Cited by 117Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationDigital Mental Health Interventions

Telepsychotherapy for generalized anxiety disorder: Impact on the working alliance.

Watts, Stéphanie, Marchand, André, Bouchard, Stéphane, Gosselin, Patrick, Langlois, Frédéric, Belleville, Geneviève, Dugas, Michel J.·2020·Journal of Psychotherapy Integration

Abstract

Telepsychotherapy represents a promising solution to problems pertaining to specialized mental health services accessibility, including when delivering psychotherapy to people who do not have access to care due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The quality of the working alliance established in such a therapeutic context remains often questioned. Moreover, no study has comparatively examined the evolution of the alliance over telepsychotherapy and conventional, face-to-face, psychotherapy. This study assesses the impact of cognitive- behavioral therapy administered via telepsychotherapy or face-to-face on the quality of the working alliance. One hundred and 15 participants suffering from generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) took part in this randomized controlled trial, 50 of whom were assigned to telepsychotherapy in videoconference and 65 of whom were assigned to conventional psychotherapy. Each client and their psychotherapist completed the Working Alliance Inventory every 2 sessions. In the current sample, telepsychotherapy did not interfere with the establishment of the working alliance over the course of the treatment for GAD. On the contrary, clients showed a stronger working alliance in telepsychotherapy delivered in videoconference than in conventional psychotherapy. Clients seemed to be more comfortable with telepsychotherapy than psychotherapists. The clinical implications of these findings are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/int0000223

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Watts, S., Marchand, A., Bouchard, S., Gosselin, P., Langlois, F., Belleville, G., & Dugas, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
  • Université du Québec en Outaouais (CA)
  • Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
  • Université Laval (CA)
Venue
Journal of Psychotherapy Integration
Published
2020-06
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
208-225
ISSN
  • 1053-0479 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3696
OpenAlex
W3034201005
Cited by
117
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 2
FWCI
6.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Psychotherapy Integration (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (176854)
  • Canada Research Chairs (210762; 231039)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
telepsychotherapy, generalized anxiety disorder, therapeutic relationship, cognitive behavioral therapy, face-to-face psychotherapy, Working Alliance Inventory, access to mental health care, COVID-19 pandemic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review