The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Individualized model predicts brain current flow during transcranial direct-current stimulation treatment in responsive stroke patient
Open accessAbstract
While numerous published reports have demonstrated the beneficial effects of transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) upon task performance, fundamental questions remain regarding the optimal electrode configuration on the scalp. Moreover, it is expected that lesioned brain tissue will influence current flow and should therefore be considered (and perhaps leveraged) in the design of individualized tDCS therapies for stroke. The current report demonstrates how different electrode configurations influence the flow of electrical current through brain tissue in a patient who responded positively to a tDCS treatment targeting aphasia (see Baker, Rorden, & Fridriksson, 2010). The patient, a 60-year-old male, sustained a left hemisphere ischemic stroke (lesion size = 87.42 cc) 64-months prior to his participation. Here we present results from the first high-resolution (1 mm3) model of tDCS in a brain with considerable stroke-related damage; the model was individualized for the patient who received anodal tDCS to his left frontal cortex with the reference cathode electrode placed on his right shoulder. We modeled the resulting brain current flow and also considered three additional reference electrode positions: right mastoid, right orbitofrontal cortex, and a ‘mirror’ configuration with the anode over the undamaged right cortex. Our results demonstrate the profound effect of lesioned tissue on resulting current flow and the ability to modulate current pattern through the brain, including peri-lesional regions, through electrode montage design. The complexity of brain current flow modulation by detailed normal and pathological anatomy suggest: 1) That computational models are critical for the rational interpretation and design of individualized tDCS stroke-therapy; and 2) These models must accurately reproduce head anatomy as shown here.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nitsche, M. A., & Paulus, W. (2000) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x · Cited by 5,656
Cited by
Antal, A., Alekseichuk, I., Bikson, M., Brockmöller, J., Brunoni, A. R., Chen, R., Cohen, L. G., Dowthwaite, G., Ellrich, J., Flöel, A., et al. (2017) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.001 · Cited by 1,301
Self-citationCellular effects of acute direct current stimulation: somatic and synaptic terminal effects
Rahman, A., Reato, D., Arlotti, M., Gasca, F., Datta, A., Parra, L. C., & Bikson, M. (2013) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2012.247171 · Cited by 560
Self-citationTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS): A Beginner's Guide for Design and Implementation
Thair, H., Holloway, A. L., Newport, R., & Smith, A. D. (2017) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2017.00641 · Cited by 513
Li, L. M., Uehara, K., & Hanakawa, T. (2015) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2015.00181 · Cited by 477
tDCS‐Induced Analgesia and Electrical Fields in Pain‐Related Neural Networks in Chronic Migraine
DaSilva, A. F., Mendonca, M. E., Zaghi, S., Lopes, M., DosSantos, M. F., Spierings, E. L., Bajwa, Z., Datta, A., Bikson, M., & Fregni, F. (2012) · Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain · doi:10.1111/j.1526-4610.2012.02141.x · Cited by 305
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Datta, A., Baker, J. M., Bikson, M., & Fridriksson, J.
- Venue
- Brain Stimulation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 169-174
- ISSN
- 1876-4754 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-861X
- OpenAlex
- W2108805590
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Individualized model predicts brain current flow during transcranial direct-current stimulation treatment in responsive stroke patient. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.brs.2010.11.001
- The paper
- Datta, A., Baker, J. M., Bikson, M., & Fridriksson, J. (2011). Individualized model predicts brain current flow during transcranial direct-current stimulation treatment in responsive stroke patient. Brain Stimulation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2010.11.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.