provide a compelling adaptive systems framework where the dimensions of Criterion B are understood as representing failures in the evolutionary system of danger detection (negative affectivity, internalizing anxious disorders), resource acquisition…”
BackgroundRDoC and Psychopathology among Youth: Misplaced Assumptions and an Agenda for Future Research
Beauchaine, T. P., & Hinshaw, S. P. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2020.1750022 · Cited by 74
“…for diagnostic purposes when instead it is explicitly – at least to date – meant to guide basic research on vulnerabilities to and expressions of psychopathology (for further discussion see Franklin et al., 2015; Lilienfeld, 2014; Lilienfeld & Treadway, 2016).1 These are legitimate concerns.”
BackgroundKaye, J. T., Bradford, D. E., & Curtin, J. J. (2016) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.12663 · Cited by 70
“Psychology and related disciplines have a rich history of rigorous psychometric evaluation of their self-report measures, but the reliability and validity of physiological measures within laboratory tasks have often been presumed rather than demonstrated (Lilienfeld, 2014).”
BackgroundThe effort-doors task: Examining the temporal dynamics of effort-based reward processing using ERPs
Bowyer, C. B., Brush, C. J., Threadgill, A. H., Harmon‐Jones, E., Treadway, M. T., Patrick, C. J., & Hajcak, G. (2021) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117656 · Cited by 75
“…the current study, there is a growing emphasis n moving beyond investigation of unitary constructs pertaining to reard processing, and instead examining the multidimensional nature f reward processing as related to different forms of psychopathology e.g., Berridge et al., 2009 ; Lilienfeld, 2014 ).”
A network approach can improve eating disorder conceptualization and treatment
Levinson, C. A., Cusack, C. E., Brown, M. L., & Smith, A. R. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00062-y · Cited by 79
Epistemological Pluralism and Scientific Development: An Argument Against Authoritative Nosologies
Markon, K. E. (2013) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi.2013.27.5.554 · Cited by 67
From Engrams to Pathologies of the Brain
Denny, C. A., Lebois, E. P., & Ramirez, S. (2017) · Frontiers in Neural Circuits · doi:10.3389/fncir.2017.00023 · Cited by 65
“…that is practically useful by both physicians and researchers. observational nosology does not lend itself to being concretely linked to the circuitry of the brain, the RDoC framework has suffered from criticism in many ways opposite to that of the DSM (Lillienfeld, 2014; Casey et al., 2015).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialFrom Affective Science to Psychiatric Disorder: Ontology as a Semantic Bridge
Larsen, R. R., & Hastings, J. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00487 · Cited by 62
“However, the RDoC proposal has had a mixed reception in its current form, being criticized for failing to adequately address the challenges it was designed for, while moreover introducing other problems, such as a lack of construct validity and a disconnect from clinical relevance (12– 15).”
BackgroundDrover, S. S. M., Villanger, G. D., Aase, H., Skogheim, T. S., Longnecker, M. P., Zoeller, R. T., Reichborn‐Kjennerud, T., Knudsen, G. P., Zeiner, P., & Engel, S. M. (2018) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0000000000000937 · Cited by 67
Wildes, J. E., & Marcus, M. D. (2015) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-015-0572-2 · Cited by 68
Towards a new conceptual framework for psychopathology: Embodiment, enactivism, and embedment
Nielsen, K., & Ward, T. J. (2018) · Theory & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959354318808394 · Cited by 58
“First, the claim that the RDoC is too neurocentric (Berenbaum, 2013; Hershenberg & Goldfried, 2015; Hoffman & Zachar, 2017; Kirmayer & Crafa, 2014; Lilienfeld, 2014; Lilienfeld & Treadway, 2016).”
BackgroundInfluentialHearing Voices and Other Matters of the Mind
McCauley, R. N., & Graham, G. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190091149.001.0001 · Cited by 70
Understanding the role of psychopathology in bariatric surgery outcomes
Marek, R. J., Ben‐Porath, Y. S., & Heinberg, L. J. (2016) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.12356 · Cited by 61
“Many of these more narrowly focused constructs within the hierarchical models of psychopathology are similar to those outlined in the RDoC framework rather than diagnostic systems (such as the DSM or ICD) that do not represent valid disease entities (88,136).”
