Cited by 1,044Emotion and Mood RecognitionSpeech Recognition and SynthesisSpeech and Audio Processing

Speech emotion recognition using deep 1D & 2D CNN LSTM networks

Zhao, Jianfeng, Mao, Xia, Chen, Lijiang·2019·Biomedical Signal Processing and Control

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bspc.2018.08.035

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, J., Mao, X., & Chen, L.
Affiliations
  • Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • Beihang University (CN)
Corresponding author
Chen, Lijiang
Venue
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
47
Pages
312-323
ISSN
1746-8094 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2889717020
Cited by
1,044
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 78 · 2025: 132 · 2024: 180 · 2023: 191 · 2022: 185 · 2021: 141 · 2020: 108 · 2019: 29
FWCI
91.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61603013)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (YWF-18-BJ-Y-181)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
Keywords
speech emotion recognition, 1D-CNN-LSTM, log-mel spectrogram, long-range dependencies, IEMOCAP

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review