Cited by 67Digital Mental Health InterventionsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Effectiveness of videoconference-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy for adults with psychiatric disorders: Systematic and meta-analytic review

Open access
Matsumoto, Kazuki, Hamatani, Sayo, Shimizu, Eiji·2021·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is the gold standard of psychotherapy for psychiatric disorders. However, the format of delivering CBT in person limits access to the intervention. The advancements in information and communication technology, especially the internet, present an opportunity for cognitive behavioral therapists to service patients or clients in remote areas through videoconferencing. Although many randomized controlled trials of videoconference-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (VCBT) have already been conducted, the overall estimated effect size of VCBT for psychiatric disorders has not been examined by systematic reviews and meta-analyses. OBJECTIVE: This study attempts to evaluate the effectiveness of VCBT for psychiatric disorders through a systematic and meta-analytic review. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in which VCBT was directly compared to control groups (such as treatment as usual, attention control, wait-list control, and other minimal supports) was carried out. To identify previous studies that meet our study objective, 2 independent reviewers undertook a systematic search through seven databases: MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science, Science Direct, PsycINFO, CINAHL, LILACS, and SciELO. Other databases (ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Central Resister of Controlled Trials) were also checked. All studies included in the review were assessed using the quality criteria of the Cochrane Collaboration. Statistical analysis was performed by using Cochrane Review Manager (RevMan, version 5.4.0). Standardized mean difference was used in major meta-analyses where a P value of .05 or less was the threshold for statistical significance. A heterogeneity test and the chi-square test were performed to assess the presence and extent of statistical heterogeneity with significance set at P<.10. Funnel plots were visually inspected to assess the risk of bias. Subgroup analyses were conducted for each disorder to estimate intervention effects. RESULTS: The systematic search resulted in 16 studies (total N=1745) that met the criteria for this study and were included in the review. There were 10 studies on depressive symptoms, 3 on chronic pain, 1 on generalized anxiety disorder, 1 on obsessive-compulsive disorder, and 1 on hypochondriasis. The quality and risk of bias was also assessed. Results showed a pooled effect size (Hedge g) post treatment of -0.49 (95% CI -0.68 to -0.29), indicating that VCBT is effective for clients with psychiatric disorders. Study quality did not affect outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: While the overall results indicate the effectiveness of VCBT, there are still only a limited number of studies on specific psychiatric and somatic conditions. Therefore, more randomized controlled trials are needed to establish the effectiveness of VCBT for different disorders. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42021224832; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=224832.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/31293

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The RCT's findings confirm what has been found in previous clinical trials for other anxiety disorders and other non-anxiety disorders.

    “The analyses confirmed, with an RCT conducted according to CONSORT guidelines, what has been found in previous clinical trials for other anxiety disorders [30,32,34,77] and other non-anxiety disorders [26,28,33].”

    From A Multisite Non-Inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial of the Efficacy of Cognitive-Behavior Therapy for Generalized Anxiety Disorder Delivered by Videoconference (2022) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Results and Discussion report prior trials of videoconference-delivered CBT for depression and other conditions, including some anxiety disorders. But the Discussion’s “Comparison With Prior Work” says it would be premature to determine effectiveness for anxiety disorders from this review’s effect sizes. The source therefore supports the existence of relevant prior trials, but not an unqualified claim that the cited evidence confirms effectiveness across other anxiety disorders. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Most studies using videoconferencing have been conducted on anxiety-related disorders and major depression.

    “Indeed, most studies using videoconferencing have been conducted on anxiety-related disorders and major depression [26,29,30,32,33,88].”

    From A Multisite Non-Inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial of the Efficacy of Cognitive-Behavior Therapy for Generalized Anxiety Disorder Delivered by Videoconference (2022) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Abstract’s Results report that 10 of 16 included videoconference-delivered CBT studies examined depressive symptoms and three examined anxiety-related conditions, supporting the claim’s general pattern. But the review covers a defined set of CBT studies, not all videoconferencing studies, and it describes the largest group as studies of depressive symptoms rather than specifically major depression. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • An increasing number of studies have documented the efficacy and effectiveness of videoconferencing psychotherapy for mental health disorders.

    “Indeed, an increasing number of studies have documented the efficacy and effectiveness of videoconferencing psychotherapy (VCP) for mental health disorders [26,29,30,32,33].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [7]Schacter D Gilbert D Wegner DM Psychology (2nd edition) 2011 New York, NY Worth
  2. [49]Page MJ McKenzie JE Bossuyt PM Boutron I Hoffmann TC Mulrow CD Shamseer L Tetzlaff JM Akl EA Brennan SE Chou R Glanville J Grimshaw JM Hróbjartsson A Lalu MM Li T Loder EW Mayo-Wilson E McDonald S McGuinness LA Stewart LA Thomas J Tricco AC Welch VA Whiting P Moher D The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews BMJ 2021 03 29 372 n71 10.1136/bmj.n71 33782057 33782057 PMC8005924 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [50]Bogosian A Chadwick P Windgassen S Norton S McCrone P Mosweu I Silber E Moss-Morris R Distress improves after mindfulness training for progressive MS: A pilot randomised trial Mult Scler 2015 08 21 9 1184 1194 10.1177/1352458515576261 25767124 1352458515576261 25767124 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [65]Kishimoto T Tarumi S Mimura M Exposure response prevention utilizing telemedicine-case series of three cases Japanese journal of clinical psychiatry 2016 45 12 1603 1609

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matsumoto, K., Hamatani, S., & Shimizu, E.
Affiliations
  • Kanazawa University (JP)
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Chiba University (JP)
Corresponding author
Matsumoto, Kazuki
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2021-12-13
Volume
23
Issue
12
Pages
e31293
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3210224813
Cited by
67
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DiVA (Linkoping University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (18K03130, 19J00227, 18K17313)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
external beam radiotherapy, mental illness, depression, chronic pain, generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, health anxiety, online therapy, treatment effectiveness, access to mental health care, remote treatment delivery, risk of bias assessment, effect size heterogeneity, publication bias, study quality bias
MeSH terms
Systematic Reviews as Topic, Mental Disorders, Humans, Research Design, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Videoconferencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review