BackgroundCoordinated pluralism as a means to facilitate integrative taxonomies of cognition
Sullivan, J. A. (2017) · Philosophical Explorations · doi:10.1080/13869795.2017.1312497 · Cited by 56
From dynamic risk factors to causal processes: a methodological framework
Ward, T. J., & Fortune, C. (2015) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2015.1117080 · Cited by 55
“…systems Intense debate has occurred in the area of psychopathology for the last 30 years or so, concerning the nature of mental disorders and their classification (e.g. Borsboom, Epskamp, Kievit, Cramer, & Schmittmann, 2011; Cuthbert & Kozak, 2013; Kincaid & Sullivan, 2014; Lilienfeld, 2014).”
BackgroundAllan, N. P., Gorka, S. M., Saulnier, K. G., & Bryan, C. J. (2023) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-023-01413-z · Cited by 58
Integrating and differentiating personality and psychopathology in cognitive behavioral therapy
Sauer-Zavala, S. E., Southward, M. W., & Semcho, S. (2020) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12602 · Cited by 58
“…raising suspicion that enhanced diagnostic reliability may have come at the expense of validity; in other words, as a field, we may be overemphasizing categories that are, in fact, minor variations of broader underlying syndromes (Andrews, 1990, 1996; Blashfield et al., 2014; Lilienfeld, 2014).”
Backgroundvon Mücke-Heim, I.-A., Urbina-Treviño, L., Bordes, J., Ries, C., Schmidt, M. V., & Deussing, J. M. (2022) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-022-01762-w · Cited by 53
“The RDoC enterprise is a work in progress and has been termed a “calculated gamble” by Lilienfeld [44].”
BackgroundMethodMcTeague, L. M., Laplante, M.-C., Bulls, H. W., Shumen, J. R., Lang, P. J., & Keil, A. (2017) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.10.004 · Cited by 52
“This has included calls for incorporating the metrics of prognosis, caseness, and disability (81) while also attending to the need for improved reliability of experimental indices, brain and behavior alike (82).”
BackgroundVenables, N. C., Hicks, B. M., Yancey, J. R., Kramer, M. D., Nelson, L. D., Strickland, C. M., Krueger, R. F., Iacono, W. G., & Patrick, C. J. (2016) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.09.011 · Cited by 52
“To facilitate this endeavor, new approaches for assessing mental health problems are needed (Lilienfeld, 2014; Patrick and Hajcak, 2016).”
Levitt, E. E., Oshri, A., Amlung, M. T., Ray, L. A., Sanchez‐Roige, S., Palmer, A. A., & MacKillop, J. (2022) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291721005110 · Cited by 47
“However, a fundamental concern with diagnostic categories is that they define disorders exclusively by signs and symptoms associated with the individual’s subjective experiences and overt presentations, rather than underlying psychological and neurobiological substrates (Lilienfeld, 2014; Lilienfeld & Treadway, 2016).”
BackgroundThe Synaptic and Circuit Functions of Vitamin D in Neurodevelopment Disorders
Ye, X., Zhou, Q., Ren, P., Xiang, W., & Xiao, L. (2023) · Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment · doi:10.2147/ndt.s407731 · Cited by 58
“The focus of this concept was on researching the functional abnormalities of the brain circuits underlying the symptoms rather than the disease itself.(121,122) The main characteristics of ASD are social deficit, restricted interests and repetitive behaviors.”
BackgroundThe role of values in forensic and correctional rehabilitation
Ward, T. J., & Heffernan, R. (2017) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2017.09.002 · Cited by 47
Clinical Psychological Science
Wright, A. G. C., & Hallquist, M. N. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316995808.001 · Cited by 47
Ehrenthal, J. C., Levy, K. N., Scott, L. N., & Granger, D. A. (2018) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi.2018.32.supp.93 · Cited by 52
“While the inconsistencies regarding BPD described in the introduction can be seen as a prime example for the necessity of the RDoC approach, it seems important to exercise caution and not draw premature conclusions (Lilienfeld, 2014).”
BackgroundBurrows, C. A., Timpano, K. R., & Uddin, L. Q. (2017) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702616683506 · Cited by 43
“, neuroimaging, self-reports, ecologically valid lab-based assessments) may help identify the best metric for detecting early risk for internalizing problems, as assessments of RNT at different units of analysis may differentially relate to later maladaptive functioning (Lilienfeld, 2014).”
