Cited by 84Eating Disorders and BehaviorsPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Treatment protocols for eating disorders: Clinicians’ attitudes, concerns, adherence and difficulties delivering evidence-based psychological interventions

Open access
Waller, Glenn·2016·Current Psychiatry Reports

Abstract

There are several protocols in existence that guide clinicians in the implementation of effective, evidence-based psychological interventions for eating disorders. These have been made accessible in the form of treatment manuals. However, relatively few clinicians use those protocols, preferring to offer more eclectic or integrative approaches. Following a summary of the research that shows that these evidence-based approaches can be used successfully in routine clinical settings, this review considers why there is such poor uptake of these therapies in such settings. This review focuses on the role of service culture and on clinicians' own attitudes, beliefs and emotions. Possible means of enhancing uptake are considered, but these cannot be considered to be ideal solutions at present.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11920-016-0679-0

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waller, G.
Affiliations
University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Waller, Glenn
Venue
Current Psychiatry Reports
Published
2016-02-18
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
36-36
ISSN
  • 1523-3812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-1645
OpenAlex
W2283316693
Cited by
83
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6
FWCI
0.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Psychiatry Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
eating disorders, evidence-based psychological interventions, treatment manual, treatment protocols, clinician attitudes, service culture, medication adherence, routine clinical practice
MeSH terms
Feeding and Eating Disorders, Attitude of Health Personnel, Clinical Protocols, Emotions, Humans, Mental Health Services, Organizational Culture, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review