The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cellular effects of acute direct current stimulation: somatic and synaptic terminal effects
Open accessAbstract
Key points: The diversity of cellular targets of direct current stimulation (DCS), including somas, dendrites and axon terminals, determine the modulation of synaptic efficacy. Axon terminals of cortical pyramidal neurons are two–three times more susceptible to polarization than somas. DCS in humans results in current flow dominantly parallel to the cortical surface, which in animal models of cortical stimulation results in synaptic pathway‐specific modulation of neuronal excitability. These results suggest that somatic polarization together with axon terminal polarization may be important for synaptic pathway‐specific modulation of DCS, which underlies modulation of neuronal excitability during transcranial DCS. Abstract Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non‐invasive brain stimulation technique to modulate cortical excitability. Although increased/decreased excitability under the anode/cathode electrode is nominally associated with membrane depolarization/hyperpolarization, which cellular compartments (somas, dendrites, axons and their terminals) mediate changes in cortical excitability remains unaddressed. Here we consider the acute effects of DCS on excitatory synaptic efficacy. Using multi‐scale computational models and rat cortical brain slices, we show the following. (1) Typical tDCS montages produce predominantly tangential (relative to the cortical surface) direction currents (4–12 times radial direction currents), even directly under electrodes. (2) Radial current flow (parallel to the somatodendritic axis) modulates synaptic efficacy consistent with somatic polarization, with depolarization facilitating synaptic efficacy. (3) Tangential current flow (perpendicular to the somatodendritic axis) modulates synaptic efficacy acutely (during stimulation) in an afferent pathway‐specific manner that is consistent with terminal polarization, with hyperpolarization facilitating synaptic efficacy. (4) Maximal polarization during uniform DCS is expected at distal (the branch length is more than three times the membrane length constant) synaptic terminals, independent of and two–three times more susceptible than pyramidal neuron somas. We conclude that during acute DCS the cellular targets responsible for modulation of synaptic efficacy are concurrently somata and axon terminals, with the direction of cortical current flow determining the relative influence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nitsche, M. A., & Paulus, W. (2000) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x · Cited by 5,656
Long-Term Potentiation--A Decade of Progress?
Malenka, R. C., & Nicoll, A. R. A. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.285.5435.1870 · Cited by 2,729
Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans
Nitsche, M. A., & Paulus, W. (2001) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.57.10.1899 · Cited by 2,617
Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: A review
Ranck, J. B. (1975) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(75)90364-9 · Cited by 2,024
Fritsch, B., Reis, J., Martinowich, K., Schambra, H. M., Ji, Y., Cohen, L. G., & Lu, B. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.035 · Cited by 1,420
Datta, A., Bansal, V., Diaz, J., Patel, J., Reato, D., & Bikson, M. (2009) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2009.03.005 · Cited by 1,290
Self-citationDifferential signaling via the same axon of neocortical pyramidal neurons
Markram, H., Wang, Y., & Tsodyks, M. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.9.5323 · Cited by 1,102
Bindman, L. J., Lippold, O. C. J., & Redfearn, J. W. T. (1964) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007425 · Cited by 978
Endogenous electric fields may guide neocortical network activity
Fröhlich, F., & McCormick, D. A. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.06.005 · Cited by 913
INTRACELLULAR ACTIVITIES AND EVOKED POTENTIAL CHANGES DURING POLARIZATION OF MOTOR CORTEX
Purpura, D. P., & McMurtry, J. G. (1965) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1965.28.1.166 · Cited by 870
Cited by
Direct effects of transcranial electric stimulation on brain circuits in rats and humans
Vöröslakos, M., Takeuchi, Y., Brinyiczki, K., Zombori, T., Oliva, A., Fernández-Ruiz, A., Kozák, G., Kincses, Z. T., Iványi, B., Buzsáki, G., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-02928-3 · Cited by 735
Siebner, H. R., Funke, K., Aberra, A. S., Antal, A., Bestmann, S., Chen, R., Classen, J., Davare, M., Di Lazzaro, V., Fox, P. T., et al. (2022) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2022.04.022 · Cited by 566
Li, L. M., Uehara, K., & Hanakawa, T. (2015) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2015.00181 · Cited by 477
Physiology of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Stagg, C. J., Antal, A., & Nitsche, M. A. (2018) · The Journal of ECT · doi:10.1097/yct.0000000000000510 · Cited by 478
Neurobiological after-effects of non-invasive brain stimulation
Cirillo, G., Di Pino, G., Capone, F., Ranieri, F., Florio, L., Todisco, V., Tedeschi, G., Funke, K., & Di Lazzaro, V. (2017) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2016.11.009 · Cited by 446
Metadata
- Authors
- Rahman, A., Reato, D., Arlotti, M., Gasca, F., Datta, A., Parra, L. C., & Bikson, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-04-16
- Volume
- 591
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2563-2578
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2149223842
- Cited by
- 560
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 19.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cellular effects of acute direct current stimulation: somatic and synaptic terminal effects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1113/jphysiol.2012.247171
- The paper
- Rahman, A., Reato, D., Arlotti, M., Gasca, F., Datta, A., Parra, L. C., & Bikson, M. (2013). Cellular effects of acute direct current stimulation: somatic and synaptic terminal effects. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2012.247171
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.