BackgroundThe National Institute of Mental Health Research Domain Criteria
Paris, J., & Kirmayer, L. J. (2015) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/nmd.0000000000000435 · Cited by 45
“One of the more trenchant critiques, thus far, is by Lilienfeld (2014), who notes that because the RDoC scheme lacks grounding in psychometrics and has demonstrated neither reliability and validity, it cannot replace the DSM or the International Classification of Diseases (World Health…”
BackgroundPaz, R., Zvielli, A., Goldstein, P., & Bernstein, A. (2017) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2017.05.017 · Cited by 39
Social anxiety disorder: looking back and moving forward
Hyett, M. P., & McEvoy, P. M. (2018) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291717003816 · Cited by 38
“time of day of testing, nature of laboratory setting) that contribute to low crosssituational and temporal consistency (Lilienfeld, 2014).”
InfluentialCulture as an ingredient of personalized medicine
Matheson, K., Bombay, A., & Anisman, H. (2017) · Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience · doi:10.1503/jpn.170234 · Cited by 38
Kramer, M. D., Patrick, C. J., Hettema, J. M., Moore, A. A., Sawyers, C. K., & Yancey, J. R. (2019) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191119837613 · Cited by 36
“However, it remains unclear how variables in the realms of biology and biologically-based behavior can be related most effectively to clinical symptom variables (Lilienfeld, 2014; Weinberger, Glick, & Klein, 2015).”
BackgroundMachine Learning and the Digital Measurement of Psychological Health
Galatzer‐Levy, I. R., & Onnela, J.-P. “. (2023) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-080921-073212 · Cited by 39
Psychophysiology as a core strategy in RDoC
Miller, G. A., Rockstroh, B. S., Hamilton, H., & Yee, C. M. (2016) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.12581 · Cited by 37
Can psychiatry refurnish the mind?
Murphy, D. (2017) · Philosophical Explorations · doi:10.1080/13869795.2017.1312499 · Cited by 34
“Lilienfeld (2014) summarises the standard complaints in a recent review article.”
BackgroundHawn, S. E., Wolf, E. J., Neale, Z. E., & Miller, M. W. (2022) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102177 · Cited by 37
Hitchcock, P. F., Britton, W. B., Mehta, K. P., & Frank, M. J. (2022) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-022-01033-9 · Cited by 30
“One reason that many behavioral measures may be unstable across testing sessions is state variation, such as being more fatigued on one day completing a task than another (Hitchcock et al., 2017; Lilienfeld, 2014).”
Treating the individual: moving towards personalised eating disorder care
Bryant, E., Marks, P., Griffiths, K. R., Boulet, S., Pehlivan, M., Barakat, S., Touyz, S. W., & Maguire, S. (2025) · Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1186/s40337-025-01246-6 · Cited by 38
“At an observational level the fit of the categorical model is poor: risk factors and symptoms are continuously distributed in the population [12] and mental disorders are experienced as highly comorbid – at least 50% of people with a mental health diagnosis have more than one [13– 18].”
Classifying major mental disorders genetically
Cao, H., Wang, J., Baranova, A. V., & Zhang, F. (2021) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2021.110410 · Cited by 31
Dynamic risk factors and constructing explanations of offending: The Risk-Causality Method
Heffernan, R., Ward, T. J., Vandevelde, S., & Damme, L. V. (2018) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2018.11.009 · Cited by 27
“…& 8); they are not theoretically coherent and do not refer to causal mechanisms (6 & 7); and analogous concepts have not demonstrated causal relationships (9 - see for example the Research Domain Criteria project which aims to identify causal processes underlying psychopathology; Lilienfeld, 2014).”
Can RDoC Help Find Order in Thought Disorder?
Cohen, A. S., Le, T. P., Fedechko, T. L., & Elvevåg, B. (2017) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbx030 · Cited by 27
Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scales
Smyth, A. C., & Meier, S. T. (2016) · Journal of Attention Disorders · doi:10.1177/1087054715624230 · Cited by 29
Manning, K. J., Wang, L., & Steffens, D. C. (2019) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.17399.1 · Cited by 27
“(3) A salience/emotional processing network (SN), in which the right anterior insula and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) are the primary hubs, assesses the significance of a stimulus and, together with amygdala activity, assigns emotional and motivational value to the stimulus.”
BackgroundBuchman‐Schmitt, J. M., Brislin, S. J., Venables, N. C., Joiner, T. E., & Patrick, C. J. (2016) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2016.09.050 · Cited by 28
“Critics have argued (e.g., Lilienfeld, 2014) that the RDoC framework may be overly reductionistic and not adequately considerate of the principle of multifinality, which holds that identical biological predispositions can be expressed in markedly different ways.”
