Cited by 77Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationDigital Mental Health Interventions

A pilot randomized controlled trial of videoconference-assisted treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder

Vogel, Patrick A., Solem, Stian, Hagen, Kristen, Moen, Erna M., Launes, Gunvor, Håland, Åshild T., Hansen, Bjarne, Himle, Joseph A.·2014·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Evidence-based exposure and response prevention (ERP) treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is not always easily accessible. Long distances from specialist treatment and other practical or motivational difficulties can interfere with ERP access and outcome. Delivery of ERP through telepsychology can help "fill the gap". The current study included 30 patients with OCD who were randomized to 12 weeks of either videoconference-assisted ERP (VCT; N = 10), self-help ERP (S-H, N = 10), or a wait-list condition (W-L, N = 10). The VCT format included use of tablet-based videoconferencing sessions (N = 6) or studio-based videoconference (N = 4), as well as telephone calls. Patients rated the VCT format as natural and reported strong working alliances with their therapists. VCT treatment produced significantly greater reductions in obsessive-compulsive symptoms compared to the two control conditions. Treatment outcomes were similar to that of regular face-to-face ERP and improvements in symptom scores remained stable at follow-up. The study indicated that ERP for OCD can be delivered efficiently with videoconferencing technology along with telephone calls. The use of such technology in psychological treatment is likely to become more common in the future and it holds promise as a method to make evidence-based treatment more accessible.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2014.10.007

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vogel, P. A., Solem, S., Hagen, K., Moen, E. M., Launes, G., Håland, Å. T., Hansen, B., & Himle, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • St Olav's University Hospital (NO)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • Sørlandet Sykehus (NO)
  • Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Vogel, Patrick A.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
63
Pages
162-168
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086414834
Cited by
77
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Norwegian ExtraFoundation for Health and Rehabilitation (2009/3/0075)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, exposure and response prevention, telepsychology, self-help treatment, treatment accessibility, therapeutic relationship, telephone calls, symptom relief
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Pilot Projects, Self Care, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Telemedicine, Remote Consultation, Videoconferencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review