Cited by 270Innovation and Knowledge ManagementBusiness Strategies and InnovationOrganizational Management and Leadership

Resilience: Continuous renewal of competitive advantages

Teixeira, Eduardo de Oliveira, Werther, William B.·2013·Business Horizons

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bushor.2013.01.009

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teixeira, E. D. O., & Werther, W. B.
Affiliations
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
  • University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Teixeira, Eduardo de Oliveira
Venue
Business Horizons
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-05
Volume
56
Issue
3
Pages
333-342
ISSN
0007-6813 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2118652457
Cited by
270
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4
FWCI
13.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Business Horizons (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Organizational Management and Leadership
Keywords
organizational resilience, competitive advantage, innovation process, organizational culture, innovation orientation, firm performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review