BackgroundThe Abductive Theory of Method: Scientific Inquiry and Clinical Practice
Ward, T. J., Clack, S., & Haig, B. D. (2016) · Behaviour Change · doi:10.1017/bec.2017.1 · Cited by 26
“Vigorous debate has occurred in the area of psychopathology for the last 30 years or so, concerning the nature of mental disorders and their classification (e.g., Borsboom, Epskamp, Kievit, Cramer, & Schmittmann, 2011; Cuthbert & Kozak, 2013; Kincaid & Sullivan, 2014; Lilienfeld, 2014).”
BackgroundMethodLake, J. I., Yee, C. M., & Miller, G. A. (2017) · Zeitschrift für Psychologie · doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000301 · Cited by 25
“Although there is concern that RDoC overweights biological phenomena (e.g., Goldfried, 2016; Lilienfeld, 2014; Lilienfeld & Treadway, 2016), in fact RDoC is carefully and explicitly agnostic about the mechanistic and causal relationships between psychology and biology and more radically advocates…”
BackgroundInfluentialSituating psychophysiological science within the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework
Hajcak, G., & Patrick, C. J. (2015) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.11.001 · Cited by 22
Variation across Species and Levels: Implications for Model Species Research
Striedter, G. F. (2019) · Brain Behavior and Evolution · doi:10.1159/000499664 · Cited by 28
“…that one can study disease mechanisms even in species that do not actually fall ill with the disease of interest, as long as the species has, or is made to possess, homologs of genes that are linked to this disease in Homo sapiens [Rubin et al., 2000; Gould and Gottesman, 2006; Lilienfeld, 2014].”
BackgroundToward a multimodal measurement model for the neurobehavioral trait of affiliative capacity
Palumbo, I. M., Perkins, E. R., Yancey, J. R., Brislin, S. J., Patrick, C. J., & Latzman, R. D. (2020) · Personality Neuroscience · doi:10.1017/pen.2020.9 · Cited by 25
Chen, Z., Tang, Y., Liu, X., Li, W., Hu, Y., Hu, B., Xu, T., Zhang, R., Xia, L., Zhang, J., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-55008-0 · Cited by 27
“Despite its merits in neurobiological inter-pretability, it is still questioned for its poor theoretical constructs due to its “ reductionist ” assumptions 30,31 .”
Buckheit, K. A., Moskal, D., Spinola, S., & Maisto, S. A. (2018) · Current Addiction Reports · doi:10.1007/s40429-018-0209-8 · Cited by 24
Cuthbert, B. N. (2014) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2014.08.001 · Cited by 22
Retos de la investigación psicológica en salud mental
Tortella‐Feliu, M., Baños, R., Barrantes‐Vidal, N., Botella, C., Fernández‐Aranda, F., García‐Campayo, J., García‐Palacios, A., Hervás, G., Jiménez‐Múrcia, S., Montorio, I., et al. (2016) · Clínica y Salud · doi:10.1016/j.clysa.2016.02.001 · Cited by 22
Challenges of Fear Conditioning Research in the Age of RDoC
Lonsdorf, T. B., & Richter, J. (2017) · Zeitschrift für Psychologie · doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000303 · Cited by 21
Ostlund, B. D., Myruski, S., Buss, K. A., & Pérez‐Edgar, K. E. (2021) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579421000511 · Cited by 22
“Despite its relatively short tenure, the composition, merits, and shortcomings of the RDoC framework have been discussed extensively (Beauchaine & Hinshaw, 2020; Casey, Oliveri, & Insel, 2014; Cuthbert & Insel, 2010; Franklin, Jamieson, Glenn, & Nock, 2015; Garber & Bradshaw, 2020; Insel et al., 2010; Lilienfeld, 2014…”
BackgroundJurjako, M., Malatesti, L., & Brazil, I. A. (2018) · International Journal of Forensic Mental Health · doi:10.1080/14999013.2018.1485188 · Cited by 22
“…for dissatisfaction with this type of syndrome-based classifications, as captured by the DSM 5 and ICD, are heterogeneity, low construct validity, and the categorical measurement of disorders (Lilienfeld, 2014; Lilienfeld, Smith, & Watts, 2013; for a philosophical discussion, see Murphy 2009).”
BackgroundInfluentialAmygdala volume and social anxiety symptom severity: Does segmentation technique matter?
Jayakar, R., Tone, E. B., Crosson, B., Turner, J. A., Anderson, P. L., Phan, K. L., & Klumpp, H. (2019) · Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2019.111006 · Cited by 20
“We operationalized SA as a continuous variable, in line with current dimensional models (Black and Grant, 2014; Kraemer, 2007; Hershenberg and Goldfried, 2015; Lilienfeld, 2014; Van Orden and Areán, 2015).”
MethodDepression as a Disorder of Consciousness
Whiteley, C. M. K. (2021) · The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/716838 · Cited by 21
Conradt, E. D., Crowell, S. E., & Cicchetti, D. (2021) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579421000985 · Cited by 24
“In other words, we should not “confuse biological mediation (the brain) with biological etiology” (Lilienfeld, 2014).”
BackgroundUsing Event-Related Potentials and Startle to Evaluate Time Course in Anxiety and Depression
Klumpp, H., & Shankman, S. A. (2017) · Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2017.09.004 · Cited by 24
“Furthermore, the categorical approach does not take into account the severity of the symptomatology, including the clinical relevance of sub-threshold symptomatology (5) and is less reliable and valid than a dimensional approach (2, 6).”
BackgroundBiocognitive Classification of Antisocial Individuals Without Explanatory Reductionism
Jurjako, M., Malatesti, L., & Brazil, I. A. (2020) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620904160 · Cited by 21
“Thus, the ensuing classifications tend to cover widely heterogeneous groups of people that for clinical and research purposes should be kept apart (Lilienfeld, 2014; Lilienfeld et al., 2013; Murphy, 2006; Poland & Von Eckardt, 2013).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialNielsen, K., & Ward, T. J. (2020) · Theory & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959354320906462 · Cited by 19
“While many have concerns surrounding the potential neurocentricism and reductionism of the RDoC movement (Berenbaum, 2013; Hershenberg & Goldfried, 2015; Kirmayer & Crafa, 2014; Lilienfeld, 2014; Lilienfeld & Treadway, 2016; Nielsen & Ward, 2018; Wakefield, 2014), the shift to focusing on transdiagnostic mechanisms an…”
BackgroundMeasurement to Improve Treatment Delivery: A Commentary on the HiTOP Measure Development Project
Sauer-Zavala, S. E. (2021) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/10731911211050952 · Cited by 19
“Taken together, these issues suggest that improved diagnostic reliability may have come at the expense of validity (Andrews, 1990, 1996; Blashfield et al., 2014; Lilienfeld, 2014).”
BackgroundTranslational research in psychiatry: The Research Domain Criteria Project (RDoC)
Vilar, A., Pérez, V., Blasco, M. J., Pérez-Gallo, E., Ballester, L., Vila, S., Alonso, J., Serrano‐Blanco, A., & Forero, C. G. (2019) · Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental (English Edition) · doi:10.1016/j.rpsmen.2018.04.002 · Cited by 17
A theoretical and empirical modeling of anxiety integrated with RDoC and temporal dynamics
Frank, B. E., Jacobson, N. C., Hurley, L., & McKay, D. (2017) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.09.002 · Cited by 18
Investigación traslacional en psiquiatría: el marco Research Domain Criteria (RDoC)
Vilar, A., Pérez, V., Blasco, M. J., Pérez-Gallo, E., Ballester, L., Vila, S., Alonso, J., Serrano‐Blanco, A., & Forero, C. G. (2018) · Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental · doi:10.1016/j.rpsm.2018.04.002 · Cited by 20
Global mental health and the National Institute of Mental Health Research Domain Criteria
Weine, S. M., Langenecker, S. A., & Arënliu, A. (2018) · International Journal of Social Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/0020764018778704 · Cited by 15
“RDoC constructs are focused not only on biological etiology but also on biological mediation of vulnerability and resilience to psychopathology (Lilienfeld, 2014), including in relation to environment and neurodevelopment.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Lilienfeld, S. O.
- Affiliations
- Emory University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lilienfeld, Scott O.
- ORCID
- Lilienfeld, Scott O.
- Venue
- Behaviour Research and Therapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-11
- Volume
- 62
- Pages
- 129-139
- ISSN
- 0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2080055550
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 150
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 154.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
- Keywords
- Research Domain Criteria, psychopathology classification, DSM, endophenotypes, measurement error, biological predispositions, behavioral manifestations, psychiatric diagnosis
- MeSH terms
- Mental Disorders, Humans, National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.), Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Research, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review